Evaluation of the Efficacy of the Bipolar Sealer Aquamantys 6.0 in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty (Hip)

October 30, 2012 updated by: The Cleveland Clinic
The present prospective, single-center, clinical trial is designed to evaluate the hemostatic efficacy of the hemostatic sealer Aquamantys 6.0™ in patients managed with total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is hypothesized that Aquamantys 6.0™ can improve hemostasis following total hip arthroplasty. Comparison of the functional and clinical results between THA patients having been exposed to Aquamantys 6.0™ versus a control group will be analyzed using several outcome measures including the Harris Hip Score and a pain scale. The primary variable of interest is transfusion requirements - specifically, number of patients managed with blood transfusion during the hospital stay after surgery. However, of secondary interest will be: 1) number of units transfused, 2) estimated intraoperative total blood loss, 3) change in pre- and post-operative hemoglobin levels, 4) total narcotic usage during hospital stay, 5) length of stay, 6) functional and pain outcomes (Harris Hip Score and Pain Scale), and 7) adverse events.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

140

Phase

  • Phase 4

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 18 - 85 years
  • Sex: Both male and female will be included. The male-to-female ratio will depend upon the patient population.
  • Stable Health: At the time of surgery based on physical examination and medical history.
  • Patient exhibited preoperative radiographic evidence of joint degeneration consistent with THA that could not have been treated in non-operative fashion.
  • Patient had severe hip pain and disability due to degenerative joint disease.
  • Patient or patient's legal representative has signed the Informed Consent form. The patient is capable of making informed decisions regarding his/her healthcare.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with history of cardiac disease, liver disease or renal disease. Severe cardiac disease, liver disease and renal dysfunction can confound different parameters within this study. Patients with decreased cardiac function from prior myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy or congestive heart failure will likely require transfusions with packed red blood cells at lower thresholds relative to healthy counterparts for cardioprotection. Therefore, patients with a prior history of myocardial infarction, cardiomyopathy, congestive heart failure or other significant cardiac history will be excluded from this study. In addition, patients with liver dysfunction from cirrhosis or hepatitis may have impaired production of factors in the clotting cascade which may make these individuals more prone to bleed, especially with the use of anticoagulants such as lovenox. For this reason, these patients will also be excluded from this study. Finally, individuals with renal dysfunction will have decreased creatinine clearance, which may artificially elevate the levels of lovenox, thereby promoting bleeding. In addition, individuals with severe renal disease may also have associated anemia which would complicate the transfusion threshold. For this reason, individuals with chronic renal failure, diabetic nephropathy, or decreased creatinine clearance will be excluded from this study.
  • Patients predonating autologous blood.
  • Patients with preoperative hemoglobin level less than 11.5 g/dL or a hematocrit less than 35%. Patients with a preoperative platelet count of less than 100,000.
  • Patients undergoing bilateral or revision surgery.
  • Evidence of bleeding or metabolic - based hemolytic disorder (hemophilia or anticoagulation use)
  • Previous history of infection in the affected joint.
  • Peripheral vascular disease.
  • Patient was a poor compliance risk - treated for ethanol or drug abuse, physical or mental handicap, etc.
  • Patients whose personal beliefs exclude the use of blood transfusions (example: Jehovah's witness).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Standard Bovie Electrocautery
Standard Bovie electrocautery [Valleylab, Boulder, Colorado] used on surgical site during primary total hip arthroplasty to deliver high frequency electrical current to seal tissues and blood vessels.
Experimental: Bipolar Radiofrequency
Aquamantys 6.0 bipolar sealer [Salient Surgical Technologies, Portsmouth, New Hampshire] used on surgical site during primary total hip arthroplasty to deliver radiofrequency energy coupled with saline solution irrigation for hemostatic sealing (i.e. shrinking of collagen in the walls of tissue vessels) at lower temperatures (<100 degrees Celsius) than standard Bovie electrocautery.
Other Names:
  • Aquamantys 6.0

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Patients Managed With Blood Transfusion
Time Frame: daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)
daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Units Transfused
Time Frame: daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)
daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)
Estimated Blood Loss
Time Frame: Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Intraoperative (day of surgery)
Change in Hemoglobin Level
Time Frame: within 30 days before surgery (preop), day of hospital discharge
Change in hemoglobin level from baseline to the day of hospital discharge.
within 30 days before surgery (preop), day of hospital discharge
Total Narcotic Usage (Morphine-equivalent mg) During Hospital Stay
Time Frame: daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)
Sum of daily morphine-equivalent mg narcotic usage during hospital stay.
daily during hospital stay (an expected average of 4 days)
Length of Stay
Time Frame: day of hospital discharge
day of hospital discharge
Harris Hip Score (Outcome Score)
Time Frame: within 30 days before surgery (preop), 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgery
A scoring system used to evaluate the outcome after total hip replacement. Domains include pain (44 points), function (47 points), deformity (4 points), and range of motion (5 points). A total score is computed by summing the individual domain scores, with a maximum of 100 points. Higher values represent better outcomes. A total Harris Hip Score below 70 points is generally considered a poor result, 70 to 80 fair, 80 to 90 good, and 90 to 100 excellent.
within 30 days before surgery (preop), 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgery
Pain Score Scale
Time Frame: within 30 days before surgery (preop), 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgery
A single scoring system used to evaluate overall pain on a scale of integers 0 to 10, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing "unbearable pain." Thus, in this context, lower values represent better outcomes.
within 30 days before surgery (preop), 4 weeks after surgery, 12 weeks after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 3, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

December 7, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 29, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 30, 2012

Last Verified

October 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 06-615

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Arthritis

Clinical Trials on Standard Bovie Electrocautery

3
Subscribe