High Dose Vitamin D vs Standard Dose Vitamin D Study

August 5, 2021 updated by: Mothaffar Rimawi

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of High Dose vs. Standard Dose Vitamin D for Aromatase-Inhibitor Induced Arthralgia in Breast Cancer Survivors

This study is being done to look at the difference, if there is a difference between two different doses of Vitamin D and the reduction of joint/muscle pain (arthralgia)that is caused by taking anti-estrogen medications (aromatase inhibitors) by breast cancer patients. The investigators hope to learn if taking a higher dose of Vitamin D is a good way to prevent aromatase inhibitor arthralgia (AIA).

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Terminated

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Treatments with anti-estrogen agents for hormone receptor positive breast cancer is the most efficacious of systemic therapies, with aromatase inhibitors (AI's) being considered the most active anti-estrogen therapy in early stage breast cancer. But, use of these treatments has been shown to cause musculoskeletal (joint/muscle) side effects that sometimes cause patients to discontinue the use of them. Also, Vitamin D deficiency is a well know cause of a wide array of musculoskeletal issues. There is evidence that Vitamin D supplementation may help prevent arthralgia while on AI's. Therefore, the investigators want to see if giving a higher dose of Vitamin D could decrease the incidence of AIA as compared to a standard dose of Vitamin D. The investigators believe that this could possibly result in patients continued treatment with AI therapy for hormone receptor positive breast cancer.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
93

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Missouri
      • Saint Louis, Missouri, United States, 63110
        • Washington University / Siteman Cancer Center
    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All participants must be female and at least 21 years of age
  • Signed informed consent
  • Patients must have had histologically confirmed stage I-III breast carcinoma that is positive for Estrogen Receptor (ER) and/or Progesterone Receptor (PR).
  • Post-menopausal
  • Beginning adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy, with no previous use within the last 6 weeks
  • Bisphosphonates are allowed at the treating investigator¡¦s discretion
  • Performance status (WHO/ECOG scale) 0-2.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of kidney stones
  • Hypercalcemia at baseline, defined as any corrected calcium greater than the laboratory's normal parameters
  • History of either symptomatic hypercalcemia or hyperparathyroidism, at the treating investigator's discretion
  • Baseline Vitamin D level greater than 50 ng/mL
  • Inability or unwillingness to comply with, or follow study procedures.
  • Currently taking Phenytoin or phenobarbital -7 Currently taking cholestyramine or orlistat
  • Malabsorption syndrome, such as Crohn's disease

Prohibited Therapies: Patients may not take additional Calcium and Vitamin D aside from the study medications. Patients who are on cholestyramine or orlistat will not be allowed on the trial. Also, patients who are taking phenytoin or phenobarbital are not allowed on the trial either because of interaction between Vitamin D and anti-epileptic medications.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: High Dose Vitamin D ARM
50,000 IU Vitamin D supplement
Drug: 50,000 IU Vitamin D supplement
High Dose
Active Comparator: 800 IU Vitamin D Supplement
Drug: 800 IU Vitamin D Supplement
Standard Dose

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Aromatase Inhibitor Induced Arthralgia (AIA) After 12 Weeks of Therapy
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Aromatase Inhibitor Arthralgia (AIA) was assessed by a questionnaire that describe the level of pain experienced by the participant. The questionnaire asks 20 questions scored 0-3 in 8 categories of functioning: dressing, rising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and usual activities. An average composite score on the HAQ-II was calculated. The visual analog scale is the other major component of the HAQ-II, which we ask patients to mark where their pain lies on a horizontal line and we converts the number into a score from 0 to 3. For the purposes of this study, AIA will be defined as any of the following criteria: 1) increase in HAQ-II score from baseline by 0.2 or greater; or 2) increase in visual analog pain score by 0.3 or greater.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Compliance With Anti-Cancer Treatment
Time Frame: 52 Weeks
We checked compliance of aromatase inhibitor therapy during the study by reviewing the patient's use of AI drug. This will be done by counting remaining pills in patient's bottles of AI at 52 weeks. A percentage of the number of pills were actually taken of the number of pills should be taken was calculated.
52 Weeks
Association Between Vitamin D Levels Changes and Treatment.
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Patients' serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level were tested at baseline and week 12. The changes between baseline and week 12 were calculated.
12 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Grip Strength
Time Frame: 52 weeks
Exploratory Endpoints For each patient on the study, grip strength will be correlated with AIA score using Spearman correlation at three time points throughout the study - baseline, week 12, and week 52.
52 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mothaffar Rimawi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 21, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 7, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 13, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 20, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 5, 2021

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H-33261

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings