A Study of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary (SCCUP) of the Head and Neck

A Phase I Study of Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy in Patients With Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Unknown Primary (SCCUP) of the Head and Neck

Squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary (SCCUP) site metastatic to cervical lymph nodes at presentation is a relatively rare entity forming about 2% of all head and neck carcinomas.

Typically patients are treated with ipsilateral modified radical neck dissection (MRND) and post-operative radiotherapy (PORT) or chemoradiotherapy.

There is a lack of consensus on the radiotherapy target volumes that should be treated after neck dissection. The most common radiotherapy techniques are either unilateral cervical lymph node irradiation to achieve local control in the ipsilateral neck or TMI of the head and neck region with the aim of eradicating the primary and the microscopic neck disease.

Treatment of the ipsilateral hemi-neck alone is of low toxicity and may achieve local control in the cervical nodes. Potential occult primary sites in the head and neck mucosa, and any sub-clinical metastatic disease in the contralateral side of the neck are left untreated. If a primary tumour subsequently becomes apparent the previous radiotherapy may make further radiotherapy difficult to deliver.

Some groups recommend bilateral neck and total mucosal irradiation in this setting claiming improved local control. With conventional radiotherapy technique this is at the price of significant acute toxicity and chronic morbidity, mainly xerostomia with its associated complications and effects on quality of life (QOL).

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has been shown to reduce the dose to salivary gland tissue and consequently may reduce the incidence of xerostomia and improve quality of life (QOL) in head and neck cancer patients.

An analysis of parotid-sparing IMRT at the University of Michigan established a mean dose threshold for both stimulated (26 Gy), and unstimulated (24 Gy) saliva flow rates. For the same end-point (less than 25% of flow at baseline one year post radiation) Roesink et al established a TD50 of 39 Gy.

The investigators performed a planning study to assess the feasibility of IMRT to spare the parotid gland while delivering bilateral neck and TMI. The mean dose to the contralateral parotid gland using IMRT was below the threshold of 24 Gy for unstimulated salivary flow, predicting a fairly low risk of radiation induced xerostomia. The mean dose to the ipsilateral parotid gland was 32 Gy which was below the TD50 dose based on the Roesink data.

This study assesses the safety and tolerability of delivering IMRT in clinical practice to treat patients with SCCUP of the head and neck region, who require bilateral neck and pan-mucosal irradiation.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Head and Neck Cancer
• Intervention / Treatment: Radiation: IMRT

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 19
• Phase: Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Squamous cell carcinomas metastatic to cervical lymph node with occult primary requiring bilateral neck and pan mucosal irradiation.
2. Radiotherapy either as primary therapy or post-operative (adjuvant irradiation).
3. Neoadjuvant and concomitant chemotherapy are permitted.
4. All patients must be suitable to attend regular follow-up and undergo toxicity assessment.
5. Stage T0, N1-3, M0 disease
6. WHO Performance Status 0-1.
7. Patient should have a negative PET/CT scan for a primary tumour.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Previous radiotherapy to the head and neck region
2. Previous malignancy except non-melanoma skin cancer
3. Previous or concurrent illness which in the investigators opinion would interfere with either completion of therapy or follow-up
4. Prophylactic use of amifostine or pilocarpine is not allowed
5. Brachytherapy is not allowed as part of the treatment

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: N/A
• Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

1

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Total mucosal irradiation	Radiation: IMRT

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Feasibility of delivering IMRT	Feasibility of delivering IMRT in this setting i.e. all the patients completing the radiotherapy protocol without treatment breaks due to toxicity.	7 weeks after starting radiotherapy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Incidence of acute dermatitis	Outcome measured at baseline, weeks 1-6 during RT. Weeks 1-4 and 8 after RT.	3 months after RT
Incidence of >grade 1 late xerostomia	Outcome measured at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months after RT.	5 years
Number of patients who do not relapse at the local site	Local control assessed at 3, 6 months, then every 6 months to 5 years.	5 years
Overall survival	Assessed at 3 and 6 months then every 6 months to 5 years.	5 years
Incidence of acute alopecia	Outcome measured at baseline, weeks 1-6 during RT. Weeks 1-4 and 8 after RT.	3 months after RT
Incidence of >grade 1 acute dysphagia	Outcome measured at baseline, weeks 1-6 during RT. Weeks 1-4 and 8 after RT.	3 months after RT
Incidence of > grade 1 acute mucositis	Outcome measured at baseline, weeks 1-6 during RT. Weeks 1-4 and 8 after RT.	3 months after RT
Incidence of acute radiation induced pain	Outcome measured at baseline, weeks 1-6 during RT. Weeks 1-4 and 8 after RT.	3 months after RT
Incidence of >grade 1 acute xerostomia	Outcome measured at baseline, weeks 1-6 during RT. Weeks 1-4 and 8 after RT.	3 months after RT
Incidence of acute radiation induced fatigue	Outcome measured at baseline, weeks 1-6 during RT. Weeks 1-4 and 8 after RT.	3 months after RT
Incidence of > grade 1 late dysphagia	Outcome measured at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months after RT.	5 years after RT
Incidence of late oesophageal stricture	Outcome measured at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months after RT.	5 years after RT
Incidence of >grade 1 late hoarse voice	Outcome measured at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months after RT.	5 years after RT
Incidence of late radiation induced neurological dysfunction	Outcome measured at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months after RT.	5 years
Incidence of >grade1 late skin toxicity	Outcome measured at 3, 6, 12, 18, 24 months after RT.	5 years after RT

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Christopher M Nutting, PhD, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: July 1, 2007
• Primary Completion (Actual): September 1, 2010
• Study Completion (Actual): October 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 13, 2014
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: April 9, 2014
• First Posted (Estimate): April 11, 2014

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): September 7, 2020
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 3, 2020
• Last Verified: September 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Neoplasms by Histologic Type; Neoplasms; Carcinoma; Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial; Neoplasms, Squamous Cell; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell
• Other Study ID Numbers: CCR 2823

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No