Vaginal Uphold Hysteropexy and Laparoscopic Sacral Hysteropexy for the Treatment of Uterovaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse (VAULT)

June 13, 2016 updated by: The Cleveland Clinic
The purpose of this study is to evaluate surgical success or failure one year after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This will be a prospective parallel cohort study comparing a laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy (LSHP) to a vaginal Uphold hysteropexy (VUHP). Symptomatic and anatomic improvement of pelvic organ prolapse will be evaluated at 3 months and 1 year.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
148

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z1Y6
        • Providence Healthcare
  • United States
    • California
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States, 20010
        • Washington Hospital
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21204
        • Greater Baltimore Medical Center
    • North Carolina
      • Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States, 27599
        • UNC
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45069
        • The Christ Hospital
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44195
        • Cleveland Clinic
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02903
        • Women & Infant's Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult women with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse planning to undergo laparsocopic sacral hysteropexy or vaginal uphold hysteropexy

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Desires surgical treatment for uterovaginal prolapse.
  • Symptomatic stage II-IV POP including:
  • cystocele (AA or BA > or = 0) by POP-Q and
  • apical descent below the mid-vagina (point C > -(TVL / 2)) by the POP-Q and
  • a positive response to questions 3 of the PFDI 20: Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area? (Appendix A)
  • Eligible for and undergoing one of the following procedures: laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy (LSHP) or Vaginal Uphold hysteropexy (VUHP)
  • Female age 40 to 75.
  • Completed childbearing confirmed by subject or practicing reliable form of birth control defined as permanent sterilization, hormonal contraception, abstinence, IUD.
  • Normal size uterus (length less than 10 cm) on bimanual exam or ultrasound within the past 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior hysterectomy.
  • Patient with synthetic material placed to augment previous pelvic organ prolapse repair. (previous prolapse repair without synthetic mesh is acceptable).
  • Current vaginal or pelvic foreign body complications (including but not limited to erosion, fistula, abscess). This includes foreign bodies of any type (e.g. synthetic and biologic including allograft, xenograft).
  • Desires hysterectomy at the time of prolapse repair.
  • Cervical elongation with anticipated need for cervical shortening at the time of prolapse repair as determined by surgeon.
  • History of cervical dysplasia (diagnosed within the past 5 years) or increased risk of cervical dysplasia (HIV, immunocompromise, DES exposure), chronic pelvic pain, uterine abnormalities (symptomatic uterine fibroids, polyps, endometrial hyperplasia, cancer) or any uterine disease that would preclude prolapse repair with uterine preservation in the opinion of the surgeon.
  • Any postmenopausal bleeding in the past 12 months (regardless of endometrial biopsy or ultrasound results) or any postmenopausal bleeding more than 12 months prior without adequate evaluation in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Premenopausal women with menstrual issues including irregular bleeding, menorrhagia, dysmenorrhea,
  • Pregnancy (confirmed before surgery with a pregnancy test).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy
Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy is performed laparoscopically with or without robotic assistance
Device: Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy
Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy is performed laparoscopically with or without robotic assistance
Vaginal mesh hysteropexy
Vaginal Mesh Hysteropexy using the Uphold device which includes Sacrospinous Ligament Fixation
Device: Vaginal mesh hysteropexy
Uphold device used which includes sacrospinous ligament fixation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The primary outcome measure will be surgical "success" or "failure" as a dichotomous outcome 1 year after surgery. Subjects will be considered a success if they meet the definitions of anatomic cure and deny vaginal bulging symptoms.
Time Frame: 12 months

Anatomic sure is defined as cervix above mid-vagina, and no prolapse beyond the hymen and no surgical treatment for pelvic organ prolapse or pessary use.

Symptomatic cure is defined as the absence of vaginal bulge symptoms as indicated by a negative response question 3 of the pelvic floor distress inventory- 20.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anatomic outcomes
Time Frame: 12 months
Evaluation of the anterior and posterior walls using point Aa, Ba, Ap and Bp, C, posterior fornix D and total vaginal length TVL; evaluate the size of the genital hiatus and perineal body; evaluation of cervical elongation and record any additional surgical procedures for anterior and posterior vaginal wall prolapse.
12 months
Symptomatic improvement
Time Frame: 3months and 12 months
Relief of symptoms of pelvic floor disorders, including incontinence, voiding dysfunction, pelvic organ prolapse, fecal incontinence defecation disorders and sexual dysfunction using validated instruments collected postoperatively at 3 months, and 1 year.
3months and 12 months
Shortterm morbidity
Time Frame: 6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months
We will compare the treatment groups with respect to perioperative morbidity and mortality. Perioperative morbidity will be recorded at completion of surgery and at hospital discharge. Postoperative morbidity will be recorded at any time after discharge- 6 weeks, 3 months and 1 year and all adverse events will be documented. Perioperative measures of morbidity will include operative time, estimated blood loss, and complications. Length of hospital stay will also be recorded. Complications will be categorized using the Dindo surgical complication grading scale.
6 weeks, 3 months, 12 months
Pain and functional activity
Time Frame: 6 weeks and 6 months
Postoperative pain- subjects will complete the modified surgical pain scale and a diary of pain medication use preoperatively, then daily for two weeks after surgery, then again at 6 weeks postoperatively. Postoperative functional activity level- subjects will complete the activity assessment scale which measures postoperative functional activity preoperatively, 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery.
6 weeks and 6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
The Cleveland Clinic

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Stanford University
The Christ Hospital
Medstar Health Research Institute
Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island
Greater Baltimore Medical Center
University of North Carolina
Providence Healthcare

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Robert E Gutman, MD, Medstar Health Research Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
June 10, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 20, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
June 21, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 13, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 11-409

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings