Assessment of the I-gel and Air-Q Supraglottic Airways as Conduits for Tracheal Intubation in Children
A Randomized Comparison of the I-gel and Air-Q as Conduits for Fiberoptic-guided Tracheal Intubation in Children
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Illinois
-
Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
- Anne & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Children undergoing general anesthesia requiring tracheal intubation
- Age one month to six years
Exclusion Criteria:
- ASA class IV, V
- Children receiving emergent surgery
- History or high suspicion of a difficult airway
- Active upper respiratory tract infection
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: air-Q
Patients will receive the air-Q with size based on manufacturer recommendations of body weight
|
Patients randomized to this intervention will have the air-Q placed following induction of general anesthesia.
Subsequent tracheal intubation will be performed using the device as a conduit for fiberoptic-guided intubation.
Following successful tracheal intubation, the device will be removed.
|
|
Experimental: i-gel
Patients will receive the i-gel with size based on manufacturer recommendations of body weight
|
Patients randomized to this intervention will have the i-gel placed following induction of general anesthesia.
Subsequent tracheal intubation will be performed using the device as a conduit for fiberoptic-guided intubation.
Following successful tracheal intubation, the device will be removed.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Successful Tracheal Intubation
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Time to successful tracheal intubation when using fiberoptic bronchoscopy to intubate through the i-gel or air-Q ILA.
Three separate times will be measured by an independent observer: 1) Time to first glottic view: defined as the duration of time ending with the first view of the glottic opening.
2) Time to carinal view: defined as the duration of time ending with visualization of the carina.
3) Time to successful tracheal intubation: defined as the duration of time ending with the observation of a square wave end-tidal capnogram after successful tracheal intubation
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Ease of Placement of Supraglottic Airway
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Ease of placement of supraglottic device ranging from 1 (easy) to 4 (difficult).
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Number of Attempts to Place the Supraglottic Device
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Number of attempts will be limited to 3
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Supraglottic Airway Leak Pressure
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
The airway pressure at which an airway leak is observed after placement of the supraglottic airway
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Fiberoptic Grade of Laryngeal View
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Fiberoptic Grade of Laryngeal View through either the air Q or i-gel will be graded using a previously published grading system
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Airway Maneuvers
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
The number and type of airway maneuvers performed during tracheal intubation will be recorded
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Postoperative Complications
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and 24 hours postoperatively
|
Complications noted postoperatively relating to the airway, such as sore throat or hoarseness.
|
Participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and 24 hours postoperatively
|
|
Time to Placement of Supraglottic Airway
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Time to placement of supraglottic device will be measured.
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
|
Number of Attempts to Place the Tracheal Tube
Time Frame: participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Number of attempts to place the tracheal tube via fiberoptic bronchoscopy through supraglottic device will be limited to 3
|
participants will be followed for the duration of anesthesia and after surgery, an expected average of 12 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Narasimhan Jagannathan, MD, Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago / Stanley Manne Research Institute
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Park C, Bahk JH, Ahn WS, Do SH, Lee KH. The laryngeal mask airway in infants and children. Can J Anaesth. 2001 Apr;48(4):413-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03014975.
- Timmermann A. Supraglottic airways in difficult airway management: successes, failures, use and misuse. Anaesthesia. 2011 Dec;66 Suppl 2:45-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06934.x.
- Sohn LE, Jagannathan N, Sequera-Ramos L, Sawardekar A, Schaldenbrand K, De Oliveira GS. A randomised comparison of free-handed vs air-Q assisted fibreoptic-guided tracheal intubation in children < 2 years of age. Anaesthesia. 2014 Jul;69(7):723-8. doi: 10.1111/anae.12667. Epub 2014 May 2.
- Mathis MR, Haydar B, Taylor EL, Morris M, Malviya SV, Christensen RE, Ramachandran SK, Kheterpal S. Failure of the Laryngeal Mask Airway Unique and Classic in the pediatric surgical patient: a study of clinical predictors and outcomes. Anesthesiology. 2013 Dec;119(6):1284-95. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000015.
- Abukawa Y, Hiroki K, Ozaki M. Initial experience of the i-gel supraglottic airway by the residents in pediatric patients. J Anesth. 2012 Jun;26(3):357-61. doi: 10.1007/s00540-011-1322-1. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
- Foucher-Lezla A, Lehousse T, Monrigal JP, Granry JC, Beydon L. Fibreoptic assessment of laryngeal positioning of the paediatric supraglottic airway device I-Gel. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 Jul;30(7):441-2. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32835f9969. No abstract available.
- Hughes C, Place K, Berg S, Mason D. A clinical evaluation of the I-gel supraglottic airway device in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Aug;22(8):765-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03893.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
- Jagannathan N, Sommers K, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Shah RD, Mukherji II, Miller S, Voronov P, Seraphin S. A randomized equivalence trial comparing the i-gel and laryngeal mask airway Supreme in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Feb;23(2):127-33. doi: 10.1111/pan.12078. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
- Emmerich M, Tiesmeier J. The I-gel supraglottic airway: a useful tool in case of difficult fiberoptic intubation. Minerva Anestesiol. 2012 Oct;78(10):1169-70. No abstract available.
- Kim YL, Seo DM, Shim KS, Kim EJ, Lee JH, Lee SG, Ban JS. Successful tracheal intubation using fiberoptic bronchoscope via an I-gel supraglottic airway in a pediatric patient with Goldenhar syndrome -A case report-. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013 Jul;65(1):61-5. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2013.65.1.61. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
- Kim MS, Oh JT, Min JY, Lee KH, Lee JR. A randomised comparison of the i-gel and the Laryngeal Mask Airway Classic in infants. Anaesthesia. 2014 Apr;69(4):362-7. doi: 10.1111/anae.12592.
- Jagannathan N, Sohn LE, Sawardekar A, Gordon J, Shah RD, Mukherji II, Roth AG, Suresh S. A randomized trial comparing the Ambu (R) Aura-i with the air-Q intubating laryngeal airway as conduits for tracheal intubation in children. Paediatr Anaesth. 2012 Dec;22(12):1197-204. doi: 10.1111/pan.12024. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
- Jagannathan N, Sohn L, Ramsey M, Huang A, Sawardekar A, Sequera-Ramos L, Kromrey L, De Oliveira GS. A randomized comparison between the i-gel and the air-Q supraglottic airways when used by anesthesiology trainees as conduits for tracheal intubation in children. Can J Anaesth. 2015 Jun;62(6):587-94. doi: 10.1007/s12630-014-0304-9. Epub 2014 Dec 24.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- I-gel versus air-Q
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.