TRP Versus Photo Selective Vaporization for Obstructive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Management (REVAPRO)

April 30, 2013 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Transurethral Resection of the Prostate With Photo Selective Vaporization of the Prostate Using the High Powered 532nm Laser Obstructive Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Management: Focus on Efficiency and Cost-effectiveness

The aim of this study is to compare medical efficacy and cost effectiveness of two surgical options for obstructive BPH management : transurethral resection of the prostate with photo selective vaporization of the prostate using the high powered 532nm laser.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare medical efficacy and cost effectiveness of two surgical options for obstructive BPH management : transurethral resection of the prostate with photo selective vaporization of the prostate using the high powered 532nm laser. Patients were randomized in two groups after inclusion. Perioperative data were collected, and follow-up was conducted for one month.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
142

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • France
      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Hôpital Tenon - Service d'Urologie

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male, 50 years of age or older.
  2. American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification of physical status, class 1-3
  3. Signed an informed consent at the beginning of the study.
  4. Patients presenting with LUTS associated to benign prostatic enlargement for more than 3 months, needing a surgical management, with at least one of the following situations: disability score ≥3, I-PSS ≥12, or full urinary retention
  5. Qmax ≤12ml /s for no drained patients with voided volume> 125 ml.
  6. Estimated prostate weight between 25g and 80g
  7. Patient free of catheter with PVR ≤ 300cc
  8. Patient without renal disorders.
  9. No prostate cancer suspicion at clinical examination, including DRE.
  10. PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml, with negative prostate biopsies of PSA is between 4 and 10 ng/mL if patient is 75 years or younger or has a life expectancy of more than 10 years.
  11. In case of anticoagulation or anti-aggregation therapy, necessary preoperative visit by anaesthesiologist to determine the supply therapy around surgery.
  12. In case of current BPH medical management, alpha blockers and herbal medicines should be stopped one week before surgery and 5-alpha-reductase-inhibitors should be stopped one month before surgery.
  13. Patient must be affiliated to the French social healthcare or equivalent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Uncontrolled cardiopulmonary disorder, previously or recently diagnosed by standard methods
  2. Assessed sphincter detrusor dyssynergia, or myasthenia, multiple sclerosis, or Parkinson disease.
  3. History of pelvic lesions with abdominal sphincter injury.
  4. Urinary tract infection without antibiotics.
  5. Patient with urinary catheter or suprapubic catheter because of an acute urinary retention linked to an alternative diagnosis or impaired bladder sensation.
  6. Subject with neurogenic bladder and/or sphincter abnormalities
  7. Subject with confirmed or suspected malignancy of the prostate or the bladder.
  8. Previous prostatic surgery.
  9. History of bladder stone, major hematuria, urethral stricture, bladder neck stenosis.
  10. Patient having a prosthesis in the procedure area
  11. Patient with an active anorectal disease
  12. Treatment emergency
  13. Individual unable to respect timing and visits determined by the protocol.
  14. Constitutional hemostasis and coagulation abnormalities not linked to oral medications
  15. Any disease or patient condition which can be a contra indication to his enrolment in the study, according to the investigator.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: 1 : TURP
Surgery: TransUrethral Resection of the Prostate
Procedure: TURP
TransUrethral Resection of the Prostate
Other: 2 : PVP
Surgery: Photo selective Vaporization of the Prostate
Procedure: PVP
Photo selective Vaporization of the Prostate

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Hospital stay
Time Frame: end of hospitalization
end of hospitalization
Clinical symptoms at 1-yr follow-up evaluated with usual objective and subjective parameters
Time Frame: at one year
at one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Rate of complication needing re-hospitalisation or reintervention
Time Frame: from the surgical procedure until one year follow-up
from the surgical procedure until one year follow-up
Risk of ignoring a localized prostate cancer needing a curative management.
Time Frame: at one year
at one year
Total and post-operative costs during follow-up.
Time Frame: from the surgical procedure until one year follow-up
from the surgical procedure until one year follow-up
Evaluation of side effects during follow-up.
Time Frame: from the surgical procedure until one year follow-up
from the surgical procedure until one year follow-up
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: during follow up
during follow up
Evaluation of quality of life
Time Frame: during follow up
during follow up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Ministry of Health, France
American Medical Systems

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Bertrand LUKACS, MD, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
February 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 21, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 6, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 7, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 1, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 30, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • K060401

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings