Prevention of Alcohol Related Incidents in the US Air Force (AFIV)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Texas
-
Lackland Air Force Base, Texas, United States, 78236
- 37th Training Group
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: PREVENTION
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Group Brief Alcohol Booster Intervention
The 1-hour booster intervention was delivered using MI to extend the effective elements found in the original BAI intervention with elements from behavioral economic theory.
A behavioral economic approach to alcohol use suggests that decisions to drink are more likely when 1) there is a lack of access to or engagement in alternative alcohol-free reinforcing activities, and 2) there is a greater relative focus on immediate, relative to delayed, rewards (i.e., steep delayed reward discounting).
The intent of the intervention is to bring important long-term goals into the present so that the immediate awareness of this goal might diminish the relative benefit of drinking.
Another goal was to have the Airmen identify enjoyable and goal-consistent alcohol-free activities they could engage in during their free time.
The booster also included a reminder of the U.S. Air Forces rules and policies on alcohol use and harm reduction drinking strategies.
|
The BAI contained components of effective interventions developed for young adult drinkers both in health care and educational settings and was specifically tailored to the unique needs and risk factors of Airmen.
The 1-hour group intervention was administered using the principles of motivational interviewing (MI) in an interactive Socratic style to generate feedback and discussion.
Open-ended questions, reflections, as well as the decisional balance scale were used to increase Airmen's motivation to remain alcohol free.
The 1-hour booster intervention was delivered using MI to extend the effective elements found in the original BAI intervention with elements from behavioral economic theory.
A behavioral economic approach to alcohol use suggests that decisions to drink are more likely when 1) there is a lack of access to or engagement in alternative alcohol-free reinforcing activities, and 2) there is a greater relative focus on immediate, relative to delayed, rewards (i.e., steep delayed reward discounting).
The intent of the intervention is to bring important long-term goals into the present so that the immediate awareness of this goal might diminish the relative benefit of drinking.
Another goal was to have the Airmen identify enjoyable and goal-consistent alcohol-free activities they could engage in during their free time.
The booster also included a reminder of the U.S. Air Forces rules and policies on alcohol use and harm reduction drinking strategies.
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Bystander Intervention
The 1-hour Bystander intervention was a non-alcohol related briefing that served as the control condition.
The intervention focused on increasing Airmen's awareness of the qualities of being a good "wingman" (e.g., watching for their peers) and how those are tied to the Air Force Core Values.
It aimed to increase participants' perceived responsibility to act in certain situations.
The intervention draws on the philosophy that members in a community have a role in shifting social norms to prevent violence.
While the intervention did not directly discuss alcohol use, the focus on military values and taking responsibility for one's self and others could contribute to healthier drinking-related choices.
|
The BAI contained components of effective interventions developed for young adult drinkers both in health care and educational settings and was specifically tailored to the unique needs and risk factors of Airmen.
The 1-hour group intervention was administered using the principles of motivational interviewing (MI) in an interactive Socratic style to generate feedback and discussion.
Open-ended questions, reflections, as well as the decisional balance scale were used to increase Airmen's motivation to remain alcohol free.
The 1-hour Bystander intervention was a non-alcohol related briefing that served as the control condition.
The intervention focused on increasing Airmen's awareness of the qualities of being a good "wingman" (e.g., watching for their peers) and how those are tied to the Air Force Core Values.
It aimed to increase participants' perceived responsibility to act in certain situations.
The intervention draws on the philosophy that members in a community have a role in shifting social norms to prevent violence (Coker et al., 2011).
While the intervention did not directly discuss alcohol use, the focus on military values and taking responsibility for one's self and others could contribute to healthier drinking-related choices.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Article 15s
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Adjudicated alcohol related incident in the United States Air Force (Article 15).
We determined if an Airmen had received an Article 15 in the year following Technical Training by searching the Automated Military Justice Analysis and Management System (AMJAMS).
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Robert C. Klesges, Ph.D., University of Virginia
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- FWH20140105H
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.