Comparison of Conventional and Hypofractionated IMRT in High-Risk Cervical Cancer Post-Radical Hysterectomy (POHIM-P3)

July 25, 2024 updated by: Won Park, Samsung Medical Center

Postoperative Conventional Versus Hypofractionated Intensity-modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Phase III Trial (POHIM_P3 Trial)

Radical hysterectomy and radiation therapy are standard treatments for cervical cancer. However, there are no reported studies on the frequency of side effects and treatment outcomes when hypofractionated radiation therapy and intensity modulated radiation therapy(IMRT) are used during radiation therapy.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy increases the daily dose and reduces the number of treatment sessions, which may increase the risk of side effects, but its safety has been confirmed in some cases of early cervical cancer and endometrial cancer. Additionally, applying IMRT, a technique designed to protect normal tissue, during concurrent chemoradiotherapy has shown positive results in reducing the incidence of acute side effects.

Investigators previously demonstrated that combining hypofractionated IMRT with chemotherapy for high-risk postoperative cervical cancer patients resulted in high survival rates and low toxicity in a phase 2 exploratory study. Base on this result, this study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of conventional fractionated radiation therapy and hypofractionated radiation therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

  • This phase 3 multicenter randomized controlled trial evaluates two radiation therapy regiments in high-risk cervical cancer patients who have undergone radical hysterectomy. Participants are randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either conventional fractionated IMRT(Intensity modulated radiation therapy) or hypo fractionated IMRT, both in combination with concurrent chemotherapy.
  • The conventional fractionation group receives 1.8-2.0 Gy per session for a total of 25-28 sessions (total 40-50.4 Gy) with weekly chemotherapy (total 5-6 sessions). The hypofractionation group receives 2.5 Gy per session for a total of 16 sessions (total 40 Gy) with weekly chemotherapy (total 3 sessions). Brachytherapy is allowed in both group.
  • Stratification factors for randomization include lymph node metastasis status and adenocarcinoma vs. non-adenocarcinoma. Blocked randomization will be used. The study aims to assess local control rates, overall, survival, disease-free survival, and acute and late toxicity profiles.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

248

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Gangnam-gu
      • Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Korea, Republic of, 06351
        • Recruiting
        • Samsung Medical Center
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients diagnosed histologically with cervical cancer
  • Patients diagnosed histologically with Squamous cell carcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, or Adenosquamous carcinoma
  • Patients who have undergone radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy
  • Patients who meet the indication for radiotherapy in postoperative pathological examination (at least on of the following):

A. Pelvic lymph node metastasis B. Parametrial involvement C. Positive surgical margins

  • Adult aged 20 to 75 years
  • Patients with an ECOG 0-1 within 1 week prior to study participation
  • Maintained bone marrow function: granulocyte ≥1.0 x 103/µl, platelets ≥30 x 103/µl, hemoglobin ≥9.5 g/dl
  • Maintained renal and liver function (Creatinine <2.0 mg/dL, Bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dl)
  • Patients who have voluntarily signed the consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with distance metastasis (including ovarian and para-aortic lymph node metastasis)
  • Patients who have previously received radiotherapy to the pelvic area
  • Patients who have undergone radical hysterectomy more than 3 months prior
  • Patients with untreated serious acute illnesses (e.g., stroke, cerebral infarction, myocardial infarction) other than cervical cancer
  • Patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery
  • Patients who will not receive concurrent chemotherapy during radiotherapy
  • Patients with a history of another cancer diagnosis within the past 5 years, except for thyroid cancer, skin cancer, or carcinoma in suit

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Conventional Fractionation Group

The conventional fractionation group will receive 1.8-2.0G per session for a total of 25-28 sessions, amounting to 40-50.4Gy of radiation therapy. Chemotherapy will be administered once a week for a total of 5-6 sessions.

This group are allowed to receive brachytherapy.

  • Dose: 1.8-2.0 Gy per session, total 25-28 sessions (40-50.4Gy)
  • Chemotherapy: Weekly, total 5-6 sessions
Experimental: Hypofractionation Group

The hypofractionation group will receive 2.5Gy per session for a total of 16 sessions, amounting to 40 Gy of radiation therapy. Chemotherapy will be administered once a week for a total of 3 sessions.

This group are allowed to receive brachytherapy.

  • Dose: 2.5 Gy per session, total 16 sessions (40Gy)
  • Chemotherapy: Weekly, total 3 sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Local control rate for the radiation treatment area
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
The percentage of patients who achieve local control of their cervical cancer within the radiation treatment area. Local control is defined as the absence of tumor recurrence or progression in the region.
Up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival (OS)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The duration of time from the date of randomization until death from any cause. This measure will evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment in prolonging life.
Up to 5 years
Disease-free survival (DFS)
Time Frame: Up to 5 years
The length of time from the date of randomization until the occurrence of any signs or symptoms of cervical cancer, such as local recurrence, distant metastasis, or secondary cancer. This measure assesses the efficacy of the treatment in preventing cancer recurrence.
Up to 5 years
Acute Toxicity Profile
Time Frame: During treatment and up to 3 months post-treatment
The incidence and severity of acute treatment-related toxicities, as measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Acute toxicities are those occurring within 90days of the start of treatment.
During treatment and up to 3 months post-treatment
Late Toxicity Profile
Time Frame: From 3 months post-treatment up to 5 years
The incidence and severity of late treatment-related toxicities, as measured by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Late toxicities are those occurring more than 90 days after the completion of treatment.
From 3 months post-treatment up to 5 years
Quality of life (QoL)
Time Frame: Baseline, end of treatment, 6 months post-treatment, and annually up to 5 years
Assessment of the patients' quality of life using validated questionnaires such as the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30). This measure evaluates the impact of treatment on the patients' overall well-being.
Baseline, end of treatment, 6 months post-treatment, and annually up to 5 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 19, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2032

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 9, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 26, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 25, 2024

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

Clinical Trials on Conventional Fractionated IMRT

Subscribe