Letermovir (MK-8228) Versus Placebo in the Prevention of Clinically-Significant Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection in Adult, CMV-Seropositive Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients (MK-8228-001)

August 29, 2019 updated by: Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

A Phase III Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of MK-8228 (Letermovir) for the Prevention of Clinically Significant Human Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection in Adult, CMV-Seropositive Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of letermovir (MK-8228) for the prevention of clinically-significant CMV infection in adult, CMV-seropositive recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The hypothesis being tested was that MK-8228 is superior to placebo in the prevention of clinically-significant CMV infection through Week 24 post-transplant.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
570

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Has documented seropositivity for CMV within 1 year before hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT)
  • Receiving first allogeneic HSCT (bone marrow, peripheral blood stem cell, or cord blood transplant)
  • Female or male participant who is not of reproductive potential, or, if of reproductive potential, agrees to true abstinence or to use (or have their partner use) 2 acceptable methods of birth control from the time of consent through 90 days after the last dose of study drug
  • Able to read, understand, and complete questionnaires and diaries

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Received a previous allogeneic HSCT (previous autologous HSCT is acceptable)
  • History of CMV end-organ disease within 6 months before randomization
  • Has evidence of CMV viremia (if tested) at any time from either signing of the Informed Consent Form or the HSCT procedure, whichever is earlier, until the time of randomization.
  • Received the following within 7 days before screening or plans to receive during the study: ganciclovir, valganciclovir, foscarnet, acyclovir, valacyclovir, or famciclovir
  • Received the following within 30 days before screening or plan to receive during the study: cidofovir, CMV hyper-immune globulin, any investigational CMV antiviral agent or biological therapy
  • Has suspected or known hypersensitivity to ingredients of MK-8228 (letermovir) formulations
  • Has severe hepatic insufficiency within 5 days before randomization
  • Has end-stage renal impairment
  • Has an uncontrolled infection on the day of randomization
  • Requires mechanical ventilation or is hemodynamically unstable at the time of randomization
  • Has documented positive results for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody, hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody with detectable HCV ribonucleic acid, or hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) within 90 days before randomization
  • Has active solid tumor malignancies with the exception of localized basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or the condition under treatment (for example, lymphoma)
  • Is pregnant or expecting to conceive, is breastfeeding, or plans to breastfeed from the time of consent through 90 days after the last dose of study drug
  • Is expecting to donate eggs or sperm from the time of consent through 90 days after the last dose of study drug
  • Has participated in a study with an unapproved investigational compound (monoclonal antibodies are excepted) or device within 28 days of the first dose of study drug
  • Has previously participated in a MK-8228 (letermovir) study
  • Has, is, or is planning (during the study) to participate in any study involving administration of a CMV vaccine or another CMV investigational agent
  • Is a user of recreational or illicit drugs or has a recent history (<=1 year) of drug or alcohol abuse or dependence

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Letermovir
Letermovir oral or intravenous (IV) formulation was administered once daily for up to 14 weeks, beginning up to Day 28 days post-transplant. The dose was 240 mg once daily for participants receiving concomitant cyclosporin A and 480 mg once daily for participants not receiving cyclosporin A. Intravenous infusion was administered only to participants who are unable to swallow tablets or who have a condition that may interfere with absorption of the tablets.
Drug: Letermovir
Letermovir 240 mg / 480 mg tablets, or 240 mg / 480 mg intravenous solution in 250 mL to be infused over 60 minutes.
Other Names:
  • MK-8228
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Placebo oral or IV formulation was administered once daily for up to 14 weeks, beginning up to Day 28 post-transplant. The number of placebo tablets was to mimic that for letermovir administration according to the concomitant cyclosporin A status. Intravenous infusion was administered only to participants who are unable to swallow tablets or who have a condition that may interfere with absorption of the tablets.
Drug: Placebo
Placebo tablets, or intravenous solution in 250 mL to be infused over 60 minutes.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With Clinically-significant CMV Infection up to Week 24 Post-transplant
Time Frame: Up to Week 24 post-transplant
Clinically-significant CMV infection was defined as either one of the following: 1) onset of CMV end-organ disease, or 2) initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The percentage of participants with clinically-significant CMV infection was assessed.
Up to Week 24 post-transplant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Onset of Clinically-significant CMV Infection (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With a Qualifying Event at Week 24 Post-transplant)
Time Frame: Up to Week 24 post-transplant
Clinically-significant CMV infection was defined as either one of the following: 1) onset of CMV end-organ disease, or 2) initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. Time to onset of clinically-significant CMV infection was defined from the day of transplantation to the day the participant developed clinically-significant CMV infection, and was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants were censored at the last assessment for participants who discontinued or did not develop clinically-significant CMV infection.
Up to Week 24 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With Clinically-significant CMV Infection up to Week 14 Post-transplant
Time Frame: Up to Week 14 post-transplant
Clinically-significant CMV infection was defined as either one of the following: 1) onset of CMV end-organ disease, or 2) initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The percentage of participants with clinically-significant CMV infection was assessed.
Up to Week 14 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With CMV End-organ Disease up to Week 24 Post-transplant
Time Frame: Up to Week 24 post-transplant
CMV end-organ disease met per-protocol diagnostic criteria for CMV-pneumonia, gastrointestinal disease, hepatitis, central nervous system disease, retinitis, nephritis, cystitis, myocarditis, pancreatitis, or other disease categories. Only Clinical Adjudication Committee-confirmed CMV end-organ disease was included in this analysis. The percentage of participants with CMV end-organ disease was assessed.
Up to Week 24 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With CMV End-organ Disease up to Week 14 Post-transplant
Time Frame: Up to Week 14 post-transplant
CMV end-organ disease met per-protocol diagnostic criteria for CMV-pneumonia, gastrointestinal disease, hepatitis, central nervous system disease, retinitis, nephritis, cystitis, myocarditis, pancreatitis, or other disease categories. Only Clinical Adjudication Committee-confirmed CMV end-organ disease was included in this analysis. The percentage of participants with CMV end-organ disease was assessed.
Up to Week 14 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With Pre-emptive Therapy for CMV Viremia up to Week 14 Post-transplant
Time Frame: Up to Week 14 post-transplant
Initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy was based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The percentage of participants with initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive anti-CMV therapy was assessed.
Up to Week 14 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants With Pre-emptive Therapy for CMV Viremia up to Week 24 Post-transplant
Time Frame: Up to Week 24 post-transplant
Initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy was based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The percentage of participants with initiation of anti-CMV pre-emptive anti-CMV therapy was assessed.
Up to Week 24 post-transplant
Time to Initiation of Pre-emptive Therapy for CMV Viremia (Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Percentage of Participants With a Qualifying Event at Week 24 Post-transplant)
Time Frame: Up to Week 24 post-transplant
The need for anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy was based on documented CMV viremia and the clinical condition of the participant. The outcome was calculated from the day of transplantation to the start of anti-CMV pre-emptive therapy, and was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Participants were censored at the last assessment for participants who discontinued or did not initiate pre-emptive therapy.
Up to Week 24 post-transplant

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With One or More Adverse Events up to Week 48 Post-transplant
Time Frame: Up to Week 48 post-transplant
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event.
Up to Week 48 post-transplant
Percentage of Participants Discontinued From Study Medication Due to an Adverse Event
Time Frame: Up to Week 14 post-transplant
An adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product or protocol-specified procedure. Any worsening of a preexisting condition that is temporally associated with the use of the Sponsor's product, is also an adverse event.
Up to Week 14 post-transplant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 6, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 8, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
November 21, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
May 12, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 12, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 11, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • 8228-001
  • 2013-003831-31 (EudraCT Number)
  • 152923 (Registry Identifier: JAPIC-CTI)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Yes

IPD Plan Description

http://engagezone.msd.com/doc/ProcedureAccessClinicalTrialData.pdf

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prevention of CMV Infection or Disease

Clinical Trials on Letermovir

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings