Learning Theory to Improve Obesity Treatment (iROC)
Learning Theory to Improve Obesity Treatment (Intervention for Regulation of Cues)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
La Jolla, California, United States, 92037
- Center for Health Eating and Activity Research
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Response to an advertisement for the study,
- An overweight or obese child in the family who is between the ages of 8 and 13,
- The 8-13 year old child must be above the 85th BMI % for age and gender,
- Parent willing to participate and attend all meetings,
- Parent who can read at a minimum of a 5th grade level in English,
- Parent and child willing to commit to attendance and assessments,
- Child who eats in the absence of hunger.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Major child psychiatric disorder diagnoses,
- An obese child over the 99.9th BMI %
- Child or parent diagnoses of diabetes for which physician supervision of diet is needed or diagnosis of serious current physical diseases (such as cancer, multiple sclerosis, lupus) which could significantly decrease their ability to participate in the intervention (parent report),
- Child taking a medication that can affect cognitive functioning, such as attention, concentration, or mental status.
- Family with restrictions on types of food, such as food allergies, or religious or ethnic practices that limit the foods available in the home (these restrictions affect their ability participate in the food exposures because it would limit the variety of foods available to do exposures with),
- Child with an active eating disorder (based on parent and child self-report)
- Major parent psychiatric or eating disorder.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Single context
Subjects will be exposed to food cues in a single context.
|
Subjects will take random additional tastes of the food during cue exposure treatment.
Subjects will consistently take the same tastes of the food during cue exposure treatment.
|
|
Experimental: Multiple contexts
Subjects will be exposed to food cues in multiple contexts.
|
Subjects will take random additional tastes of the food during cue exposure treatment.
Subjects will consistently take the same tastes of the food during cue exposure treatment.
|
|
Active Comparator: 8 treatment sessions
Subjects receive 8 treatment sessions.
|
Subjects will be exposed to the same set of 4 foods in each cue exposure treatment session.
Subjects will be exposed to a different set of 4 foods in each cue exposure treatment session.
|
|
Experimental: 16 treatment sessions
Subjects receive 16 treatment sessions
|
Subjects will be exposed to the same set of 4 foods in each cue exposure treatment session.
Subjects will be exposed to a different set of 4 foods in each cue exposure treatment session.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in overeating (Eating in the absence of hunger) from baseline at an average of 3 months and 6 months
Time Frame: Change from baseline at an average of 3 months and 6 months
|
Reduce overeating or eating in the absence of hunger in response to food cues.
Habituation to food cues.
|
Change from baseline at an average of 3 months and 6 months
|
|
Change in child weight
Time Frame: Change from baseline at an average of 3 and 6 months
|
BMI, BMIz
|
Change from baseline at an average of 3 and 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in parent weight from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
Time Frame: Change from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
|
Measured by BMI (Body Mass Index)
|
Change from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
|
|
Change in attention to food cues from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
Time Frame: Change from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
|
Reduce attention to food cues, redirect attention to neutral (non-food cues).
Measured by computer program measuring response time
|
Change from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
|
|
Change in impulsivity/Inhibition from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
Time Frame: Change from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
|
Reduce impulsive behavior response to both food and non-food cues.
Measured by behavioral tasks
|
Change from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
|
|
Change in psychophysiological measures of responsivity to food cues from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
Time Frame: Change from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
|
Salivation/swallowing using EMG (electromyography), skin conductance, heart rate and heart rate variability.
|
Change from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
|
|
Change in level of self-reported cravings in response to palatable food cues from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
Time Frame: Change from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
|
Participants will rate their cravings on a scale of 1-10.
|
Change from baseline at average of 3 and 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Boutelle KN, Zucker NL, Peterson CB, Rydell SA, Cafri G, Harnack L. Two novel treatments to reduce overeating in overweight children: a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Dec;79(6):759-71. doi: 10.1037/a0025713.
- Epstein LH, Myers MD, Raynor HA, Saelens BE. Treatment of pediatric obesity. Pediatrics. 1998 Mar;101(3 Pt 2):554-70.
- Nederkoorn C, Smulders FT, Jansen A. Cephalic phase responses, craving and food intake in normal subjects. Appetite. 2000 Aug;35(1):45-55. doi: 10.1006/appe.2000.0328.
- Nederkoorn C, Jansen A. Cue reactivity and regulation of food intake. Eat Behav. 2002 Spring;3(1):61-72. doi: 10.1016/s1471-0153(01)00045-9.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
- treatment
- body mass index
- obesity
- overweight
- childhood obesity
- intervention
- cravings
- BMI
- weight
- behavioral treatment
- overweight children
- overeating
- family based treatment
- eating in the absence of hunger
- families with overweight child
- overweight parents
- cue exposure treatment
- habituation to food cues
- psychophysiological response to food cues
- experiments
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 120431
- 1R01DK094475-01A1 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.