The Effect of Enalapril and Losartan on Peritoneal Membrane in Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

May 9, 2010 updated by: Chulalongkorn University
A prospective, randomized, open-label, Single-center clinical trial to determine whether Enalapril or Enalapril plus Losartan effect on Peritoneal membrane transportation.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Detailed description:

Many peritoneal dialysis patients suffer from uremia due to inadequate dialysis or volume overload caused by failure of peritoneal membrane transport.One of the most important etiologies of peritoneal membrane failure are unavoidable to use high glucose-containing dialysate solution that induce injury to mesothelial cell.Previous data found that injured mesothelial cell produces Angiotensin (Ang) II to induce peritoneal inflammation and fibrosis. Blockade of the renin-angiotensin system by angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition(ACEI) or angiotensin receptor antagonism (ARB) play a major role to slow this effect.

Although many trials in animal study have proved the benefit of ACEI and ARB in peritoneal membrane transport but clinical evidences in human are controversy. Up to now, all previous trials have limitation. First,The trials have small number of population(less than 20 in prospective randomized controlled trial). Second, The trials have multiple confounders on the study population because of the study include old case (that on peritoneal dialysis for many years) and new case (that just start treatment less than 1 year). Third, short duration of study(less than 3 months) to see the significant effect of RAAS blockade on peritoneal membrane transport. Forth, most study use dialysate albumin loss as an index of peritoneal membrane transport ,that less sensitivity to predict peritoneal membrane function. Fifth,no previous trials are attempted to study the effect of combination between ACEI and ARB. Therefore,we design to study the effect of both ACEI and ARB in a larger number of population, only in new case which are just recently found to be on peritoneal dialysis, our study is taken in longer duration and use both modified peritoneal equilibrium test and dialysate CA125 as an index of peritoneal membrane (physiology and anatomic index).This research will demonstrate efficacy of Enalapril and Losartan on Peritoneal membrane transportation lead to improve quality of life in CAPD patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
90

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact

The name and contact information for the person who can answer enrollment questions for a clinical study. Each location where the study is being conducted may also have a specific contact, who may be better able to answer those questions.
  • Name: Talerngsak Kanjanabuch, Assist. Prf.
  • Phone Number: 211 662-2564321
  • Email: golfnephro@yahoo.com

Study Locations

  • Thailand
      • Bangkok, Thailand, 10330
        • Recruiting
        • Chulalongkorn University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Talerngsak Kanjanabuch, Assist. Prf.
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Wassawon Wontanatawatot, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. All patients received CAPD more than 1 months but less than 1 year
  2. Subjects of either sex, more than 20 years old
  3. Hypertension
  4. Provision of written informed consent by subject or guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. No history of taking an ACE inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blockers or aldosterone antagonist for at least 2 month
  2. Serum potassium more than 5.5 mEq/L
  3. History of renal artery stenosis
  4. Peritonitis or volume overload within the preceding 1 month
  5. Myocardial infarction within the preceding 6 months or clinically significant valvular disease or any active cardiovascular disease
  6. History of malignant hypertension or hypertensive encephalopathy or cerebrovascular accident within the preceding 6 months
  7. Any condition that may have precluded a patient from remaining in the study, such as alcohol or drug abuse, chronic liver disease, malignant disease, or psychiatric disorder
  8. History of allergy or intolerance to an ACE inhibitor or ARB
  9. Hypotension defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Enalapril
Drug: Enalapril
Patients with hypertension will take 20-40mg enalapril per day, antihypertensive agents other than ACE inhibitors and ARBs and spironolactone will be allowed. Doses are adjusted appropriately to achieve and maintain the target blood pressure of 130/80 mmHg
Other Names:
  • Anapril
Active Comparator: Enalapril plus Losartan
Drug: Enalapril plus Losartan
Patients with hypertension will take 20-40mg enalapril plus 25-50mg losartan per day, antihypertensive agents other than ACE inhibitors and ARBs and spironolactone will be allowed. Doses are adjusted appropriately to achieve and maintain the target blood pressure of 130/80 mmHg
Other Names:
  • Anapril plus Loranta
Placebo Comparator: Control
Drug: antihypertensive agents, except ACE inhibitors and ARBs and spironolactone. Administration of antihypertensive agents will select as follows : CCB→β-blocker→α-blocker-->hydralazine
Drug: Placebo
Patients in the control group will administer antihypertensive agents, except ACE inhibitors and ARBs and spironolactone. Doses are adjusted appropriately to achieve and maintain the target blood pressure of 130/80 mmHg
Other Names:
  • Control

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in dialysate CA-125 and modified peritoneal equilibrium test
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Dialysis adequacy, residual renal function, hospitalization, peritonitis episodes, any adverse drug effects, death from any cause
Time Frame: every 1 month, except for dialysis adequacy evaluate every 3 mo
every 1 month, except for dialysis adequacy evaluate every 3 mo

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Chulalongkorn University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Talerngsak Kanjanabuch, Assist. Prf., Chulalongkorn University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2010

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 4, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 4, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 12, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 9, 2010

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 203/52

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis

Clinical Trials on Enalapril

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings