Communicating Evidence From Systematic Reviews to the Public (PLSRCT)
Communicating Evidence From Systematic Reviews to the Public: A Randomised Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Argentine Cochrane Centre, Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria (IECS)
-
-
-
-
Ontario
-
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- University of Ottawa
-
-
-
-
-
Milan, Italy
- University of Milan
-
-
-
-
-
Oslo, Norway
- Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain
- Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano - Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients or members of the public 16 years or older
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Quadruple
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: New plain language summary format
New plain language summary format of a Cochrane systematic review
|
New plain language summary includes qualitative and quantitative description of text (absolute effects and natural frequencies provided); quantitative results provided in a table; quality of the evidence according to GRADE provided in a table; question and answer format; follows principles of linguistic frameworks (e.g.
progressive movements from introduction to 'bottom line')
|
|
Active Comparator: Current plain language summary format
Plain Language Summary format for the public currently in use in Cochrane systematic reviews
|
Current plain language summary includes qualitative description of effects only; inconsistent description of the quality of the evidence; paragraph of text; inconsistent flow of information
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Understanding of benefits and harms
Time Frame: After reading summary - time 0
|
Average proportion of people who answered 5 multiple choice questions correctly.
Each question includes five response options about the number of people who could benefit or be harmed by the intervention and about the quality of evidence
|
After reading summary - time 0
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of questions answered correctly
Time Frame: After reading summary - time 0
|
Total number of questions out of five questions for benefits and harms that were answered correctly
|
After reading summary - time 0
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Understanding of the purpose of the summary
Time Frame: after reading summary - time 0
|
A multiple choice question with three options
|
after reading summary - time 0
|
|
Understanding the producer of the summary
Time Frame: after reading summary - time 0
|
A multiple choice question with three options
|
after reading summary - time 0
|
|
Usability and accessibility
Time Frame: after reading summary - time 0
|
Five questions about whether information was easy to find and understand, reliable, and useful to someone making a decision.
Measured using a 7 point Likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree).
|
after reading summary - time 0
|
|
Preference for the new format or the old format
Time Frame: after reading both summaries - time 0
|
7 point likert scale
|
after reading both summaries - time 0
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Claire Glenton, PhD, Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services
- Principal Investigator: Holger J Schunemann, MD PhD, McMaster University
- Principal Investigator: Nancy A Santesso, RD PhD cand, McMaster University
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- PLSRCT1
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.