Assessing Tumor Response and IMRT Treat Plan After IC Based on FDG-PET/CT for Locally Advanced HNSCC

March 1, 2016 updated by: Ilona Kulakiene, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

Assessing Tumor Response and IMRT Treatment Planning After Induction Chemotherapy Based on FDG-PET/CT for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of cisplatin plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) based on FDG-PET/CT after induction chemotherapy (IC) for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Current guidelines define that pre-IC target volumes must be used for radiotherapy (RT) planning. This prospective, phase II trial assessed the results of patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck treatment with IC following by chemoradiotherapy (CRT), using post-IC PET/CT images for IMRT planning.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
40

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Lithuania
      • Kaunas, Lithuania, LT-44307
        • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients aged 18 years or over;
  • Histologically confirmed locally advanced (stage III and IV) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC);
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0 or 1;
  • Signed written informed consent approved by the Lithuanian Bioethics Committee (LBEC);

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Positive serum pregnancy test in women of childbearing potential or breastfeeding;
  • Presence of distant metastasis;
  • Second primary tumor;
  • History of other malignancy within the last 5 years;
  • Recurrent head and neck cancer;
  • Serious uncontrolled concomitant disease that would contraindicate the use of any drugs use in this study as chemotherapy or radiotherapy; ;

  • Inadequate organ function, evidenced by the following laboratory results:

    1. Absolute neutrophil count <1,500 cells/mm3;
    2. Platelet count <100,000 cells/mm3;
    3. Hemoglobin <9 g/dL;
    4. Total bilirubin greater than the upper limit of normal (ULN);
    5. AST (SGOT) or ALT (SGPT) >1,5 x ULN;
    6. Alkaline phosphatase levels >2,5 x the ULN;
    7. Serum creatinine >2,0 mg/dl or 177 umol/l.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Experimental
Induction chemotherapy (Docetaxel, Cisplatin and Fluorouracil) following radiochemotherapy (IMRT using PET/CT images after IC for treatment planning + cisplatin iv 40 mg/m2 weekly).
Radiation: IMRT
IMRT treatment planning using FDG-PET/CT images after induction chemotherapy (IC).
Other Names:
  • intensity-modulated radiation therapy
Radiation: PET/CT
Assessing tumor response using FDG-PET/CT.
Other Names:
  • Positron emission tomography-computed tomography
Drug: Docetaxel
75 mg/m2, IV (in the vein) on day 1 every 3 weeks. Number of cycles: 3.
Other Names:
  • Taxotere, Docefrez
Drug: Fluorouracil
750 mg/m2 continuous infusion for 120 h IV (in the vein) every 3 weeks. Number of cycles: 3.
Other Names:
  • 5-Fluorouracil, Adrucil
Drug: Cisplatin
75 mg/m2, IV (in the vein) on day 1 every 3 weeks. Number of cycles: 3.
Other Names:
  • Platinol

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression free survival (PFS)
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment
PFS was defined as the time from the first day of IC first cycles to either progression or death.
24 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Tumour metabolic response (MTV) reduction (%)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after IC
MTV was defined as the tumor volume with FDG uptake segmented by a gradient-based method and fixed threshold methods at >40% of SUVmax. The MTV predictive value for tumor response to IC was assessed by comparing MTV's reduction (MTV of second PET/CT difference from MTV of first PET/CT in percent) in IC responders versus non responders and correlation with PFS and OS.
2 weeks after IC
Total lesion glycolysis (TLG) reduction (%)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after IC
The TLG was defined as (MTV) x (SUVmean). The TLG predictive value for tumor response to IC was assessed by comparing TLG reduction (TLG of second PET/CT difference from TLG of first PET/CT in percent) in IC responders versus non responders and correlation with PFS and OS.
2 weeks after IC
SUVmax reductions (%)
Time Frame: 2 weeks after IC
The SUVmax was defined as (tissue activity) (mcCi/ml)/(injected dose) (mCI)/(patient weight) (kg) within the voxel having the highest activity within a given region of interest (ROI). The SUVmax predictive value for tumor response to IC was assessed by comparing reductions in SUVmax (SUVmax of second PET/CT difference from SUVmax of first PET/CT in percent) in IC responders versus non responders and correlation with PFS and OS.
2 weeks after IC
Number (%) of participants with adverse events
Time Frame: 12 and 24 months from chemoradiotherapy
Treatment acute toxicity during IC and CRT (chemoradiotherapy) was weekly assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTCAE) v.4.0. Late adverse events related with radiotherapy were assessed every three months after CRT using RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) /EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) toxicity criteria.
12 and 24 months from chemoradiotherapy
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: 24 months after treatment
OS was defined as the time from the first day of IC first cycles until death from any cause.
24 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ilona Kulakiene, Prof., Lithuanian University of Health Sciences

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 22, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 24, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 28, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 2, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 1, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • EHNCTE-1309

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

3-7/07/2016 in ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology) Annual Meeting, Chicago

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Clinical Trials on IMRT

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings