Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Bipolar Sealer Aquamantys 6.0 in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (Hip)

October 30, 2012 updated by: The Cleveland Clinic
The present prospective, single-center, clinical trial is designed to evaluate the hemostatic efficacy of the hemostatic sealer Aquamantys 6.0™ in patients managed with total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is hypothesized that Aquamantys 6.0™ can improve hemostasis following total hip arthroplasty. Comparison of the functional and clinical results between THA patients having been exposed to Aquamantys 6.0™ versus a control group will be analyzed using several outcome measures including the Harris Hip Score and a pain scale. The primary variable of interest is transfusion requirements - specifically, number of patients managed with blood transfusion during the hospital stay after surgery. However, of secondary interest will be: 1) number of units transfused, 2) estimated intraoperative total blood loss, 3) change in pre- and post-operative hemoglobin levels, 4) total narcotic usage during hospital stay, 5) length of stay, 6) functional and pain outcomes (Harris Hip Score and Pain Scale), and 7) adverse events.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
140

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 18 - 85 years
  • Sex: Both male and female will be included. The male-to-female ratio will depend upon the patient population.
  • Stable Health: At the time of surgery based on physical examination and medical history.
  • Patient exhibited preoperative radiographic evidence of joint degeneration consistent with THA that could not have been treated in non-operative fashion.
  • Patient had severe hip pain and disability due to degenerative joint disease.
  • Patient or patient's legal representative has signed the Informed Consent form. The patient is capable of making informed decisions regarding his/her healthcare.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with history of cardiac disease, liver disease or renal disease. Severe cardiac disease, liver disease and renal dysfunction can confound different parameters within this study. Patients with decreased cardiac function from prior myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy or congestive heart failure will likely require transfusions with packed red blood cells at lower thresholds relative to healthy counterparts for cardioprotection. Therefore, patients with a prior history of myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure or other significant cardiac history will be excluded from this study. In addition, patients with liver dysfunction from cirrhosis or hepatitis may have impaired production of factors in the clotting cascade which may make these individuals more prone to bleed, especially with the use of anticoagulants such as lovenox. For this reason, these patients will also be excluded from this study. Finally, individuals with renal dysfunction will have decreased creatinine clearance, which may artificially elevate the levels of lovenox, thereby promoting bleeding. In addition, individuals with severe renal disease may also have associated anemia which would complicate the transfusion threshold. For this reason, individuals with chronic renal failure, diabetic nephropathy, or decreased creatinine clearance will be excluded from this study.
  • Patients predonating autologous blood.
  • Patients with preoperative hemoglobin level less than 11.5 g/dL or a hematocrit less than 35%. Patients with a preoperative platelet count of less than 100,000.
  • Patients undergoing bilateral or revision surgery.
  • Evidence of bleeding or metabolic - based hemolytic disorder (hemophilia or anticoagulation use)
  • Previous history of infection in the affected joint.
  • Peripheral vascular disease.
  • Patient was a poor compliance risk - treated for ethanol or drug abuse, physical or mental handicap, etc.
  • Patients whose personal beliefs exclude the use of blood transfusions (example: Jehovah's witness).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Placebo Comparator: Standard Bovie Electrocautery
Standard Bovie electrocautery [Valleylab, Boulder, Colorado] used on surgical site during primary total hip arthroplasty to deliver high frequency electrical current to seal tissues and blood vessels.
Device: Standard Bovie Electrocautery
Experimental: Bipolar Radiofrequency
Aquamantys 6.0 bipolar sealer [Salient Surgical Technologies, Portsmouth, New Hampshire] used on surgical site during primary total hip arthroplasty to deliver radiofrequency energy coupled with saline solution irrigation for hemostatic sealing (i.e. shrinking of collagen in the walls of tissue vessels) at lower temperatures (<100 degrees Celsius) than standard Bovie electrocautery.
Device: Bipolar Radiofrequency (Aquamantys 6.0)
Other Names:
  • Aquamantys 6.0

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Patients Managed With Blood Transfusion
Time Frame: daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)
daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Units Transfused
Time Frame: daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)
daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)
Estimated Blood Loss
Time Frame: Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Change in Hemoglobin Level
Time Frame: within 30 days before surgery (preop), day of hospital discharge
Change in hemoglobin level from baseline to the day of hospital discharge.
within 30 days before surgery (preop), day of hospital discharge
Total Narcotic Usage (Morphine-equivalent mg) During Hospital Stay
Time Frame: daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)
Sum of daily morphine-equivalent mg narcotic usage during hospital stay.
daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)
Length of Stay
Time Frame: day of hospital discharge
day of hospital discharge
Harris Hip Score (Outcome Score)
Time Frame: within 30 days before surgery (preop), 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgery
A scoring system used to evaluate the outcome after total hip replacement. Domains include pain (44 points), function (47 points), deformity (4 points), and range of motion (5 points). A total score is computed by summing the individual domain scores, with a maximum of 100 points. Higher values represent better outcomes. A total Harris Hip Score below 70 points is generally considered a poor result, 70 to 80 fair, 80 to 90 good, and 90 to 100 excellent.
within 30 days before surgery (preop), 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgery
Pain Score Scale
Time Frame: within 30 days before surgery (preop), 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgery
A single scoring system used to evaluate overall pain on a scale of integers 0 to 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "unbearable pain." Thus, in this context, lower values represent better outcomes.
within 30 days before surgery (preop), 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Cleveland Clinic

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Salient Surgical Technologies

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 3, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 4, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 7, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 29, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 30, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 06-615

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings