Topical Metronidazole and Miconazole Co-formulated Vaginal Suppositories for Preventing Vaginal Infections in HIV-seronegative Women

September 26, 2014 updated by: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

A Double-Blind, Randomized Trial of Monthly Treatment With Topical Metronidazole and Miconazole Co-formulated Vaginal Suppositories Versus Placebo for Preventing Vaginal Infections in HIV-seronegative Women

This research study is about vaginal infections such as bacterial vaginosis, yeast infections, and trichomoniasis. Usually, these infections can be treated with medication, but sometimes they come back after treatment. Researchers want to know if using vaginal suppositories can decrease the risk of vaginal infections. Participants will include 234 women who are sexually active (greater than or equal to 4 episodes of sex with men during the past month), HIV-negative, 18 to 45 years old, with bacterial infection [vaginosis and/or vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and/or Trichomonas vaginalis] detected by laboratory testing at a screening visit. Women will receive vaginal suppositories containing drug or inactive ingredients (placebo). Participation in the study will be about 12 months. Study procedures include: urine and blood tests, physical exams, and questionnaires.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Vaginal infections including bacterial vaginosis (BV), vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC), and Trichomonas (T.) vaginalis are common and have been associated with increased risk of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections (STIs) in multiple prospective studies. Effective interventions for prevention of vaginal infections could substantially reduce the risk of HIV and other STIs in women. A recently completed trial has demonstrated that monthly periodic presumptive treatment (PPT) can reduce vaginal infections and promote Lactobacillus colonization. However, the oral regimen of metronidazole 2 grams plus fluconazole 150 mg was not sufficiently effective to warrant moving to Phase III HIV/STI prevention trials using this intervention. The identification of more efficacious regimens for reducing vaginal infections is a crucial step towards the development of inexpensive, female-controlled, non-coitally dependent HIV/STI risk reduction interventions for women. There is growing evidence that higher doses and longer courses may be more effective for treatment of vaginal infections than single-dose therapy. The overall goal of this protocol is to conduct a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy of monthly PPT with topical metronidazole 750 mg plus miconazole 200 mg (co-formulated suppositories) versus matching placebo suppositories nightly for five nights each month for reducing the rates of BV and VVC among HIV-seronegative women. This regimen could produce sufficient reductions in vaginal infections to support its use in Phase III HIV and STI prevention trials. The study participants will include 234 women who are sexually active (greater than or equal to 4 episodes of heterosexual intercourse during the past month), HIV-seronegative, 18 to 45 years old, with BV and/or VVC and/or T. vaginalis detected by laboratory testing at a screening visit. There will be two study arms. The treatment arm (117 subjects) will receive PPT with intravaginal metronidazole 750 mg plus miconazole 200 mg (co-formulated suppositories) for five consecutive nights each month. The placebo arm (117 subjects) will receive PPT with identical placebo intravaginal suppositories for five consecutive nights each month. Individual participants will be in the study for one year.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
234

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Kenya
      • Nairobi, Kenya
        • University of Nairobi - Center for STD/HIV Research & Training
      • Nairobi, Kenya
        • University of Nairobi - Kenya AIDS Vaccine Initiative
    • Coast
      • Mombasa, Coast, Kenya
        • Women's Health Project - Ganjoni Municipal Clinic
  • United States
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35294-0007
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 45 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent obtained and informed consent form (ICF) signed.
  • Female, aged 18-45 years.
  • Sexually active with greater than or equal to 4 episodes of sex with a male partner during the past month.
  • Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seronegative on both HIV tests in parallel screening.

  • Presence of bacterial vaginosis (BV) and/or vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and/or T. vaginalis infection at screening:

    1. BV: Microscopic criteria (Nugent's score greater than or equal to 7)
    2. VVC: Fungal elements (pseudohyphae, blastoconidia, or both) on vaginal saline wet mount plus a positive culture showing yeast on Sabouraud's agar.
    3. T. vaginalis infection: Identification of motile trichomonads on vaginal saline wet preparation.
  • Able and willing to comply with study visit schedule and procedures during the 12-month period of follow-up.
  • Able and willing to abstain from sex or to use non-latex condoms (provided) for 24 hours following insertion of each vaginal suppository.
  • Willing to abstain from alcohol during, and for 48 hours after, treatment.
  • Plan to remain in study area for the next year.
  • Agree to not participate in other research studies involving drugs, medical devices, or vaginal products for the duration of study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Currently pregnant (positive urine Beta-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (hCG) or planning to conceive during the next 12 months (by self-report).
  • Currently breastfeeding.
  • Within first 3 months post-partum.
  • Current menstruation - women who are currently menstruating may be enrolled following the completion of menses.
  • History of 4 or more episodes of treatment for any vaginal infection in the past 12 months. This would be a cumulative total, including any treatment for bacterial vaginosis (BV) and/or vulvovaginal candidiasis (VVC) and/or Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) and/or syndromic.

  • History of medical condition that would contraindicate use of the study product

    1. Porphyria
    2. Epilepsy
    3. Serious liver disease or signs and symptoms consistent with serious liver disease including jaundice, ascites, esophageal varices, encephalopathy, and bleeding disorders.
    4. Renal failure
  • History of adverse reaction to the study medications (intravaginal metronidazole or miconazole).

  • Current use of medication that may interact with the study drug (due to vaginal absorption of study drug)

    1. Warfarin
    2. Phenytoin
    3. Phenobarbital
    4. Disulfiram
    5. Cimetidine
    6. Lithium
    7. Astemizole
    8. Terfenadine
  • Current use of oral or intravaginal antifungal medication.
  • Current use of oral or intravaginal metronidazole, tinidazole, or clindamycin.
  • Current use of latex diaphragm.
  • As determined by the investigator, a medical condition or situation exists such that study participation would not be advisable.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Arm 1
Intravaginal metronidazole 750 mg plus miconazole 200 mg (co-formulated suppositories) nightly for 5 consecutive nights each month; 117 Subjects.
Drug: Neo-Penotran® Forte (active ingredient Metronidazole & Miconazole Nitrate)
Neo-Penotran® Forte (active ingredient Metronidazole & Miconazole Nitrate), co-formulated vaginal suppositories containing metronidazole 750 mg with miconazole 200 mg and excipients (Witepsol S 55). Witepsol S 55 is a hard fat suppository base. Such bases consist mainly of triglyceride esters of the higher saturated fatty acids along with varying proportions of mono- and diglycerides. 117 subjects receive nightly for 5 consecutive night each month.
Placebo Comparator: Arm 2
Placebo suppositories nightly for five consecutive nights each month; 117 Subjects.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo vaginal suppositories, identical in appearance to the active product; contains Witepsol S 55, Titanium Dioxide and D+C yellow #10 with no metronidazole or miconazole.117 subjects receive nightly for 5 consecutive nights each month.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of Monthly Periodic Presumptive Treatment (PPT) Using Metronidazole With Miconazole Intravaginal Suppositories Versus Matching Placebo Nightly for Five Nights Each Month for Preventing Vulvovaginal Candidiasis (VVC).
Time Frame: Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.
Percentage of follow-up visits (Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12) positive for VVC based on the presence of fungal elements (pseudohyphae, blastoconidia, or both) on vaginal saline wet mount plus a positive culture showing yeast on Sabouraud's agar.
Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.
Efficacy of Monthly Periodic Presumptive Treatment (PPT) Using Metronidazole With Miconazole Intravaginal Suppositories Versus Matching Placebo Nightly for Five Nights Each Month for Preventing Bacterial Vaginosis (BV).
Time Frame: Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.
Percentage of follow-up visits (Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12) positive for BV as determined by applying standard microscopic scoring criteria (Nugent's criteria) to vaginal Gram stained slides. BV is diagnosed when the score is greater than or equal to 7.
Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Efficacy of Monthly Periodic Presumptive Treatment (PPT) Using Metronidazole With Miconazole Intravaginal Suppositories Versus Placebo for Preventing Any Vaginal Infection (a Combined Endpoint Including BV, VVC, and Trichomonas Vaginalis Infection).
Time Frame: Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.
Percentage of follow-up visits (Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12) positive for any of three vaginal infections (BV, VVC, Trichomonas vaginalis infection).
Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.
Efficacy of Monthly Periodic Presumptive Treatment (PPT) Using Metronidazole With Miconazole Intravaginal Suppositories Versus Matching Placebo Nightly for Five Nights Each Month for Preventing BV by Clinical Criteria (Amsel's Criteria).
Time Frame: Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.
Percentage of follow-up visits (Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12) positive for BV by clinical criteria (Amsel's criteria).
Months 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 28, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 29, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 6, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 26, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 09-0070
  • DMID STI CTG 09-0070 PVI

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings