Laparoscopic Uterine Sparing Techniques Outcomes and Reinterventions (LUSTOR)
The LUSTOR (Laparoscopic Uterine Sparing Techniques Outcomes and Reinterventions)Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Tubingen, Germany, 72074
- Tubingen University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Are ≥ 18 years old and menstruating
- Have symptomatic uterine fibroids
- Have a uterine size ≤16 gestational weeks as determined by pelvic exam
- Have fibroids that are less than 10 cm in any diameter
- Desire uterine conservation
- Have had a normal Papanicolaou test (PAP smear) (i.e. PAP I or PAP II) at the latest pre-study examination and no longer than 36 months before study entry.
- Are willing and able to comply with all study tests, procedures, and assessment tools
- Are capable of providing informed consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Have contraindications for laparoscopic surgery and/or general anesthesia.
- Are expected to be high risk for, or are known to have, significant intra-abdominal adhesions (defined as adhesions that would require extensive dissection to mobilize and view all surfaces of the uterus)
- Patients requiring major elective concomitant procedures (e.g., hernia repair, hysteroscopic resection, endometrial ablation, uterine artery ligation, etc.) that could confound the results of the study
- Are pregnant or lactating
- Have taken any depot Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRh agonist within three months prior to the screening procedures
- Have an implanted intrauterine or fallopian tube device for contraception that cannot or will not be removed at least ten days prior to treatment
- Have chronic pelvic pain not due to uterine fibroids
- Have known or suspected endometriosis or adenomyosis
- Have active or history of pelvic inflammatory disease
- Have a history of, or evidence of, gynecologic malignancy or pre-malignancy within the past five years
- Have had pelvic radiation
- Have a non-uterine pelvic mass over 3 cm
- Have a cervical myoma
- Have one or more completely intracavitary submucous fibroids (Type 0) or only Type 0/1 submucous fibroids that are better treated via hysteroscopic methods
- In the medical judgment of the investigator should not participate in the study
- Are not willing to be randomized to treatment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Other: Global Fibroid Ablation
|
Other Names:
|
|
Other: Laparoscopic Myomectomy
Myomectomy via laparoscopy
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Compare the mean time of hospitalization following laparoscopic treatment of fibroids by myomectomy or GFA
Time Frame: From admission to the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 days
|
Capture and compare hospitalization time expressed as the number of hours from induction of anesthesia to discharge from hospital.
|
From admission to the duration of hospital stay, an expected average of 3 days
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Compare and contrast post-treatment readmission and reintervention rate
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post treatment
|
Compare incidence of post discharge readmission within 1 month of procedure and rate of reintervention for fibroid-related symptoms up to 60 months post procedure
|
Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post treatment
|
|
Compare and Contrast peri and post procedural safety including procedural blood loss and complications
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-treatment
|
Compare intraoperative blood loss and rate of procedural-related complications up to 60 months post treatment
|
Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-treatment
|
|
Compare and contrast recovery rate
Time Frame: Discharge from hospital up to an average of 5 weeks post treatment
|
Compare how many days it takes to return-to-work and to normal activities of daily living.
|
Discharge from hospital up to an average of 5 weeks post treatment
|
|
Compare and Contrast post-treatment changes in fibroid symptom severity.
Time Frame: Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-treatment
|
Compare Baseline fibroid related symptoms to 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post treatment
|
Baseline and 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-treatment
|
|
Compare and contrast post-treatment patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-treatment
|
Compare the overall subject treatment outcome and satisfaction evaluation
|
3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post-treatment
|
|
Compare and Contrast post-treatment changes in menstrual status.
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 ,12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post treatment
|
Compare Baseline menstrual impact to 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post treatment.
|
Baseline, 3, 6 ,12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post treatment
|
|
Compare and Contrast post-treatment changes concerning health-related quality-of-life.
Time Frame: Baseline, 3, 6 ,12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post treatment
|
Compare Baseline general health outcome to 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48 and 60 months post treatment.
|
Baseline, 3, 6 ,12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post treatment
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Sara Brucker, MD, University of Tubingen
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Bushnell DM, Martin ML, Moore KA, Richter HE, Rubin A, Patrick DL. Menorrhagia Impact Questionnaire: assessing the influence of heavy menstrual bleeding on quality of life. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Dec;26(12):2745-55. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.532200. Epub 2010 Nov 3.
- Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):290-300. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01702-1.
- Twijnstra AR, Kolkman W, Trimbos-Kemper GC, Jansen FW. Implementation of advanced laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: national overview of trends. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010 Jul-Aug;17(4):487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.03.010. Epub 2010 May 14.
- Viswanathan M, Hartmann K, McKoy N, Stuart G, Rankins N, Thieda P, Lux LJ, Lohr KN. Management of uterine fibroids: an update of the evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2007 Jul;(154):1-122.
- Holzer A, Jirecek ST, Illievich UM, Huber J, Wenzl RJ. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy: a double-blind study to evaluate postoperative pain. Anesth Analg. 2006 May;102(5):1480-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000204321.85599.0d.
- Parker WH, Iacampo K, Long T. Uterine rupture after laparoscopic removal of a pedunculated myoma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):362-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2006.10.024.
- Banas T, Klimek M, Fugiel A, Skotniczny K. Spontaneous uterine rupture at 35 weeks' gestation, 3 years after laparoscopic myomectomy, without signs of fetal distress. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2005 Dec;31(6):527-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1447-0756.2005.00331.x.
- Mara M, Maskova J, Fucikova Z, Kuzel D, Belsan T, Sosna O. Midterm clinical and first reproductive results of a randomized controlled trial comparing uterine fibroid embolization and myomectomy. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2008 Jan-Feb;31(1):73-85. doi: 10.1007/s00270-007-9195-2. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
- Manyonda IT, Bratby M, Horst JS, Banu N, Gorti M, Belli AM. Uterine artery embolization versus myomectomy: impact on quality of life--results of the FUME (Fibroids of the Uterus: Myomectomy versus Embolization) Trial. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2012 Jun;35(3):530-6. doi: 10.1007/s00270-011-0228-5. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
- Munro MG, Critchley HO, Broder MS, Fraser IS; FIGO Working Group on Menstrual Disorders. FIGO classification system (PALM-COEIN) for causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in nongravid women of reproductive age. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011 Apr;113(1):3-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.11.011. Epub 2011 Feb 22.
- Hartung J, Knapp G. On tests of the overall treatment effect in meta-analysis with normally distributed responses. Stat Med. 2001 Jun 30;20(12):1771-82. doi: 10.1002/sim.791.
- Levine DJ, Harris M, Berman JM, Macer J, Abbott K, Lee BB. Leiomyoma assessment by intra-abdominal ultrasound compared to preoperative ultrasound and preoperative magnetic imaging. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011;18(suppl):S1.
- Moss JG, Cooper KG, Khaund A, Murray LS, Murray GD, Wu O, Craig LE, Lumsden MA. Randomised comparison of uterine artery embolisation (UAE) with surgical treatment in patients with symptomatic uterine fibroids (REST trial): 5-year results. BJOG. 2011 Jul;118(8):936-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2011.02952.x. Epub 2011 Apr 12.
- U.S. Valuation of the EuroQoL EQ-5D Health States. December 2005. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.ahrq.gove/rice/EQ5Dproj.htm
- Chudnoff SG, Berman JM, Levine DJ, Harris M, Guido RS, Banks E. Outpatient procedure for the treatment and relief of symptomatic uterine myomas. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 May;121(5):1075-1082. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31828b7962.
- Robles R, Aguirre VA, Argueta AI, Guerrero MR. Laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of uterine myomas with 12 months of follow-up. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2013 Jan;120(1):65-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2012.07.023. Epub 2012 Oct 14.
- Garza Leal JG, Hernandez Leon I, Castillo Saenz L, Lee BB. Laparoscopic ultrasound-guided radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: feasibility study using the Halt 2000 Ablation System. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2011 May-Jun;18(3):364-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2011.02.006.
- Guido RS, Macer JA, Abbott K, Falls JL, Tilley IB, Chudnoff SG. Radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of fibroids: a prospective, clinical analysis of two years' outcome from the Halt trial. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013 Aug 13;11:139. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-139.
- Brucker SY, Hahn M, Kraemer D, Taran FA, Isaacson KB, Kramer B. Laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of fibroids versus laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014 Jun;125(3):261-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2013.11.012. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
- Hahn M, Brucker S, Kraemer D, Wallwiener M, Taran FA, Wallwiener CW, Kramer B. Radiofrequency Volumetric Thermal Ablation of Fibroids and Laparoscopic Myomectomy: Long-Term Follow-up From a Randomized Trial. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2015 May;75(5):442-449. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1545931.
- Kramer B, Hahn M, Taran FA, Kraemer D, Isaacson KB, Brucker SY. Interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing laparoscopic radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of uterine fibroids with laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 May;133(2):206-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.008. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
- Walter CB, Hartkopf AD, Schoeller D, Kraemer B, Neis F, Taran FA, Isaacson KB, Brucker SY, Hahn M. Ultrasound guided core needle biopsy prior to thermo ablative treatment of uterine tumors: first results. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2018 Feb;297(2):387-392. doi: 10.1007/s00404-017-4590-7. Epub 2017 Nov 24.
- Berman JM, Guido RS, Garza Leal JG, Pemueller RR, Whaley FS, Chudnoff SG; Halt Study Group. Three-year outcome of the Halt trial: a prospective analysis of radiofrequency volumetric thermal ablation of myomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014 Sep-Oct;21(5):767-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.02.015. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- CP-00-0018
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.