Comparison of Repaglinide and Gliclazide in Chinese Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Never Received Oral Antidiabetic Drug Treatment

June 25, 2014 updated by: Novo Nordisk A/S

A 16-week, Multicentre, Randomised, Open-label, Parallel Group Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety Profiles of Repaglinide Monotherapy Compared to Gliclazide Monotherapy in Chinese Antidiabetic-naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate the blood glucose lowering effect and the safety profile of repaglinide given alone compared to gliclazide given alone in Chinese subjects with type 2 diabetes who never have been treated with oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs). This study also investigates the augment effect of repaglinide on the phases of insulin secretion as a subgroup study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
440

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Shanghai
      • Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200025

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Oral anti-diabetic drug (OAD) naïve (unsystematic OAD treatment 6 months prior to this trial is allowed)
  • Insulin naïve (less than 1 week of daily use of insulin therapy before trial start is allowed)
  • Lipid-lowing agent naïve
  • HbA1c: 6.5-8.5%
  • Fasting glucose: 6.1-13.0 mmol/L (110-234 mg/dl)
  • Body Mass Index (BMI): 20-35 kg/m^2
  • Be able and willing to perform self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG)
  • Be able and willing to eat 3 main meals per day
  • Only applicable to subjects who will participate in the subgroup study: Be able and willing to perform and complete IVGTT (intravenous glucose tolerance test) at additional visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known or suspected allergy to repaglinide, gliclazide, or related products (for example sulfonamide or other sulphonylureas (SUs)), or any of the excipients in the study drugs
  • Previous participation in this study
  • Participation in a study of another investigational drug within 1 month prior to study start

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: repaglinide
1 mg repaglinide twice daily (weeks 0-4), titrated (individually adjusted) to maintenance dose (weeks 4-16). Maximum dose is 4 mg three times daily
Drug: repaglinide
Individually adjusted dose for 16 weeks
Active Comparator: gliclazide
80 mg gliclazide once daily (weeks 0-4), titrated (individually adjusted) to maintenance dose (weeks 4-16). Maximum dose is 160 mg twice daily
Drug: gliclazide
Individually adjusted dose for 16 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin (HbA1c)
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Week 0, week 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Week 0, week 16
Change in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose (PPG) Over a Standard Meal
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
A standard meal contains 100g carbohydrate
Week 0, week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving the Treatment Target of HbA1c Below or Equal to 6.5%
Time Frame: Week 16
Week 16
Change in Fasting Serum Free Fatty Acid (FFA) From Baseline
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Week 0, week 16
Change in 2-hour Postprandial Serum Free Fatty Acid (FFA) Over a Standard Meal
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Week 0, week 16
Change in AUC0-180 of Serum Insulin Concentration of IVGTT (Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test)
Time Frame: Over the course of three hours at Week 0 and Week 16
Over the course of three hours at Week 0 and Week 16
Change in AUC0-180 of Plasma Glucose Concentration of IVGTT
Time Frame: Over the course of three hours at Week 0 and Week 16
Over the course of three hours at Week 0 and Week 16
Number of All Treatment Emergent Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Time Frame: Weeks 0-16
A hypoglycaemic episode was defined as treatment emergent if the onset of the episode was on or after the first day of trial product and no later than the last day of the trial product.
Weeks 0-16
Cholesterol
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
The number of participants having a change in cholesterol from "normal" to "abnormal". "Abnormal" means a value of blood cholesterol is out of the normal range.
Week 0, week 16
Change in Body Weight
Time Frame: Week 0, week 16
Week 0, week 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Novo Nordisk A/S

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 26, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 26, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 1, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 9, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 25, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • AGEE-3783
  • U1111-1111-9453 (Other Identifier: WHO)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings