Clinical Evaluation of Systane® ULTRA Compared to OPTIVE® in Ocular Surface Staining
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Willing and able to attend all study visits.
- Diagnosis of dry eye, as specified in protocol.
- Uses artificial tears, as specified in protocol.
- Other protocol-defined inclusion criteria may apply.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Poor visual acuity, as specified in protocol.
- Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, lactating, or not using adequate birth control, as specified in protocol.
- Any hypersensitivity or allergy to the investigational products or ingredients.
- Any eye disorder, ocular surgery, medication, medical condition, or systemic disease, as specified in protocol.
- Contact lens use within 2 weeks of Screening Visit.
- Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Systane Ultra
Systane® ULTRA lubricant eyedrops, 1 drop in each eye 4 times a day for 35 days (Phase I), followed by 55 days additional use as needed (Phase II).
|
1 drop in each eye, 4 times a day, for up to two weeks as washout prior to Phase I and Phase II.
|
|
Active Comparator: Optive
OPTIVE® lubricating eyedrops, 1 drop in each eye 4 times a day for 35 days (Phase I), followed by 55 days additional use as needed (Phase II).
|
1 drop in each eye, 4 times a day, for up to two weeks as washout prior to Phase I and Phase II.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Ocular Surface Staining (TOSS) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 35
|
The TOSS score is a composite score of corneal fluorescein staining, nasal conjunctival lissamine green staining, and temporal conjunctival lissamine green staining, each scored on a 0-5 Likert scale (0=absent, 5=severe).
TOSS scores can range from 0 to 15.
One eye (study eye) contributed to the analysis.
|
Baseline, Day 35
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Mean Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Score at Day 35 (Phase I)
Time Frame: Day 35
|
The OSDI is a 12-item, quality of life questionnaire that evaluates symptoms based on 3 modules (type of discomfort, environmental triggers, and tasking) on a 0-4 Likert scale (0=None of the time, 4=All of the time).
A resultant overall 0-100 score was calculated, where 0=No disability and 100=Complete disability.
Both eyes contributed to the analysis.
|
Day 35
|
|
Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Effectiveness Score at Day 35 (Phase I)
Time Frame: Day 35
|
The IDEEL is a 10-item, patient-reported questionnaire used to measure treatment satisfaction.
The subject answered 4 questions pertaining to treatment effectiveness scored on a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=None of the time, 1=A little of the time, 2=Some of the time, 3=Most of the time, and 4=All of the time.
The IDEEL score for treatment effectiveness was calculated based upon the mean value of the 4 questions multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100, where 0=Complete disability and 100=No disability.
Both eyes contributed to the analysis.
|
Day 35
|
|
Mean Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life (IDEEL) Treatment Inconvenience Score at Day 35 (Phase I)
Time Frame: Day 35
|
The IDEEL is a 10-item, patient-reported questionnaire used to measure treatment satisfaction.
The subject answered 4 questions pertaining to treatment inconvenience scored on a 0-4 Likert-type scale, where 0=All of the time, 1=Most of the time, 2=Some of the time, 3=A little of the time, and 4=None of the time.
The IDEEL score for treatment inconvenience was calculated based upon the mean value of the 4 questions multiplied by 25, for a resultant overall score of 0-100, where 0=Complete disability and 100=No disability.
Both eyes contributed to the analysis.
|
Day 35
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Steve Burmaster, Alcon Research
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- M-12-040
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.