Robot Walking Rehabilitation in Parkinson's Disease (ROBOPARK)

April 9, 2024 updated by: IRCCS San Raffaele Roma

Use of a Robot for the Rehabilitation of Walking in Patients With Parkinson's Disease.

The effectiveness of non-pharmacological treatment on gait impairment on Parkinson Disease (PD) such as exercises has been demonstrated; in particular an example for patient tailored exercises is physiotherapy. The goal of physiotherapy treatment is to enable PD patients to maintain their maximum level of mobility, activity, and independence. Several systematic reviews and clinical studies have shown that physical therapy can contribute to minimize the disabling effects of motor and sensory impairments in order to enhance participation in societal roles and quality of life. The use of electromechanical devices such as treadmill training (a supplement to conventional therapies) in the last years has also been used with PD patients and a systematic Cochrane has been conducted by Mehrholz in 2010 to assess the effectiveness and acceptability of treadmill training in the treatment of gait disorders for patients with PD. In the last years new robotic assisted device can be used in gait training in neurological disorder. Till now only few studies, have focused on the effects of exoskeleton or end effector robot-assisted training in PD patients, with a interesting preliminary results.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The specific aims of this project are:

  1. to verify whether the robotics lower limb treatment with body weight support is more effective than the treadmill treatment in the reduction of motor impairment in PD or PSP patients, and to improve the quality of the gait and the endurance;
  2. to analyze possible improvements in terms of physiological biomechanical gait through analysis of kinematics , kinetics and EMG evaluation;
  3. to analyze possible improvements in terms of reduction of instable posture and movements , which can represent a reduction of the risk of fall typical of these subjects;
  4. to evaluate the kinematic, kinetic and EMG quantitative data during selected movements (gait, posture, ) compared with age matched reference data;
  5. to investigate the stability of the effects of robot-assisted treatment at 4/6 months follow-up in terms of Quality of Life (QoL).

A first goal of this project is to investigate the differences in improvement of the quality and safety of the gait (motor performance and functional recovery) through kinematic/kinetic and EMG parameters (Change in Step Length, Change in Gait Velocity and Change in Stride Time Variability, 3D joints kinematics, ground reaction forces, joint kinetics, muscle activation,) and traditional clinical scales in Parkinson's patients.

The second goals is aimed at identifying possible advantages in the QoL of patients undergoing such a kind of rehabilitation treatment and at investigating novel methods enabling lower limb functional recovery, leading to wide potential for regaining personal independence.

The third goal is to analyze direct cost savings associated with the use of such technologies, measured as direct, indirect and intangible costs, through specific HTA procedures.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
80

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Italy
      • Ancona, Italy
        • Polytecnic University of Marche
      • Cassino, Italy, 03043
        • San Raffaele Cassino
      • Rome, Italy, 00163
        • IRCCS San Raffaele Pisana

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic PD or PSP by UK Brain Bank criteria,
  • Age between 18-80;
  • Able to walk 25 feet unassisted or with minimal assistance;
  • On stable doses of Parkinson's medications for at least 2 weeks prior to study onset;
  • Endurance sufficient to stand at least 20 minutes unassisted per patient report.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other significant neurological or orthopedic problems.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Robot-Assisted Gait Training (RAGT)
Robot-Assisted Gait Training (RAGT): Subjects (at least 40) will undergo inpatient rehabilitation consisting of a treatment cycle using the GE-O system device, according to individually tailored exercise scheduling. The practice will include robot-assisted walking at variable speeds for 45 min with a partial body weight support (BWS). All participants started with 30-40% BWS and an initial treadmill speed of 1.5 km/h speed will be increased to a range of 2.2 to 2.5 km/h before BWS will be decreased.
Device: Robot-Assisted Gait Training (RAGT)
Subjects (at least 40 subjects) will undergo inpatient rehabilitation consisting of a treatment cycle using the GE-O system device, according to individually tailored exercise scheduling. The practice will include robot-assisted walking at variable speeds for 45 min with a partial body weight support (BWS). All participants started with 30-40% BWS and an initial treadmill speed of 1.5 km/h speed will be increased to a range of 2.2 to 2.5 km/h before BWS will be decreased.
Other Names:
  • End effector G-EO System
Active Comparator: Treadmill Gait Training (TT)
Treadmill Gait Training (TT): Subjects (at least 40) will undergo inpatient rehabilitation consisting of a treatment cycle using the treadmill device, according to individually tailored exercise scheduling. The practice included treadmill walking at variable speed for 45 minutes. All participants will start at an initial treadmill speed of 1.5 km/h speed will be increased to a range of 2.2 to 2.5 km/h.
Procedure: Treadmill Gait Training (TT)

Subjects (at least 40 subjects) will undergo inpatient rehabilitation consisting of a treatment cycle using the treadmill device, according to individually tailored exercise scheduling. The practice included treadmill walking at variable speed for 45 minutes. All participants will start at an initial treadmill speed of 1.5 km/h speed will be increased to a range of 2.2 to 2.5 km/h.

All the treatment consists of 20 sessions for the lower limbs, each lasting 45 minutes, 5 days a week for 4 weeks.

Other Names:
  • TREADMILL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6 minutes walking test.
Time Frame: Change from Baseline in gait speed at 6 months follow up.
The 6 minuts walking test as primary outcome assessments will be collected 1 hour after oral assumption of levodopa at baseline (inclusion)(T0) and endpoint (after 20 robot session) (T1) (no later than 1 day > last training session) at the follow-up examination after 6 months from the treatments conclusion (T2).
Change from Baseline in gait speed at 6 months follow up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time Up and Go test.
Time Frame: baseline, weekly during intervention, 6 months follow up.
Time Up and Go test will be collected 1 hour after oral assumption of levodopa at baseline (inclusion)(T0) and endpoint (after 20 robot session) (T1) (no later than 1 day > last training session) at the follow-up examination after 6 months from the treatments conclusion (T2).
baseline, weekly during intervention, 6 months follow up.
Gait Parameters
Time Frame: baseline, weekly during intervention, 6 months follow up.
Gait Analysis will be collected 1 hour after oral assumption of levodopa at baseline (inclusion)(T0) and endpoint (after 20 robot session) (T1) (no later than 1 day > last training session) at the follow-up examination after 6 months from the treatments conclusion (T2).
baseline, weekly during intervention, 6 months follow up.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
IRCCS San Raffaele Roma

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Patrizio Sale, MD, IRCCS San Raffale Pisana

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 30, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 30, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 31, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 8, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 17, 2012

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
August 20, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 10, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 9, 2024

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • RP 04/12

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

Clinical Trials on Robot-Assisted Gait Training (RAGT)

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings