A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Mirabegron + Solifenacin in Overactive Bladder Patients

January 31, 2018 updated by: Astellas Pharma Inc

Safety and Efficacy of Mirabegron as Add-on Therapy in Patients With Overactive Bladder Treated With Solifenacin: A Postmarketing Open-label Study in Japan

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of mirabegron as add-on therapy in patients with OAB treated with solifenacin.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The total duration of the study was 18 weeks, comprising a 2-week screening period and a 16-week treatment period. Patients meeting the eligibility criteria for provisional enrollment received the study drug for the screening period (solifenacin) at the same dose as that before the start of the study (2.5 or 5 mg), once daily after breakfast orally for 2 weeks. After the screening period, patients meeting the eligibility criteria for formal enrollment received the study drugs for the treatment period (solifenacin 2.5 or 5 mg and mirabegron 25 mg), once daily after breakfast orally for 16 weeks. Mirabegron dose could be increased to 50 mg at week 8 visit if the patients met all of the following criteria: (1) had an inadequate response to mirabegron at the dose of 25 mg; (2) was judged by the investigator or coinvestigator to have no safety concerns; and (3) agreed to increase the dose.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
223

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Japan
      • Chubu, Japan
      • Hokkaido, Japan
      • Kansai, Japan
      • Kantou, Japan
      • Kyushu, Japan

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female: postmenopausal OAB outpatient
  • Male: OAB outpatient who did not wish to have children at all
  • Patient had been treated with solifenacin at a stable dose once daily for at least 4 weeks prior to the study
  • Patient had a total OAB symptom score (OABSS ) score of ≥3 points and a Question 3 score ≥2 points

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient had a residual urine volume of ≥100 mL or a maximum flow rate <5 mL/s, or patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia, or lower urinary tract obstruction
  • Patient had serious heart disease (myocardial infarction, cardiac failure, uncontrolled angina pectoris, serious arrhythmia, use of pacemaker, etc.), liver disease, kidney disease, immunological disease, lung disease, etc. or patient had malignant tumor (except for malignant tumor that has not been treated for at least 5 y before the start of the screening period with no risk of recurrence)
  • Patient had received surgical therapy that may affect the urinary tract function within 24 weeks before the start of the screening period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Concomitant Group
concomitant administration of mirabegron to solifenacin treated patients
Drug: solifenacin
oral
Other Names:
  • Vesicare
  • YM905
Drug: mirabegron
oral
Other Names:
  • YM178
  • Betanis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From first dose of study drug up to weeks 16
TEAEs were defined as AEs observed after the first administration of the study drugs for the treatment period. The investigator assessed the severity of AEs, including abnormal clinical laboratory values, Electrocardiogram (ECG), vital signs, as follows: Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities; Moderate: Affected normal daily activities; Severe: Inability to perform daily activities. A drug-related TEAE was a TEAE with at least a possible relationship to the study drug as assessed by the investigator.
From first dose of study drug up to weeks 16

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in OABSS Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8, 16
The OABSS questionnaire was a questionnaire completed by participants with 4 questions regarding their OAB symptoms. For each participant, the OABSS total score was calculated from the sum total of the score of each question. The total score ranges from 0 to 15 with higher score indicating more symptoms. The OABSS data obtained at week 0 were used as baseline.
Baseline and week 8, 16
Number of Participants Who Achieved Normalization for OABSS Total Score
Time Frame: Week 8 and 16
Normalization for OABSS Total Score was defined as OABSS total score ≤ 2 or OABSS Question 3 score ≤ 1.
Week 8 and 16
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire Short Form (OAB-q SF) Severity Score
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8, 16
The OAB-q SF questionnaire was a questionnaire completed by participants composed of 2 sections: Severity Symptom and the Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL). The Severity Symptom section included 6 questions. For each participant, the symptom severity score was derived as a sum of scores for Questions 1 to 6. The total score ranges from 6 to 36 with higher symptom severity score indicating greater symptom bother. OAB-q SF data obtained at week 0 visit were used as baseline.
Baseline and week 8, 16
Change From Baseline in OAB-q SF Total HRQL Score
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8, 16
The OAB-q SF questionnaire was a questionnaire completed by participants composed of 2 sections: Severity Symptom and the HRQL. The HRQL section included 13 questions. For each participant, the total HRQL score was derived as a sum of scores for Questions 7 to 19. The total score ranges from 13 to 78 with higher total HRQL score indicating greater HRQL. OAB-q SF data obtained at week 0 visit were used as baseline.
Baseline and week 8, 16
Change From Baseline in the Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urinated" was indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded.
Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16
Number for Participants Who Achieved Normalization of the Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Week 16
Normalization for the mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was defined as < 8 micturitions per 24 hours.
Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. An urgency episode was defined as a complaint of a sudden, compelling desire to pass urine, which is difficult to defer. The mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urgency" was indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded. Only participants who had an urgency episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16
Number for Participants Who Achieved Normalization of the Number of Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Week 16
Normalization for the mean number of urgency episodes per 24 hours was defined as no urgency episode per 24 hours.
Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. An incontinence episode was defined as the complaint of any involuntary leakage of urine. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urinary incontinence'" was indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded. Only participants who had an incontinence episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16
Number for Participants Who Achieved Normalization of the Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Week 16
Normalization for the mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was defined as no incontinence episode per 24 hours.
Week 16
Change From Baseline in the Number of Urge Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. An urge incontinence episode was defined as any episode when both urgency and incontinence occurred concurrently. The mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours was calculated by taking the sum of all marked episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urgency" and "urinary incontinence'" were indicated, divided by the number of days on which episodes were recorded. Only participants who had an urge incontinence episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in the Volume Voided Per Micturition
Time Frame: Baseline and week 8, 16
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. The mean volume per micturition was calculated by taking the sum of the urinary volumes where the volume voided was > 0 and where "urinary incontinence" was not indicated in the patient diary, divided by the number of micturitions where the volume voided was > 0 and where "urinary incontinence" was not indicated. Only participants who had volume voided was > 0 at baseline was included in the analysis.
Baseline and week 8, 16
Change From Baseline in the Number of Nocturia Episodes Per Night
Time Frame: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16
Participants completed the patient diary (paper document) for 3 days immediately before each visit. A nocturia episode was defined as waking at night 1 or more times to void. Night time was defined as the period between bedtime and the wake-up time the following day (micturitions at the same time as the wake-up time were excluded). The mean number of nocturia episodes per night was calculated by taking the sum of nocturia episodes in the patient diary where the variable "urinated" was indicated during the night time, divided by the number of nights. Only participants who had a nocturia episode at baseline was included in the analysis.
Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16
Change From Baseline in Postvoid Residual (PVR) Volume
Time Frame: Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16
Measurement of PVR volume was made using either ultrasonography or urethral catheterization, provided that the same method was used for the same participant throughout the study.
Baseline and week 4, 8, 12, 16

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Astellas Pharma Inc

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 23, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 23, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 6, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 6, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 7, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 28, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 31, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 178-CL-110

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings