Outcomes Comparison of Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura (ITP) Patients Switched to Eltrombopag and Romiplostim

June 21, 2012 updated by: GlaxoSmithKline
Chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is characterized by low platelet counts and the risk of severe bleeding complications. The two recently introduced TPO-RA drugs, namely, eltrombopag and romiplostim, have shown efficacious sustained response with continuous administration. Both drugs are indicated for the treatment of thrombocytopia in patients with chronic ITP who have had an insufficient response to corticosteroids, immunoglobulins, or splenectomy. While these trials address important clinical questions they were not intended to evaluate what happens in the real-world settings with actual patient living daily lives. The purpose of this health outcomes study is to understand how the two TPO receptor agonists (TPO-RA) currently available in the US are being used in clinical practice and how their use impacts chronic ITP patients' daily lives. The study hypothesis is that patients who switched to eltrombopag report a better health-related quality of life than those who switched to romiplostim. This study utilized a hybrid design of retrospective chart review study and cross-sectional patient survey. A customized Patient Case Report Form (CRF) will be used to retrospectively collect clinical data from patient medical charts where the primary cohorts consist of patients who have switched from other ITP medication to eltrombopag or romiplostim. A cross-sectional survey will be employed to collect patient reported outcomes (PRO) data, including health-related quality of life and treatment satisfaction, using a compository questionnaire. Analyses of cross-sectional survey data and retrospective medical chart review data in patients who switch to either eltrombopag or romiplostim from their prior primary therapy will be conducted.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
280

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Study population will include adult patients with a diagnosis of immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) who switched to eltrombopag or romiplostim.

Description

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults 18 years and older diagnosed with chronic ITP
  • Switched to eltrombopag or romiplostim a minimum of 4 weeks prior to index date
  • Received corticosteroids, rituximab, or one TPO-receptor agonist as prior primary therapy before switching to eltrombopag or romiplostim
  • Medical history must be available from chronic ITP diagnosis through to most recent office visit
  • Patients who complete the self-administered questionnaire were the same patients whose medical charts were reviewed

Exclusion criteria

  • Age less than 18 years old

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Patient with Chronic Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura
Patients with chronic ITP who switch from their previous treatment of corticosteroids, rituximab, or eltrombopag or romiplostim to eltrombopag or romiplostim and have been on the new treatment for at least four weeks
Biological: Eltrombopag
Switched to Eltrombopag
Other Names:
  • Promacta® is a registered trademark of GlaxoSmithKline
Biological: Romiplostim
Switched to Romiplostim
Other Names:
  • Nplate® is a registered trademark of Amgen

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
treatment satisfaction scores by domain
Time Frame: During a 5 month period, the questionnaire will be administered to each participant at one time point. The recall period for the TQSM in this study is 3 weeks
Treatment satisfaction will be captured with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM). The questionnaire is composed of 14 items. Mean scores will be reported for each treatment group by domain. The domains of the TSQM are effectiveness, side effects, convenience, and global satisfaction
During a 5 month period, the questionnaire will be administered to each participant at one time point. The recall period for the TQSM in this study is 3 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Short-form 36 (SF-36) score
Time Frame: During a 5 month period, the questionnaire will be administered to each participant at one time point. The recall period for the SF-36 in this study is 1 week
The SF-36 is a general overall health instrument consisting of eight scaled scores, which are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. Scales include general health, limitations of activities, physical functioning, emotional health, social activities, pain, and energy/ emotional functioning. Scores for social functioning and physicial functioning will also be reported
During a 5 month period, the questionnaire will be administered to each participant at one time point. The recall period for the SF-36 in this study is 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
GlaxoSmithKline

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2010

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2011

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
September 21, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 21, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 23, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 25, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
June 21, 2012

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
June 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 113922

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings