rTMS in the Treatment of PTSD

March 21, 2021 updated by: Peter Y Chan, University of British Columbia

The Role of Fast or Slow Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation as Adjunct Therapy in Civilian Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder

The purpose of this study is to assess the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in civilian patients with a confirmed diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This research study will determine whether low-frequency (1 Hertz [Hz]) or high-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) has an effect on symptoms of PTSD compared to sham rTMS treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
31

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Canada
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • Vancouver General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary diagnosis of PTSD as determined by a structured interview using the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI)
  • no change in psychotropic medications within 4 weeks before the start of rTMS
  • age > 19 years and < 70 years
  • competency to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • any non-fixed metal object or implant (including cochlear implants) in brain, skull, scalp, or neck within 30 cm of the magnetic rTMS coil
  • implantable devices, including cardiac pacemakers and defibrillators
  • other contraindications to rTMS, including history of seizures (except childhood febrile seizures) or recent and unexplained syncope, first-degree relative with a history of epilepsy, treatment with a medication known to substantially decrease the seizure threshold, or pregnancy
  • psychiatric diagnoses of psychosis or psychotic disorder (including psychotic depression), bipolar type I disorder, or organic mental disorders
  • substance abuse/dependence within the past 3 months
  • active suicidal risk as judged by the clinician
  • borderline or antisocial personality disorder
  • acute medical illness, including cancer
  • any significant central nervous system disorder, such as brain mass, stroke, etc.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Low-frequency (1 Hz) rTMS
Low-frequency active stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on 5 consecutive days every week for 2 weeks, for a total of 10 therapy sessions, with 37.5 minutes per session.
Device: rTMS
Magstim Super Rapid-2
Other Names:
  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Active Comparator: High-frequency (10 Hz) rTMS
High-frequency active stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on 5 consecutive days every week for 2 weeks, for a total of 10 therapy sessions, with 37.5 minutes per session.
Device: rTMS
Magstim Super Rapid-2
Other Names:
  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation
Placebo Comparator: Sham rTMS
Sham stimulation over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on 5 consecutive days every week for 2 weeks, for a total of 10 therapy sessions, with 37.5 minutes per session.
Device: rTMS
Magstim Super Rapid-2
Other Names:
  • repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-IV (CAPS-IV)
Time Frame: Endpoint (treatment end) (Week 2).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale-IV (CAPS-IV) is a semi-structured instrument that assesses the intensity, frequency, and severity of PTSD symptoms. It consists of 17 symptom items, each rated on a 0-4 scale for frequency and a 0-4 scale for intensity, with higher scores indicating greater frequency/intensity. The frequency and intensity scores are then summed to yield a total item severity score (range 0-8). The minimum score of the overall scale is 0 and maximum is 17 items * maximum severity score of 8 = 136 (higher scores indicating more severe symptoms).
Endpoint (treatment end) (Week 2).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
PTSD Checklist for Civilians (PCL-C)
Time Frame: Endpoint (Week 2).
The PTSD Checklist for Civilians (PCL-C) is a standardised self-report rating scale for PTSD comprising 17 items that correspond to the DSM-V symptoms of PTSD. A total symptom severity score (range = 17-85) can be obtained by summing the scores from each of the 17 items that have response options ranging from 1 "Not at all" to 5 "Extremely".
Endpoint (Week 2).
Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, 21-item Version (HDRS-21)
Time Frame: Endpoint (Week 2)
A clinician-rated assessment of depression symptoms consisting of 21 items rated on a scale from 0 to 4, 0 to 2, or 0 to 3, with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity in all cases. Minimum score = 0; maximum score = 53 (scores > 23 are considered to be severe).
Endpoint (Week 2)
Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology - Self-Report (QIDS-SR)
Time Frame: Endpoint (Week 2)
A self-report scale to assess symptoms of depression consisting of 16 items, 9 of which contribute to a summed total score (i.e., only the highest score of items 1-4, 6-9, and 15-16 are counted). Scores range from 0-3, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Total scores range from 0-27, with scores >= 21 considered very severe, 20-16 severe, 11-15 moderate, and 6-10 mild depression.
Endpoint (Week 2)
Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
Time Frame: Endpoint (Week 2)
A self-report scale to assess symptoms of anxiety, consisting of 21 items scored on a scale from 0-3, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Total scores range from 0-63, with scores >= indicating potentially concerning levels of anxiety.
Endpoint (Week 2)
Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7) Scale
Time Frame: Endpoint (Week 2)
A brief self-report scale to assess symptoms of anxiety, consisting of 7 items each scored on a scale from 0-3, with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms. Total scores range from 0-21, with scores 0-4 suggesting minimal anxiety, 5-9 mild, 10-14 moderate, and 15-21 severe anxiety.
Endpoint (Week 2)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of British Columbia

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Vancouver Coastal Health

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Larry Ong, MD, FRCPC, Vancouver Coastal Health

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
October 1, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 4, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 5, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 7, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 21, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H12-01578
  • V12-01578 (Other Identifier: Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings