PEEK and Allograft Spacers Evaluation in Spinal Fusion Surgeries (PEEK)

February 25, 2019 updated by: Justin Parker Neurological Institute

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing PEEK and Allograft Spacers in Patients Undergoing Spinal Intervertebral Fusion Surgeries

Purpose The primary purpose of this study is to prospectively compare clinical and radiographic clinical outcomes in patients undergoing cervical or lumbar interbody fusions and randomized to receive either polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or cortical allografts.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Following surgery study subjects will be evaluated at the following intervals: 3 (+/- 2 weeks), 6 (+/- 1 month), 12 (+/- 2 months), 24 (+/- 2 months) months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
240

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Colorado
      • Boulder, Colorado, United States, 80304
        • Boulder Neurosurgical Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Boulder Neurosurgical Associates patients

Description

Lumbar Fusion Patient Group

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Skeletally mature adults between 18 and 70 years old
  • Patients with back and leg pain due to degenerative disc disease, scheduled for TLIF/PLIF approach utilizing an interbody spacer and supplemental posterior fixation at 1, 2 or 3 adjacent levels
  • Unresponsive to conservative care over a period of at least 6 months or has progressive neurological signs and/or symptoms of neurological compromise that mandate urgent surgical intervention
  • Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol including followup requirements
  • Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than 3 intervertebral levels to be fused
  • Posterior fixation used at more than 1 level for 1-level intervertebral fusion
  • Posterior fixation used at more than 2 levels for 2-level intervertebral fusion
  • Posterior fixation used at more than 3 levels for 3-level intervertebral fusion
  • Any additional approaches, e.g. anterior, XLIF
  • Active local or systemic infection
  • Prior interbody fusion surgery at the index level
  • Prior fusion at the adjacent levels
  • Previous known allergy to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or titanium alloy

Cervical Fusion Patient Group

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Skeletally mature adults between 18 and 70 years old
  • Patients with neck and/or arm pain due to degenerative disc disease, scheduled for ACDF approach utilizing an interbody spacer and anterior cervical plate at 1, 2 or 3 adjacent levels
  • Completed at least 6 weeks of conservative therapy or has progressive neurological signs and/or symptoms of neurological compromise that mandate urgent surgical intervention
  • Willing and able to comply with the requirements of the protocol including followup requirements
  • Willing and able to sign a study specific informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than 3 vertebral levels to be fused
  • Any additional approaches, e.g. posterior cervical fusion
  • Active local or systemic infection
  • Prior interbody fusion surgery at the index level
  • Prior fusion at the adjacent level
  • Previous known allergy to polyetheretherketone (PEEK) or titanium alloy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Control
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
PEEK cages
Patients will have fusion surgery performed using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages
Procedure: Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (P/TLIF), Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)
Lumbar or cervical fusion
Allograft spacers
Patients will have fusion surgery performed using allograft spacers
Procedure: Posterior/Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (P/TLIF), Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF)
Lumbar or cervical fusion

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Intensity Scores
Time Frame: 24 (+/- 2) months
Improvement in the Neck/Arm or Low Back/Leg Visual Analog pain Scale (VAS) scores. A 30% reduction in pain intensity will be considered to be a successful response to treatment.
24 (+/- 2) months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes
Time Frame: 3 (+/-2) weeks and 24 (+/- 2) months
  • Assessment of Neck or Lower Back Disability Scores
  • Assessment of SF-36 Health Survey
  • Assessment of restoration of vertebral height, sagittal alignment, and graft subsidence
  • Assessment of fusion rates
3 (+/-2) weeks and 24 (+/- 2) months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Justin Parker Neurological Institute

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Alan T Villavicencio, MD, Boulder Neurosurgical Associates

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 16, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 16, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
July 27, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
July 29, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 27, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 25, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
February 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • JPNI2001-2

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings