Extracolonic Findings on Computed Tomography (CT) Colonography (ACRIN7151)

October 9, 2018 updated by: American College of Radiology Imaging Network

Incidence and Significance of Extracolonic Findings on CT Colonography: Retrospective Analysis of "National CT Colonography Trial" Data

The ACRIN 7151 trial will use medical records abstraction data from participants with extracolonic findings (ECFs) reported from the ACRIN 6664 National CT Colonography Trial to: 1) measure incidence of diagnostic imaging, hospitalization, and interventional procedures associated with ECFs reported on computed tomography colonography (CTC), delineated by type of ECF; 2) determine potential predictors of follow-up diagnostic imaging, hospitalization, and interventional procedures, delineated by type of ECF; and 3) evaluate the clinical/pathologic diagnoses associated with indeterminate but potentially significant ECFs. These data can be used to incorporate ECFs into existing models on the cost-effectiveness of CTC in colorectal cancer screening and can potentially be used to develop guidelines for the reporting and management of ECFs.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

The original ACRIN 6664 National CT Colonography Trial included 15 participating sites and a total study data set of 2531 participants. The target study data set for the ACRIN 7151 trial is 520 participants, assigned to one of three cohorts: an E3/E4 Case Group (n = 141) excluding pulmonary nodules, an E3/E4 Pulmonary Nodules Case Group (n = 119), and an E1 Control Group (n = 260) (see Section 8.6). Medical records will be collected by the site from their institutions and from the primary care provider identified by the participant during the ACRIN 6664 trial. Initial record collection will comprise the six months following CTC for all cohorts. Additional medical record collection (from other primary care providers, specialists, and hospitals, and for extended time periods) may be necessary for primary endpoint determination. ECFs are categorized according to the original radiology read of the CTC during the ACRIN 6664 trial.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
520

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All participants originally enrolled in the ACRIN 6664 National CT Colonography Trial are eligible for the ACRIN 7151 trial. The target study data set for the ACRIN 7151 trial is 520 participants, assigned to one of three cohorts: an E3/E4 Case Group (n = 141) excluding pulmonary nodules, an E3/E4 Pulmonary Nodules Case Group (n = 119), and an E1 Control Group (n = 260).

Description

No participant sub-populations will be excluded prior to selection (the E1 population will be matched to the Case Group populations).

Data from the 15 participating sites from the ACRIN 6664 trial provide a study data set of 2531 participants, broken down into a total target study data set of 520 participants. Participants will be distributed into one of three cohorts as follows:

  • The Case Group will target consenting 141 participants from the cases with indeterminate but potentially significant findings (E3/E4s) other than pulmonary nodules.
  • The Pulmonary Nodules Case Group will comprise 119 cases with E3/E4 ECFs characterized as pulmonary nodules.
  • The E1 Control Group will be drawn from the 866 E1 ECF cases to create a cohort of 260 E1ECF cases. The Control Group for comparison with the Case Group and the Pulmonary Nodules Case Group will be selected at the Biostatistics and Data Management Center (BDMC). The BDMC will match E1 141 controls to the 141 case-group participants with indeterminate but potentially significant findings (E3/E4s). The BDMC will also match 119 E1 controls to the 119 E3/E4 pulmonary nodules cases. Controls will be matched by site, age caliper (5 years), and sex where possible. Where an appropriate match cannot be obtained, the matching criteria will be relaxed. If potential participants decline study consent, we will then best-match additional cases for the appropriate group to maintain target populations. Any additional cases beyond the initial 520 participants identified for medical record collection will be matched as feasible.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
E3/E4 Case Group
The Case Group will target consenting 141 participants from the cases with indeterminate but potentially significant findings (E3/E4s) other than pulmonary nodules.
Pulmonary Nodules Case Group
The Pulmonary Nodules Case Group will comprise 119 cases with E3/E4 ECFs characterized as pulmonary nodules.
E1 Control Group
The E1 Control Group will be drawn from the 866 E1 ECF cases from ACRIN 6664 to create a cohort of 260 E1 ECF cases. The Control Group for comparison with the Case Group and the Pulmonary Nodules Case Group will be selected at the Biostatistics and Data Management Center (BDMC). The BDMC will match E1 141 controls to the 141 case-group participants with indeterminate but potentially significant findings (E3/E4s). The BDMC will also match 119 E1 controls to the 119 E3/E4 pulmonary nodules cases. Controls will be matched by site, age caliper (5 years), and sex where possible.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rates of Follow Up Imaging, Hospitalization, Intervention
Time Frame: 6 Months, 15 Months
Estimate the rates of follow-up diagnostic imaging, hospitalization, and interventional procedures commonly associated with ECFs within six months of receiving CTC for all three cohorts (E3/E4, pulmonary nodules, and E1). Compare the rates of medical utilization among participants with indeterminate but potentially significant ECFs (E3/E4s) and participants with pulmonary nodules, to participants with no ECFs (E1s).
6 Months, 15 Months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Characterize Outcomes
Time Frame: 6 Months
Categorize the outcome of potentially clinically significant findings detected by CTC into resolved and unresolved, significant and insignificant at six-months post-examination based on medical record abstraction among participants with indeterminate but potentially clinically significant ECFs (E3/E4s) and participants with pulmonary nodules. Estimate the relationship between participant characteristics and clinically significant findings for participants with E3/E4 ECFs and participants with pulmonary nodules.
6 Months
Estimate Relative Risk
Time Frame: 6 Months
Estimate the relative risk of confirmed clinically significant findings within six months of receiving CTC among participants with indeterminate but potentially significant ECFs (E3/E4s) and participants with pulmonary nodules, compared with participants with no ECFs (E1s).
6 Months
Determine Potential Predictors
Time Frame: 6 Months
Determine potential predictors associated with increased likelihood of receiving follow-up diagnostic imaging, hospitalization, and interventional procedures within six months of receiving CTC among participants with indeterminate but potentially significant ECFs (E3/E4s), including participants with pulmonary nodules.
6 Months
Estimate Differences in Cost
Time Frame: 6 Months
Estimate differences in cost associated with common expected follow-up diagnostic imaging, hospitalizations, and interventional procedures within six months of receiving CTC among participants with indeterminate but potentially significant ECFs (E3/E4s) and participants with pulmonary nodules, compared with participants with no ECFs (E1s).
6 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
American College of Radiology Imaging Network

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Hanna M. Zafar, MD, MHS, University of Pennsylvania

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2011

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2019

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 31, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 3, 2011

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 4, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 11, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 9, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • ACRIN 7151
  • A7151 (OTHER: ACRIN Foundation)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Liver Neoplasms

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings