Nepafenac Compared to Placebo for Ocular Pain and Inflammation

May 10, 2013 updated by: Alcon Research

Clinical Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension, 0.1% Compared to Placebo for the Prevention and Treatment of Ocular Inflammation and Pain Associated With Cataract Surgery in Adult Chinese Subjects

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate that Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension, 0.1% is superior to Nepafenac Vehicle (placebo) for the prevention and treatment of ocular inflammation and pain associated with cataract surgery in Chinese subjects.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
260

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • China
    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult Chinese subjects, 18 years of age or older, of either sex who have a cataract, and are expected to undergo cataract extraction with the implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens;
  • Study eye of subjects, who in the opinion of the Investigator, will have improvement in best-corrected visual acuity after surgery;
  • Subjects should be able to understand and sign an informed consent that has been approved by an Independent Ethics Committee;
  • Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of topical ocular or systemic steroids within 14 days prior to surgery;
  • Use of topical ocular or systemic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs within 7 days of surgery, except an allowed daily dose of baby aspirin (81 mg);
  • Subjects planning to have cataract surgery in their fellow, non-study eye prior to the 14 day postoperative study visit;
  • Any intraocular inflammation or ocular pain greater than Grade 0 in the study eye that is present during the baseline slit-lamp exam;

  • Women of childbearing potential (those who are not surgically sterilized or post menopausal) may not participate in the study if any of the following conditions exist:

    • they are breast feeding;
    • they have a positive urine pregnancy test at baseline;
    • they are not willing to undergo a urine pregnancy test upon exiting the study;
    • they intend to become pregnant during the duration of the study; or,
    • they do not agree to using adequate birth control methods for the duration of the study.
  • Any abnormality that prevents reliable tonometry;
  • Planned multiple procedures during cataract/IOL implantation surgery;
  • Lens pseudoexfoliation syndrome with glaucoma or zonular compromise;
  • Previous ocular trauma to the operative eye;
  • A history of chronic or recurrent inflammatory eye disease;
  • Ocular infection or ocular pain;
  • Proliferative diabetic retinopathy;
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus;
  • Congenital ocular anomaly;
  • Iris atrophy in the operative eye;
  • A nonfunctional fellow eye;
  • Use of an investigational intraocular lens;
  • Participation in any other clinical study within 30 days before surgery;
  • Known or suspected allergy or hypersensitivity to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, or to any component of the study medication;
  • Subjects with known bleeding tendencies, or who are receiving medications that may prolong bleeding time, may be enrolled at the physician's discretion; continuation of previous therapy for these subjects will be left to the judgment of the physician;
  • The fellow eye of an individual currently or previously enrolled in the study;
  • Subjects using a topical ophthalmic prostaglandin;
  • Subjects, who in the opinion of the investigator, might be at increased risk of complications from topical NSAIDs;
  • Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Nepafenac
Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension, 0.1%, 1 drop to the operative eye, 3 times a day, beginning 1 day preoperatively and continuing through the day of surgery and for 14 days postoperatively. An additional dose was administered prior to surgery.
Drug: Nepafenac Ophthalmic Suspension, 0.1%
Topical ocular administration
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Nepafenac Vehicle, 1 drop to the operative eye, 3 times a day, beginning 1 day preoperatively and continuing through the day of surgery and for 14 days postoperatively. An additional dose was administered prior to surgery.
Other: Nepafenac Vehicle Ophthalmic Solution
Inactive ingredients used as placebo; topical ocular administration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects With Clinical Cure at Day 14
Time Frame: Day 14 postoperative
Ocular inflammation was assessed by the Investigator during slit lamp examination. Aqueous cells were scored on a 5-unit scale from 0 (none) to 4 (>30 cells), and aqueous flare (protein escaping from dilated vessels) was scored on a 4-unit scale from 0 (no visible flare when compared with the normal eye) to 3 (severe - very dense flare). To be considered cured, the patient must have had a score of 0 for both aqueous cells and aqueous flare. The proportion of subjects with a clinical cure is reported as percentage.
Day 14 postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Subjects Who Were Pain-Free at All Postoperative Visits
Time Frame: Up to Day 14
Ocular pain is defined as a positive sensation of the eye, including foreign body sensation, stabbing, throbbing, or aching. The Investigator scored ocular pain based on the description of pain by the subject. Pain was scored on a 6-unit scale ranging from 0 (none, absence of positive sensation) to 5 (severe, subject reports intense ocular, periocular or radiating pain requiring prescription analgesic). To be considered pain-free at all post operative visits, the patient must have had a score of 0 at Days 1, 3, 7, and 14 and any unscheduled visit. The proportion of subjects who were pain-free at all post-operative visits is reported as percentage.
Up to Day 14

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Alcon Research

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Director: Mandy Ye, Director, Alcon (China) Ophthalmic Product Co., Ltd.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
July 1, 2011

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 30, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 31, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 1, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 13, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 10, 2013

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • C-10-026

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings