Misoprostol Prior to Intrauterine Device (IUD) Insertion in Nulliparous Women (miso)
A Randomized Control Trial of Misoprostol Versus Placebo for Cervical Priming in Intrauterine Device Insertion for Nulliparous Women
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Georgia
-
Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
- The Emory Clinic
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years
- negative pregnancy test
- no prior pregnancy beyond 19 6/7 weeks
- no pelvic inflammatory disease in last 3 months
- no current cervicitis
- willing to follow up in 1-2 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- active cervical infection
- current pregnancy
- prior pregnancy beyond 19 6/7 weeks
- uterine anomaly
- fibroid uterus distorting uterine cavity
- copper allergy or wilson's disease for ParaGard
- undiagnosed abnormal uterine bleeding
- cervical or uterine cancer
- sepsis associated with the most recent pregnancy
- current breast cancer for levonogestrel IUD
- inflammatory bowel disease
- allergy to misoprostol
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: misoprostol
Misoprostol 400mcg taken buccally 2 hours prior to IUD insertion visit
|
400mcg of misoprostol taken buccally 2 hours prior to IUD insertion visit
|
|
Placebo Comparator: placebo
Pill that is identical to the study drug in appearance, taste, and smell, taken buccally 2 hours prior to IUD insertion visit
|
Pill that is identical to the study drug in appearance, taste and smell, taken buccally 2 hours prior to IUD insertion visit
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Provider Perceived Ease of Insertion on a 100 Point Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: assessed immediately post IUD insertion
|
The visual analogue scale for perceived ease ranges from 0 (most ease) to 100 (most difficult).
|
assessed immediately post IUD insertion
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient Perceived Pain on a 100 Point Visual Analogue Scale
Time Frame: immediately after insertion
|
The visual analogue scale for perceived patient pain ranges from 0 (no pain) to 100 (most pain).
|
immediately after insertion
|
|
The Use of Adjunctive Measures Including Ultrasound Guidance or Cervical Dilation to Insert the IUD
Time Frame: assessed immediately after IUD insertion
|
assessed immediately after IUD insertion
|
|
|
Time for Insertion Procedure
Time Frame: assessed immediately after IUD insertion
|
assessed immediately after IUD insertion
|
|
|
Acceptability of Discomfort Associated With Insertion
Time Frame: assessed at one week after insertion and at one month after insertion
|
assessed at one week after insertion and at one month after insertion
|
|
|
Ease of Insertion and Presence of Pain in Nulliparous Women Versus Nulligravid Women
Time Frame: assessed immediately following insertion
|
assessed immediately following insertion
|
|
|
Need for Additional Pain Medications After Insertion of the IUD
Time Frame: assessed one week after insertion
|
assessed one week after insertion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Eva Lathrop, MD, MPH, Emory University School of Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Turok DK, Espey E, Edelman AB, Lotke PS, Lathrop EH, Teal SB, Jacobson JC, Simonsen SE, Schulz KF. The methodology for developing a prospective meta-analysis in the family planning community. Trials. 2011 Apr 29;12:104. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-104.
- Lathrop E, Haddad L, McWhorter CP, Goedken P. Self-administration of misoprostol prior to intrauterine device insertion among nulliparous women: a randomized controlled trial. Contraception. 2013 Dec;88(6):725-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2013.07.011. Epub 2013 Aug 6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB00021303
- MISO Emory (Other Identifier: Other)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.