Aerobic Training in Patients With Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type III

October 28, 2015 updated by: Karen Lindhardt Madsen, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Aerobic Training Improves Oxidative Capacity, But Not Function in Spinal Muscular Atrophy III

Spinal muscular atrophy type III, (SMAIII) is a disease in the nerve cells in the spinal cord which leads to to progressive muscle weakness and atrophy. No effective treatment is available for SMA. We have previously shown that patients with muscular dystrophies improve oxidative capacity (VO2max), muscle strength and daily function by aerobic conditioning. Patients with SMAIII share many clinical features with these conditions, although the mechanism of muscle weakness is different. In this study, we investigated how patients with SMAIII respond to aerobic training.

6 patients and 9 healthy age- and sex-matched controls completed a 12 weeks training program. Subjects performed a total of 42 training session of 30 min on a stationary cycle ergometer at home. The work intensity was moderate and set to match a target heart rate.

Training induced an increase without inducing muscle damage. However, training-induced fatigue was a major complaint in all patients, and caused one patient to drop out, increased the need for sleep in three patients and two had to modify the training program.

The fatigue limits the use of this therapy. The training-induced fatigue, which is not encountered in muscle diseases, warrants investigations into alternative training methods to improve quality of life in patients with SMAIII.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Spinal muscular atrophy type III, (SMAIII) is a recessively inherited disease in the lower motor neuron in the anterior horn of spinal cord leading to to progressive muscle weakness and atrophy. Currently there is no effective treatment available for SMA. We have previously shown that patients with muscular dystrophies improve oxidative capacity (VO2max), muscle strength and daily function by aerobic conditioning. Patients with SMAIII share many clinical features with these conditions, although the mechanism of muscle weakness is different. In this study, we investigated how patients with SMAIII respond to aerobic training.

6 patients and 9 healthy age- and sex-matched controls completed a 12 weeks training program. Subjects performed a total of 42 training session of 30 min on a stationary cycle ergometer at home. The work intensity was moderate and set to match a target heart rate.

VO2max was measured during a incremental exercise test using indirect calorimetry before and after the training period. Functional tests adressing patients walking and stair climbing abilities, were performed before and after the training period. Changes in activities of daily living was adressed in a standardized questionnaire after the training period.

Training induced an increase without inducing muscle damage. There were no changes in patients' functional capacities. However, training-induced fatigue was a major complaint in all patients, and caused one patient to drop out, increased the need for sleep in three patients and two had to modify the training program.

The fatigue limits the use of this therapy. The training-induced fatigue, which is not encountered in muscle diseases, warrants investigations into alternative training methods to improve quality of life in patients with SMAIII.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
15

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Denmark
      • Copenhagen E, Denmark, 2100
        • Rigshospitalet, Neuromuscular Research Unit, 3342

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Genetically verified SMAIII

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other serious medical conditions that could confound the interpretation of results and
  • regular exercise more than one hour weekly

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: 12 weeks of aerobic conditioning
12 weeks of aerobic conditioning, a total 42 sessions of 30min exercise on a stationary cycle ergometer
Behavioral: Aerobic conditioning
Subjects performed 12 weeks of aerobic training on a stationary cycle ergometer. Subjects compleeted a total of 42 training sessions of 30min. exercise at an individually adjusted moderate workload.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in oxidative capacity with aerobic conditioning in SMAIII patients
Time Frame: After 12 weeks of aerobic training
After 12 weeks of aerobic training

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in maximal workload capacity with aerobic conditioning in SMAIII patients
Time Frame: After 12 weeks of aerobic conditioning
The maximal workload capacity was defined as: The maximal resistance the subject was able to work at, during an incremental load exercise test, performed on a cycle ergometer.
After 12 weeks of aerobic conditioning
Changes in isometric muscle strength with aerobic conditioning in SMAIII patients
Time Frame: After 12 weeks of aerobic conditioning
Isometric muscle strength was measured using a hand held dynamometer testing the strengths in the gastrocnemius and the quadriceps muscles of the legs. Strengths in the biceps and deltoid muscles were used as controls.
After 12 weeks of aerobic conditioning
Changes in daily function with aerobic conditioning in SMAIII patients
Time Frame: After 12 weeks of aerobic training
Changes in daily function was measured as changes in activities af daily living (ADL) reported in a ADL-questionnaire
After 12 weeks of aerobic training

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Karen L Madsen, M.Sc, Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
August 22, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 2, 2013

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 6, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 29, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 28, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • H-KF297836

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Clinical Trials on Aerobic conditioning

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings