Fish Oil Trials in Pregnancy for the Prevention of Pregnancy Complications ('FOTIP') (FOTIP)

August 29, 2014 updated by: Sjurdur Frodi Olsen

Randomised Clinical Trials of Fish Oil Supplementation in High Risk Pregnancies

The initial trial examined if fish oil supplementation during pregnancy could reduce the risk of pregnancy induced hypertension, intrauterine growth retardation, and preterm birth in pregnancies that were at increased risk of these complications. The study was designed as a multi-centre clinical trial based in 19 hospitals in seven countries in Europe.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1619

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • There were six subgroups with different inclusion criteria:
  • The low dose (prophylactic) section enrolled women who after 16 weeks of gestation had been identified with an uncomplicated pregnancy, who in an earlier pregnancy had experienced preterm delivery (this was subgroup 1)
  • Intrauterine growth retardation (subgroup 2) or pregnancy induced hypertension (subgroup 3)
  • Women who had been identified with twin pregnancies (subgroup 4)
  • The high dose ('therapeutic') section enrolled women with threatening pre-eclampsia (subgroup 5) or suspected intrauterine growth retardation in the current pregnancy (subgroup 6).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetes mellitus in or before pregnancy
  • Diagnosed severe fetal malformation or hydrops in current pregnancy
  • Suspicion in current pregnancy, or occurrence in an earlier pregnancy, of placental abruption
  • Drug or alcohol abuse
  • Regular intake of fish oil or of non-steroidal antiinflammatory agents or other drugs with an effect on thombocyte function or eicosanoid metabolism
  • Allergy to fish products.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Low dose fish oil
Dietary supplement: Low dose fish oil
Four 1g gelatine capsules with fish oil (Pikasol: 32 % eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3), 23 % docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) and 2 mg tocopherol/ml)) corresponding to 2.7 g n-3 fatty acids per day.
Other Names:
  • Pikasol
Placebo Comparator: Low dose olive oil
Dietary supplement: Low dose olive oil
Four 1 g capsules with olive oil (72 % oleic acid (18:1n-9) and 12 % linoleic acid (18:2n-6)) per day.
Experimental: High dose fish oil
Dietary supplement: High dose fish oil
Nine 1g gelatine capsules with fish oil (Pikasol: 32 % eicosapentaenoic acid (20:5n-3), 23 % docosahexaenoic acid (22:6n-3) and 2 mg tocopherol/ml)) corresponding to 6.1 g n-3 fatty acids per day.
Other Names:
  • Pikasol
Placebo Comparator: High dose olive oil
Dietary supplement: High dose olive oil
Nine 1g gelatine capsules with olive oil (72 % oleic acid (18:1n-9) and 12 % linoleic acid (18:2n-6)) per day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of pregnancy and the first few days after delivery, on average 20-26 weeks from recruitment and randomization.
One or more recorded measurements of a diastolic blood pressure of above 90 mmHg at rest
Participants will be followed for the duration of pregnancy and the first few days after delivery, on average 20-26 weeks from recruitment and randomization.
Intrauterine growth retardation
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of pregnancy and the first few days after delivery, on average 20-26 weeks from recruitment and randomization.
Birth weight below the 10th centile, as assessed from the infant's birth weight, gestational age and gender, on the basis of Danish standards (Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1986; 93: 128-134; and Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 1985; 64: 65-70).
Participants will be followed for the duration of pregnancy and the first few days after delivery, on average 20-26 weeks from recruitment and randomization.
Preterm delivery
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of pregnancy and the first few days after delivery, on average 20-26 weeks from recruitment and randomization.
Delivery at an estimated gestational age of less than 259 days (37 completed weeks)
Participants will be followed for the duration of pregnancy and the first few days after delivery, on average 20-26 weeks from recruitment and randomization.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Sjurdur Frodi Olsen

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Rigshospitalet, Denmark

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Niels J Secher, Professor, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
  • Principal Investigator: Sjurdur F Olsen, Professor, Center for Fetal Programming, Denmark

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 1990

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 1996

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 1999

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 3, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
September 1, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 1, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 29, 2014

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • DT2006-41-6257

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings