Capecitabine in the Perioperative Treatment of Rectal Cancer (Rektum-III)

November 24, 2020 updated by: Frederik Wenz, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

5-Fluorouracil Versus Capecitabine as Perioperative Treatment for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer. a Randomized Phase III Trial

This study compares capecitabine with standard 5-FU in the perioperative treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) based chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is regarded a standard perioperative treatment in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). We investigate the replacement of 5-FU by the oral pro-drug capecitabine (cape) within a randomized phase III trial. Patients aged ≥18 years with LARC stage II or III are recruited into this two-arm, two-cohort randomized non-inferiority phase-III trial (arm A: cape, arm B: 5-FU; cohort [C] I: adjuvant, C II: neoadjuvant). Regimens: Arm A: CRT: 50.4 Gy + cape 1,650 mg/m² days 1-38 plus five cycles of cape 2,500 mg/m² d 1-14, repeated d 22 (C I: 2 x cape, CRT, 3 x cape; C II: CRT, TME surgery followed by cape x 5). Arm B: CRT: 50.4 Gy + infusional 5-FU 225 mg/m² daily [C I] or infusional 5-FU 1,000 mg/m² d 1-5 and 29-33 [C II] plus 4 cycles of bolus 5-FU 500mg/m² d 1-5, repeated d 29 (C I: 2 x 5-FU, CRT, 2 x 5-FU; C II: CRT, TME surgery followed by 5-FU x 4). Primary endpoint is 5-year overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints comprise 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) and safety.

The study is designed to investigate whether 5- year overall survival rate (SR5) is non-inferior in arm A versus arm B. We hypothesize that SR5 in the standard arm B is 57.5%. Sample size calculation is performed with a power of 80% and a type I error of 5% and with a drop-out rate of 5%. Therefore, a total of at least 372 evaluable patients (i.e. 186 per arm) is required to confirm non-inferiority of the experimental arm A with a non-inferiority margin of maximal 12.5% and a median follow-up time of 48 months.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
401

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Aschersleben, Germany
        • Dr Martina Grunewald
      • Hagen, Germany
        • Dr Hans Walter Lindemann
      • Kaiserslautern, Germany
        • Prof Hartmut Link
      • Koblenz, Germany
        • Dr Elisabeth Fritz
      • Lebach, Germany
        • Dr Stephan Kremers
      • Leer, Germany
        • Dr Lothar Müller
      • Lemgo, Germany
        • Dr Christain Constantin
      • Magdeburg, Germany
        • Dr Erika Kettner
      • Mainz, Germany
        • Dr Markus Moehler
      • Mannheim, Germany
        • Dr Udo Hieber
      • Mannheim, Germany
        • Prof Ralf Hofheinz
      • Regensburg, Germany
        • Dr Matthias Hipp
      • Saarbrücken, Germany
        • Prof Axel Matzdorff
      • Tübingen, Germany
        • Dr Stephan Laechelt

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Eligible patients are 18 years or older and have histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the rectum (defined as the distal border of the tumour less than 16 cm from the anal verge measured by rigid rectoscopy) with no evidence of distant metastases (identified by abdominal ultrasound or CT scan and chest radiography).
  • Patients in the adjuvant cohort have undergone R0-resection by total mesorectal excision (TME) of a pT3-4 N any or T any N positive non-metastatic rectal cancer.
  • Patients treated in the neoadjuvant cohort need to have a clinical T3-4 N any or T any N positive tumour staged by endoscopic ultrasound, provided the lower border of the tumour is located 0 - 16 cm from the anal verge measured by rigid rectoscopy and the primary tumour is deemed resectable by TME surgery on the basis of clinical assessment. Other eligibility criteria comprise: WHO status of zero or one; adequate liver, renal, and bone marrow function defined as follows: leucocyte count > 3,500/µl, thrombocyte count > 100,000/µl, hemoglobin > 10.0 g/dl; serum bilirubin < 2.0 mg/dl, serum creatinine < 2.0 mg/dl.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Prior treatment for rectal cancer, prior chemo- or immunotherapy, prior pelvic radiotherapy, or a history of other malignant diseases within the past five years with the exception of successfully treated basal carcinoma of the skin or carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.
  • Participation in another trial, pregnancy, breast-feeding, unwillingness to use effective contraception, or a medical condition or concomitant illness which could potentially interfere with compliance to the protocol are regarded as exclusion criteria, as well.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)
Drug - 5FU based chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy
Drug: 5-FU
4 cycles of bolus 5-FU (500 mg/sqm) and 1 cycle of 5-FU based chemoradiotherapy (either 1,000 mg/sqm/day infusional 5-Fu days 1-5 and 29-33 or 225 mg/sqm/day infusional 5-Fu throughout the time of chemoradiotherapy)
Other Names:
  • 5-Fluorouracil
Experimental: Capecitabine
Drug - Capecitabine-based radiochemotherapy and chemotherapy
Drug: Capecitabine
Capecitabine standard therapy (i.e. 2,500 mg/sqm) x 5 cycles plus 1 cycle of capecitabine based chemoradiotherapy (1.650 mg/sqm)
Other Names:
  • Xeloda

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall survival
Time Frame: 5-year
5-year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: 3-year DFS
3-year DFS
Local recurrence rate
Time Frame: 5 years
Percentage of patient with local recurrence
5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Ralf Hofheinz, MD, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim Germany, University of Heidelberg
  • Study Chair: Frederik Wenz, MD, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Germany, University of Heidelberg
  • Study Chair: Stefan Post, MD, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Germany, University of Heidelberg
  • Study Chair: Andreas Hochhaus, MD, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Germany

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 21, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 26, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 29, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
November 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 24, 2020

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Rektum III

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings