Somatostatin Analog Treatment of Acromegaly Before Pituitary Surgery : Comparison With Neurosurgery Alone (SAPORO)

July 30, 2014 updated by: University Hospital, Rouen

Multicenter, Randomised Open Trial Comparing the Efficacy of a Medical Treatment With Sandostatin LP 30 mg Performed Before Surgery to a Prime Line transsphenoïdal Surgery in Previously Untreated Acromegalic Patients With Either a Micro or a Macro Pituitary Adenoma

The aim of the study is to evaluate the interest of a six month pre-operative treatment with a long-acting somatostatin analog (Sandostatin LP) versus surgery alone in patients with a pituitary adenoma responsible for acromegaly.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Somatotroph pituitary adenoma is the most frequent cause of acromegaly. A transsphenoidal removal of the tumor is used as the first line treatment. Somatostatin analogs are used as to whether recovery was not obtained after surgery or pituitary surgery was contraindicated. Previous studies with somatostatin analogs have shown a drop in plasma GH and IGF-1 levels and a reduction in adenoma size in 75 and 25% of patients respectively. Retrospective studies suggest that a treatment with somatostatin analogs performed before surgery may be of interest to improve anesthesic conditions and surgical outcome. The aim of present study is to prospectively evaluate the interest of a first line treatment with a long-acting somatostatin analog (Sandostatin) before performing a pituitary surgery in acromegalic patients with either a micro or a macroadenoma to improve peri-operative conditions and hopefully surgical outcome. After informed consent, untreated acromegalic patients will be included and randomly assigned to one of the following treatment procedures : either pituitary surgery or a six month treatment with long-acting Sandostatin 30 mg monthly for 6 months before performing transsphenoïdal adenoma removal. The patients will be evaluated before any treatment, on months 3 and 6 of the treatment with Sandostatin (for the patients enrolled in this arm of the study) and on months 3 and 12 after pituitary neurosurgery. Each evaluation will include clinical data, hormone testing and radiological (MRI) investigation. The main endpoint will be the rate of recovery proved by a normalisation of GH secretion and plasma IGF-1 level. Secondary endpoints will include the evaluation of clinical, radiological, biological, anesthesic, surgical and pathological parameters. A comparison between the two arms will be performed at entry into the study, at the time of surgery and then on months 3 and 12 following the transsphenoidal removal of the somatotroph adenoma.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
89

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Angers, France, 49000
        • Angers University Hospital
      • Besançon, France, 25000
        • Besançon University Hospital
      • Caen, France, 14000
        • Caen University hospital
      • Grenoble, France, 38000
        • Grenoble University Hospital
      • Le Kremlin Bicetre, France, 94000
        • Paris XI University Hospital
      • Lille, France, 59000
        • Lille University Hospital
      • Limoges, France, 87000
        • University Hospital of Limoges
      • Lyon, France, 69000
        • Lyon University Hospital
      • Marseille, France, 13000
        • Marseille University Hospital
      • Pessac, France, 33000
        • Bordeaux University Hospital
      • Rouen, France, 76000
        • Rouen University Hospital
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • Strasbourg University Hospital
      • Toulouse, France, 31000
        • Toulouse Universtiy Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • men and women
  • 18-80 years old
  • untreated acromegaly
  • unsuppressed GH secretion after a glucose load and elevated IGF-1 plasma levels
  • presence of a pituitary adenoma on MRI
  • informed consent given.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • acromegaly previously treated
  • contraindication to pituitary surgery
  • associated hyperprolactinemia above 200 ng/ml
  • visual field defect needing rapid transsphenoidal surgery
  • contraindication to a treatment with octreotide

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm A
pre-operative medical treatment with Sandostatin
Drug: Pre-treatment with octreotide
Pre-treatment with octreotide
No Intervention: Arm B
pituitary surgery as a first line treatment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
IGF1 plasma levels
Time Frame: 3 months and 12 months after transphenoidal surgery
3 months and 12 months after transphenoidal surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
GH plasma levels
Time Frame: 3 and 12 months after transphenoidal surgery
3 and 12 months after transphenoidal surgery
Evaluation of the effects of the pre-operative treatment with Sandostatin on clinical, radiological, biological, anesthesic, surgical and pathological parameters.
Time Frame: at transphenoidal surgery
at transphenoidal surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University Hospital, Rouen

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Jean M Kuhn, MD, PhD, Rouen University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 7, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 8, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 9, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
July 31, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 30, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
July 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 2004/089/HP
  • 2004-004524-12 (Registry Identifier: EudraCT)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings