Single Centre Blinded Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Two Pelvic Support Garments (MAPS)

December 23, 2015 updated by: Jenny Freeman, University of Plymouth

Management of Antenatal Pelvic Girdle Pain Study (MAPS): a Single Centre Blinded Randomized Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness of Two Pelvic Support Garments

This blinded randomized comparative trial aims to determine the effectiveness of a customized Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses (DEFO) compared to a standard pelvic belt in: a) reducing pregnancy-related pelvic girdle pain (PGP), b) optimizing activity levels in pregnant women with PGP, c) improving quality of life for pregnant women with PGP d) cost effectiveness.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Pelvic girdle pain (PGP) occurs in an estimated 70% of pregnant women, of whom 25% have severe pain and 8% significant disability. Current methods of management, such as the use of rigid pelvic belts, are limited in their effectiveness. The Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses (DEFO) has recently proven beneficial in managing PGP in athletes. There is a need to explore the potential use of DEFO for managing PGP during pregnancy. The primary aim of the study is to compare the effectiveness of a DEFO to a rigid 'off the shelf' pelvic support belt in terms of its effectiveness in reducing PGP during pregnancy. The secondary aims of the study are to compare the effectiveness of the DEFO to the rigid 'off the shelf' pelvic support belt in (a) optimizing activity levels in pregnant women with PGP, (b)improving quality of life for pregnant women with PGP. The relative cost effectiveness of these two interventions will also be compared.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
72

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United Kingdom
    • Cornwall
      • Truro, Cornwall, United Kingdom, TR1 3LJ
        • Royal Cornwall Hospital
    • Devon
      • Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom, PL6 8BH
        • University of Plymouth

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

women 20-36 weeks pregnant, who:

  • report intermittent PGP (commenced or aggravated during pregnancy) which causes walking and/or stair climbing to be bothersome and
  • are positive on at least 3 out of 7 pain provocation tests

Exclusion Criteria:

  • recent history/signs or symptoms indicative of serious causes of pain that might be inflammatory, infective, traumatic, neoplastic, degenerative or metabolic, i.e. trauma, unexplained weight loss, history of cancer, steroid use, drug abuse, HIV infection, immunosuppressed state, neurological symptoms/signs such as: bowel, bladder, sensory, motor, reflex involvement (cauda equina, lumbar disk lesion, spinal stenosis,)
  • fever
  • systemically unwell
  • obstetric complications
  • pain that does not improve with rest/severe disabling pain
  • history of chronic back or pelvic pain requiring surgery
  • focal inflammatory signs/tenderness of spine (spondylolisthesis)
  • known skin allergy to lycra
  • >36 weeks pregnant (production of customized DEFO will take approximately 1 week)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Customised Orthoses
Customised Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses (DEFO)
Device: Customised Dynamic Elastomeric fabric Orthoses
Eligible participants will be measured and fitted with a customised Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses. The participant may require a re-fitting of the garment as they progress through their pregnancy. Participants will also be issued with standardised advice on PGP management via an information leaflet from Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Women's health website.
Other Names:
  • Pelvic Support Garment
  • Customised Dynamic Elastomeric Fabric Orthoses (DEFO)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Rigid 'off the shelf' pelvic support
Serola Sacroiliac Belt.
Device: Serola Sacroiliac Belt
Eligible participants will be measured and fitted with a Serola sacroiliac belt. Participants will also be issued with standardised advice on PGP management via an information leaflet from Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Women's health website.
Other Names:
  • Rigid 'off the shelf' Pelvic Support Belt
  • Pelvic Support garment

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain Levels
Time Frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weekly intervals for potential of 20 weeks(pre-partum), 2 weekly intervals for 6 weeks (post-partum)
Change in pain levels at 2 weekly intervals will be measured by a self report numerical rating scale.
Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weekly intervals for potential of 20 weeks(pre-partum), 2 weekly intervals for 6 weeks (post-partum)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Activity Levels
Time Frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weekly intervals for potential of 20 weeks(pre-partum), 2 weekly intervals for 6 weeks (post-partum)
Change in activity levels at 2 weekly intervals will be measured by a self report questionnaire.
Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weekly intervals for potential of 20 weeks(pre-partum), 2 weekly intervals for 6 weeks (post-partum)
Change in Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weekly intervals for potential of 20 weeks(pre-partum), 2 weekly intervals for 6 weeks (post-partum)

Change in Quality of life at two weekly intervals will be measured by two self report questionnaires:

(i) Short Form 36 - Item Health Survey (Version 2) (ii) Euroqol (EQ-5D) Health Questionnaire
Baseline (pre intervention), 2 weekly intervals for potential of 20 weeks(pre-partum), 2 weekly intervals for 6 weeks (post-partum)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
University of Plymouth

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lee Cameron, University of Plymouth

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
November 1, 2012

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 15, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 22, 2013

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
March 28, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
December 24, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 23, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
December 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PGP-LC12

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings