Robot-assisted Walking Treatment in Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP)

April 30, 2025 updated by: IRCCS Eugenio Medea

Efficacy of Robot-assisted Walking Treatment on Gait Biomechanics, Functional Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Subjects With Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP)

Patients will undergo a combined rehabilitation treatment consisting of 15 sessions on Lokomat and 15 sessions of physical therapy over three weeks for a total of 30 sessions. Two sessions/day for 5 days a week. The same subjects will conduct clinical-functional assessments before, at the end of treatment, and after a 3-month follow-up:

3D Gait Analysis with defined protocol (BTSBioenginner); Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS); Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Ten Meters Walk Test (10MWT), Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS); Quality of life questionnaires: Medical Outcome Survey Short Form (SF-36) and ad hoc questionnaire for subjective assessment of symptoms during walking (HSP-SNAP).

This study is part of normal clinical practice and does not involve any changes to the current rehabilitation course for patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

In the field of rare neurological diseases, familiar spastic paraplegia represents a movement disorder with no specific therapy that can treat the disease or stop its evolution. Therefore, "therapy" is mainly symptomatic, going to act not on the cause of the disorder but on its clinical manifestation. In this context, the definition of effective rehabilitative treatment protocols is extremely important to ensure a qualitatively consistent intake with the goal of containing the functional decline related to the natural history of pathology. The crucial aspect of the disease is represented by alterations in gait pattern resulting in reduced functional skills and negative impact on the subject's quality of life.

Over the past 20 years, robotic technological gait rehabilitation has entered and spread in addition to conventional rehabilitation because of its ability to be highly motivating and engaging, showing itself effective as a complementary therapy. Among the various systems on the market, Lokomat (HOCOMA) is one of the most popular and widely used for treatment in both pediatric and adult populations. The literature is full with works in which Lokomat is used in subjects with neurological disorders (Stroke, Spinal Cord Injury, Infantile Cerebral Palsy) with good results especially in the functional domain. The objective of our study is to evaluate the efficacyof an intensive rehabilitation protocol with Lokomat combined with traditional treatment in a mixed population (pediatric and adult) of subjects with hereditary spastic paraplegia. In addition, follow-up evaluation will allow consideration of the maintenance of the results obtained from the intensive course.

Patients undergo a combined rehabilitation treatment consisting of 15 sessions on Lokomat and 15 sessions of physical therapy over three weeks for a total of 30 sessions. The same subjects undergo clinical-functional evaluations before, at the end of treatment and after a 3-month follow-up:

3D Gait Analysis with defined protocol (BTSBioenginner); Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS); Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), Ten Meters Walk Test (10MWT), Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS); Quality of life questionnaires: Medical Outcome Survey Short Form (SF-36) and ad hoc questionnaire for subjective assessment of symptoms during walking (HSP-SNAP).

The proposed study is both retrospective and prospective: 29 subjects have already been included in the retrospective database, and it is hypothesized to collect data from an additional 21 subjects.

The treatment will be able to take place in both inpatient and MAC settings, and the protocol includes performance evaluation through clinical and instrumental assessments in the population of subjects with HSP treated with the Lokomat device at the IRCCS Medea site in Bosisio Parini.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients affected by a hereditary spasti paraplegia with or without a genetic diagnosis.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • genetic or clinical diagnosis of HSP.
  • age greater than 4 years and less than 70
  • femur length > 23 cm
  • ability to walk independently indoors, with or without walking aids.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • botulinum toxin injection or lower limb surgery in the previous 6 months
  • severe lower limb muscle retractions
  • severe osteoporosis
  • unhealed skin lesions in lower limbs
  • cardiovascular instability
  • acute or progressive neurological disorders
  • behavioral problemS

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia (HSP)
Patients undergo a combined rehabilitation treatment consisting of 15 sessions on Lokomat and 15 sessions of physical therapy over three weeks for a total of 30 sessions. The same subjects undergo clinical-functional evaluations before, at the end of treatment and after a 3-month follow-up.
15 sessions of robot-assisted gait training(LOKOMAT)+ 15 session of usual treatment for a total of 30 sessions in three weeks. 45 minutes for each session.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: T0(pre-training)
Endurance Test
T0(pre-training)
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Endurance Test
T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Six-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: T2(3 months after T1)
Endurance Test
T2(3 months after T1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Medical Outcome Survey Short Form (SF-36)
Time Frame: T0(pre-training)
Questionnaire Quality of Life. 2 index: physical health and mental health. Higher score better health perception.
T0(pre-training)
Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia Self-Notion and Perception (HSP-SNAP)
Time Frame: T0(pre-training)
Questionnaire Self-Notion and Perception. Scoring: 0-48. Higher score better health.
T0(pre-training)
Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS)
Time Frame: T0(pre-training)
Severity of the HSP. Score: 0-52. Higher score more severity.
T0(pre-training)
Medical Outcome Survey Short Form (SF-36)
Time Frame: T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Questionnaire Quality of Life. 2 index: physical health and mental health. Higher score better health perception.
T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia Self-Notion and Perception (HSP-SNAP)
Time Frame: T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Questionnaire Self-Notion and Perception. Scoring: 0-48. Higher score better health.
T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS)
Time Frame: T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Severity of the HSP. Score: 0-52. Higher score more severity
T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Medical Outcome Survey Short Form (SF-36)
Time Frame: T2(3 months after T1)
Questionnaire Quality of Life. 2 index: physical health and mental health. Higher score better health perception.
T2(3 months after T1)
Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia Self-Notion and Perception (HSP-SNAP)
Time Frame: T2(3 months after T1)
Questionnaire Self-Notion and Perception. Scoring: 0-48. Higher score better health.
T2(3 months after T1)
Spastic Paraplegia Rating Scale (SPRS)
Time Frame: T2(3 months after T1)
Severity of the HSP. Score: 0-52. Higher score more severity
T2(3 months after T1)

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
3D GAIT ANALYSIS
Time Frame: T0(pre-training),T1(after 3 weeks of training),T2(3 months after T1)
Analysis of the gait pattern
T0(pre-training),T1(after 3 weeks of training),T2(3 months after T1)
Ten Meters Walk Test (10MWT)
Time Frame: T0(pre-training),T1(after 3 weeks of training),T2(3 months after T1)
Gait Velocity Test
T0(pre-training),T1(after 3 weeks of training),T2(3 months after T1)
3D GAIT ANALYSIS
Time Frame: T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Analysis of the gait pattern
T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Ten Meters Walk Test (10MWT)
Time Frame: T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Gait Velocity Test
T1(after 3 weeks of training)
3D GAIT ANALYSIS
Time Frame: T2(3 months after T1)
Analysis of the gait pattern
T2(3 months after T1)
Ten Meters Walk Test (10MWT)
Time Frame: T2(3 months after T1)
Gait Velocity Test
T2(3 months after T1)
Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: T0(pre-training),T1(after 3 weeks of training),T2(3 months after T1)
Pediatric Gross Motor Evaluation. Score:0-264. Higher score more function.
T0(pre-training),T1(after 3 weeks of training),T2(3 months after T1)
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: T0(pre-training),T1(after 3 weeks of training),T2(3 months after T1)
Balance Test. Score:0-56. Higher score better balance.
T0(pre-training),T1(after 3 weeks of training),T2(3 months after T1)
Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Pediatric Gross Motor Evaluation. Score:0-264. Higher score more function.
T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Balance Test. Score:0-56. Higher score better balance.
T1(after 3 weeks of training)
Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: T2(3 months after T1)
Pediatric Gross Motor Evaluation. Score:0-264. Higher score more function.
T2(3 months after T1)
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Time Frame: T2(3 months after T1)
Balance Test. Score:0-56. Higher score better balance.
T2(3 months after T1)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia

Clinical Trials on Robot-Assisted Gait Training

Subscribe