Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

May 23, 2025 updated by: Marian L Dale, MD, Oregon Health and Science University

Cerebellar Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Control in Progressive Supranuclear Palsy

The objective of this proposal is to investigate the effect of non-invasive repetitive cerebellar transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor control in progressive supranuclear (PSP). The central hypothesis is that augmenting cerebellar inhibition via cerebellar rTMS will decrease postural instability in patients with PSP. We will use functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to examine changes in motor and premotor cortical activity after cerebellar rTMS.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97239
        • Recruiting
        • Oregon Health & Science University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 81 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • probable or possible PSP by the revised MDS PSP Criteria (Hoglinger 2017)
  • age 40-85 at time of screening
  • ability to understand and cooperate with simple instructions in English
  • ability to read at 6th grade reading level in English
  • ability to stand unassisted for at least 30 seconds and to be able walk independently with a walker
  • ability to refrain from new physical and speech therapy programs for the duration of the study
  • ability to remain on stable doses of any cholinergic, dopaminergic, serotonergic sedative or NMDA receptor antagonists for the duration of the study
  • females of child-bearing age must perform a urine pregnancy test and be on reliable birth control during the course of the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other significant neurological or vestibular disorders
  • presence of electrically, magnetically or mechanically activated implants or history of injurious metal exposure in eyes, head, or body

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active TMS first
After completing their baseline assessment, participants randomized to this arm will initially take part in a 2-week TMS intervention. After the midpoint assessment and subsequent a 1-month washout, these participants will then complete a 2-week sham TMS period prior to their final assessment.

Aim 1: To determine the clinical effects of rTMS targeting the cerebellum on postural instability in PSP. The hypothesis to be tested is that TMS augmentation of cerebellar inhibition will improve cerebellum-dependent balance symptoms of PSP for a period of time sufficient to improve rehabilitation outcomes. The investigators will measure a battery of objective posturography metrics and other measures of motor control, including sway and center of pressure changes to backward tilt and forward translation.

Aim 2: We will use functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to examine changes in motor and premotor cortical activity after cerebellar rTMS. The hypothesis to be tested is that premotor and motor cortical activity will decrease after cerebellar rTMS compared to sham TMS, reflecting improved cerebellar inhibition of the motor cortex after the intervention.

Experimental: Sham treatment first
After completing their baseline assessment, participants randomized to this arm will initially take part in a 2-week sham TMS period. After the midpoint assessment and subsequent a 1-month washout, these participants will then complete a 2-week TMS intervention prior to their final assessment.

Aim 1: To determine the clinical effects of rTMS targeting the cerebellum on postural instability in PSP. The hypothesis to be tested is that TMS augmentation of cerebellar inhibition will improve cerebellum-dependent balance symptoms of PSP for a period of time sufficient to improve rehabilitation outcomes. The investigators will measure a battery of objective posturography metrics and other measures of motor control, including sway and center of pressure changes to backward tilt and forward translation.

Aim 2: We will use functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to examine changes in motor and premotor cortical activity after cerebellar rTMS. The hypothesis to be tested is that premotor and motor cortical activity will decrease after cerebellar rTMS compared to sham TMS, reflecting improved cerebellar inhibition of the motor cortex after the intervention.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
objective posturography
Time Frame: assessed on 4 days during the 8 week study period
The primary endpoint is center of pressure shifts with tilt and with translation, and body sway in quiet stance.
assessed on 4 days during the 8 week study period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
speech analysis
Time Frame: assessed on 4 days during the 8 week study period
speech sample assessment conducted by investigator
assessed on 4 days during the 8 week study period
fNIRS
Time Frame: assessed on 4 days during the 8 week study period
functional near infrared spectroscopy of premotor and motor areas during balance testing
assessed on 4 days during the 8 week study period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 6, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

April 20, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 7, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

July 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Supranuclear Palsy, Progressive

Clinical Trials on Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS)

Subscribe