Antidepressants to Promote Recovery of Cardiac Patients Suffering From Depression (ARCADE)

January 27, 2016 updated by: Nancy Frasure-Smith, Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Predictors of Depression Treatment Response Following an Acute Coronary Syndrome

Depression is frequently seen in cardiac patients. It has been shown that depression often has a negative impact on the course of coronary disease. More recently, research has demonstrated that some antidepressants can be used safely to treat depressed coronary patients. Although the majority of patients improve substantially with antidepressant treatment, a significant proportion do not respond to antidepressants. This project seeks to better understand why depression does not improve equally well in all patients. Ultimately, the hope is to improve the treatments available to people affected by both cardiac disease and depression, and to help select the best type of treatment in advance for each individual based on his or her personal history, and biological characteristics.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

In this study 140 patients who have had a recent hospitalization for an acute coronary syndrome and who have major depression will all receive 12 weeks of treatment with the antidepressant citalopram and regular clinical management visits from a mental health professional. The objective is to examine the characteristics of depressed cardiac patients who do and do not show an improvement in depression with citalopram treatment. There is evidence that the causes of depression may be different in some people with cardiac disease than in individuals who do not have heart problems, and these differences may be at least partially involved in determining response to antidepressant treatment. Inflammation, one of the body's responses to the development of atherosclerosis (hardening of the arteries and blockages in the heart) may be particularly important in producing depression in cardiac patients. There may also be changes in the body's metabolism of tryptophan, a protein that is involved in making serotonin, and levels of serotonin are often low in depression. Other factors thought to influence the development of depression include childhood experiences and personality factors. Heredity and family history also seem to play a role in some people with depression and heart disease. Finally, some patients experience sleep apnea, interruptions in breathing while they are asleep, that can contribute to both cardiac disease and depression.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
7

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2L 4M1
        • Centre de recherche du CHUM
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1A1
        • Montreal Heart Insitute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • At least 18 years old
  • Diagnostic and Statical Manual-Revision 4 (DSM-IV) diagnosis of current MDD based on the Structured Clinical Interview for Depression (SCID)
  • Duration of major depressive disorder (MDD) at least 4 weeks at baseline
  • Hospital discharge for an acute coronary syndrome 4 to 24 weeks prior to baseline
  • No coronary artery bypass (CABG) surgery during or since the admission for the index event, and no plan for CABG during the next 4 months after baseline
  • Stable coronary artery disease (CAD) based on physician's clinical judgement
  • Provision of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

  • Significant cognitive problems (Mini-mental Status Exam, MMSE < 24) Structured Clinical Interview for Depression (SCID) documented bipolar disorder or use of lithium or anticonvulsants (e.g. tegretol, depakene, neurontin) for mood disorder
  • MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) documented major depression with psychotic features
  • MINI documented current or recent (within 12 months) substance abuse or dependence
  • Serious suicide risk based on clinical judgment
  • Currently taking antidepressants (including St. John's Wort)
  • Absence of response to a previous adequate trial of citalopram
  • Lifetime evidence of citalopram intolerance or lifetime evidence of intolerance to two or more other SSRIs
  • 2 or more previous unsuccessful trials of treatment for the current depressive episode
  • Depression due to a general medical condition based on clinical judgment (e.g., clinical hypothyroidism)
  • Cold, flu or other infection or dental work (including teeth cleaning) in 14 days before baseline
  • Use of antibiotics or steroids (other than topical steroids) in 14 days before baseline
  • Participation in any randomized clinical trial
  • Inability to speak French or English
  • Investigator's judgement that patient is unable/unwilling to comply with study regimen

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NA
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes from baseline to 12 weeks in depression levels on the 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-24)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Administered centrally by telephone
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes from baseline to 12 weeks in depression levels on the Inventory of Depressive Severity Clinician Version (IDS-C)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Administered centrally by telephone
12 weeks
Changes from baseline to 12 weeks in self-reported depression symptoms on the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
self-report
12 weeks
Changes from baseline to 12 weeks in Inflammatory markers
Time Frame: 12 weeks
e.g. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Interleukin-10 (IL-10), C-Reactive Protein (CRP), Soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (s-ICAM1)
12 weeks
Changes from baseline to 12 weeks in kynurenine levels
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Changes from baseline to 12 weeks in tryptophan levels
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Changes from baseline to 12 weeks in neopterin levels
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Changes from baseline to 12 weeks in cognitive function
Time Frame: 12 weeks
scores on the Trail Making Tests A and B, Digit Symbol Substitution Test, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
Montreal Heart Institute
Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Nancy Frasure-Smith, PhD, Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal
  • Principal Investigator: François Lespérance, MD, Département de psychiatrie, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 1, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 6, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 7, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 27, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • CE 10.004

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Coronary Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Citalopram

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings