Serratus Anterior Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Postmastectomy Analgesia (SAM)

April 8, 2018 updated by: Ghada M N Bashandy, National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Serratus Anterior Muscle Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block for Breast Cancer Resections.

ًًًُُُُThe investigators are testing the efficacy of a new novel technique; serratus anterior plane block, for preventing postoperative pain after breast surgery for cancer. This block will be compared with the well-established paravertebral block.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Paravertebral block (PVB) can be considered as a well-established option to provide anesthesia and postoperative analgesia during breast surgery. For patients receiving a PVB alone or in combination with general anesthesia significant lower resting, evoked and worst pain scores compared with other analgesic treatment strategies indicating that a PVB provides improved postoperative pain control in patients undergoing breast surgery. Furthermore, there might be a reduced need for postoperative opioid requirements and consecutively a decrease in opioid-induced adverse effects in patients receiving a PVB. Anyways there are always fear of pleural injury and pneumothorax in addition to epidural and intrathecal spread of the block. A novel newly introduced field block has been described recently to block the hemithorax under ultrasound guidance that is the Serratus Anterior Muscle Plane SAM block. Still this technique to the investigators knowledge is not tried in randomized clinical studies. The aim of this study is to find out that this new technique is comparable to PVB in patients undergoing breast surgeries with or without axillary node dissection.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
    • Kasr Alainy
      • Cairo, Kasr Alainy, Egypt, 11796
        • National Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • unilateral mastectomy with or without axillary lymph node dissection.
  • American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) I&II

Exclusion Criteria:

  • morbid obesity (body mass index > 40 kg/m2);
  • renal insufficiency (creatinine > 1.5 mg/dL),
  • current chronic analgesic therapy (daily use > 4 weeks),
  • a history of opioid dependence, pregnancy,
  • inability to communicate with the investigators or hospital staff,
  • American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) III-IV

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Serratus anterior muscle plane block
Serratus anterior muscle plane block with general anesthesia MARCAINE® 0.25%w/v solution for injection. DIPRIVAN® (propofol), 2 to 2.5 mg/kg NIMBEX® (cisatracurium besylate) Injection, 0.15-0.2 mg\Kg Fentanyl, 1-2 mic\Kg Paracetamol, 1000 mg\6 hours Fam® (Ketorolac), 30 mg
Procedure: Serratus Anterior Muscle Plane block (SAM block)
The US probe is placed in the mid-axillary line at level of the 6th intercostal space. From caudal to cranial, an in-plane approach, the block needle is inserted until the tip is placed between SAM and intercostal muscles and the LA injection will be visualized in real-time. The injection usually consists of 0.4ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.25% plus adrenaline (5ug/ml). Intraoperatively, all subjects will receive a general anesthetic using inhaled anesthetic and oxygen. Intravenous fentanyl will be administered for cardiovascular stability to noxious stimuli.For postoperative analgesia, all subjects will receive oral acetaminophen. Patients will receive a ketorolac IV injection then morphine as a rescue analgesic for breakthrough pain.
Other Names:
  • Serratus anterior block
  • intercostal nerve block
Active Comparator: Paravertebral block
Paravertebral block with general anesthesia. MARCAINE® 0.25%w/v solution for injection. DIPRIVAN® (propofol), 2 to 2.5 mg/kg NIMBEX® (cisatracurium besylate) Injection, 0.15-0.2 mg\Kg Fentanyl, 1-2 mic\Kg Paracetamol, 1000 mg\6 hours Fam® (Ketorolac), 30 mg
Procedure: Paravertebral Block
After skin preparation and sterile draping applied. Target paravertebral space will be located using US guidance. The paravertebral space between the third and fourth thoracic vertebrae will be identified in a parasagittal view approximately 3 cm lateral to midline on the side of surgery. A local anesthetic skin wheal will be raised caudal to the ultrasound transducer. A 17-gauge, Tuohy-tip needle will be inserted through the skin wheal in-plane beneath the ultrasound transducer and directed to the paravertebral space. Normal saline (5 mL) will be injected via the needle to help identify the paravertebral space and observe the pleura being displaced anteriorly. 0.4 ml\kg of 0.25% Bupivacaine with epinephrine, 5 μg/mL, will be slowly injected with gentle aspiration every 3 mL.
Other Names:
  • Thoracic Paravertebral block

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain relief
Time Frame: first postoperative day
reduction of pain intensities in the first postoperative day after breast surgery for cancer.
first postoperative day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
opioid consumption
Time Frame: intraoperative and first postoperative day
intraoperative and postoperative opioid consumption
intraoperative and first postoperative day

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: first week after surgery
measure patient satisfaction a week after surgery
first week after surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
National Cancer Institute, Egypt

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Ghada MN Bashandy, MD, Lecturer of anesthesia & pain relief

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 1, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 4, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 8, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NCI- Cairo

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings