Prefabricated Endodontic Posts: Glass Fiber Versus Titanium - A Randomized Controlled Pilot- Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Compared to vital teeth the complication rate of restorations fixed on endodontically treated abutment teeth is higher. Endodontically treated teeth are more prone to fracture due to the higher amount of calcified tooth structure loss. To level the biological short coming the choice of the mechanically appropriate post material is still a major concern. There a two major approaches. One is to use a rigid material to stiffen the post-endodontic complex and the other is to use a material which shows dentin-like material properties to allow the post-endodontic complex to flex under load. It was aim of the presented randomised controlled trial to compare the survival rates of abutment teeth self-adhesively restored with either prefabricated glass-fiber reinforced composite posts or titanium posts.
The null-hypothesis was that there is no difference regarding survival rate between glass-fiber and titanium post restored endodontically treated abutment teeth with two or less remaining cavity walls.
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Phase 4
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Berlin, Germany, 14197
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, CC3, Department of Prosthodontics, Geriatric Dentistry and Craniomandibular Disorders, Germany
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- two or less cavity walls of the crown remaining,
- residual root canal thickness at the orifice of more than 1 mm,
- symptom free tooth with a root canal filling without radiologically visible periapical lesion,
- minimum of radiologic root-to-alveolar bone ratio of 2 after prospective crown lengthening,
- no or treated periodontitis with maximum probing depth of 4 mm and no bleeding on probing,
- tooth mobility not more than score II,
- willingness to return for follow-up examination for at least 5 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- tooth was aimed to serve as telescopic crown abutment
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: glass fiber
|
posts: diameter of 1.4 mm; length of 13 mm adhesively luted within the root canal using self-adhesive resin cement and direct composite cores using an etch-and-rinse adhesive were built up crown preparation was performed, while the finishing line for the final restoration was set at least 2 mm apical the composite build-up in dentin to ensure a proper dentin ferrule design
Other Names:
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: titanium
|
posts: diameter of 1.4 mm; length of 13 mm adhesively luted within the root canal using self-adhesive resin cement and direct composite cores using an etch-and-rinse adhesive were built up crown preparation was performed, while the finishing line for the final restoration was set at least 2 mm apical the composite build-up in dentin to ensure a proper dentin ferrule design
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
loss of restoration for any reason
Time Frame: 84 months after post placement
|
The patients were recalled at 3, 6, 12 month and thereafter in al yearly recall up to 84 month after post placement for clinical examination.
The clinical examination was performed by one blinded dentist.
|
84 months after post placement
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
tooth loss, post debonding, post fracture, vertical or horizontal root fracture, endodontic or periradicular conditions requiring endodontic re-treatment, secondary caries and failure of core build-up and loss of restoration due to technical failures
Time Frame: 84 month after post placement
|
The clinical examination was performed by one blinded dentist.
Follow-up examinations were performed with a dental probe to detect marginal gap formation of restorations.
After 12 and 60 months radiographs were taken and examined by one operator (MN) to exclude the possibility of radiographic symptoms of failure, e.g.
periodontal or periapical lesions.
|
84 month after post placement
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Wounds and Injuries
- Stomatognathic Diseases
- Tooth Diseases
- Dental Pulp Diseases
- Tooth Injuries
- Tooth, Nonvital
- Tooth Fractures
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Adrenergic Agents
- Neurotransmitter Agents
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Autonomic Agents
- Peripheral Nervous System Agents
- Neurotransmitter Uptake Inhibitors
- Membrane Transport Modulators
- Dopamine Agents
- Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors
- Central Nervous System Stimulants
- Sympathomimetics
- Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors
- Methamphetamine
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CC3-7.103
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.