Comparison Study of 'Virtual Teacher' Support for Rehabilitation After Stroke. (MAVASI)
Assessment of a Virtual Teacher Feedback for the Recovery of Upper Limb After Stroke.
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Phase
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Venice, Italy, 30126
- Azienda Ulss 3 Serenissima
-
-
VE
-
Venezia, VE, Italy, 30126
- San Camillo IRCCS
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- first single stroke,
- absence of ideomotor apraxia, neglect, aphasia interfering with verbal comprehension,
- 0 < NIHSS-IT < 4
Exclusion Criteria:
- bilateral or cerebellum stroke,
- unstable medical conditions,
- fracture,
- major depressive disorders,
- other neurological conditions,
- epilepsy.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Number of Arms
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / ArmParticipant Group / Arm |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: EVER TEACHER
In EVER TEACHER group a specific feedback called "virtual teacher" will be displayed.
The virtual teacher perform the correct movement to emulate, that is supposed to stimulate the motor adaptation exploiting a supervised learning mechanism.
This feedback will give an on-line information on motor performance quality, allowing a real time visual comparison between patient's own execution and teacher one.
During the experiment, patients will receive 1 hour of virtual reality-based therapy and the treatment will last 1 hour a day, five days weekly for four weeks.
|
The treatment will be performed in a darkened room, to avoid distraction provided by environmental stimuli.
The patients will be seat on a standard chair in front of a wall screen handling a sensorized object with plegic hand.
In case of grasping deficits the hand's surface will be used as end effector (i.e.
sensorized glove worn by the patient).
During the treatment a specific feedback called "virtual teacher" will be displayed.
The Reinforced Feedback in Virtual Environment (RFVE) approach consists of performing different motor tasks moving the end effector simultaneously displayed in the virtual scenario.
The Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRRS®.
Khymeia Group, Noventa Padovana.
Italy) will be used as device to provide the artificial environment.
|
|
Other: NEVER TEACHER
In NEVER TEACHER group the subjects will be asked to perform the same exercises with the upper limb without the virtual teacher assistance.
The treatment will last four weeks with daily sessions of 60 minutes, five times per week.
|
The patients allocated to NEVER TEACHER group, will be treated using the VRRS and the proceedings will be the same as described for experimental group.
In this group, the patient will move the real object (e.g.
ball) following the trajectory of the corresponding virtual object displayed on the wall screen in accordance with the requested virtual task and without the 'virtual teacher' support.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer Upper Extremity scale (FM UE)
Time Frame: Change from baseline FM UE scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 20 sessions).
|
Change from baseline FM UE scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Sensation
Time Frame: Change from baseline of the Reaching Performance scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 20 sessions).
|
Change from baseline of the Reaching Performance scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
|
Fugl-Meyer Assessment - Pain and ROM
Time Frame: Change from baseline of the Reaching Performance scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 20 sessions).
|
Change from baseline of the Reaching Performance scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
|
Reaching Performance Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline of the Reaching Performance scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 20 sessions).
|
Change from baseline of the Reaching Performance scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
|
Modified Ashworth Scale
Time Frame: Change from baseline of the Modified Ashworth scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 20 sessions).
|
Change from baseline of the Modified Ashworth scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
|
Functional Independence Measure scale (FIM)
Time Frame: Change from baseline of the Functional Independence Measure scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 20 sessions).
|
Change from baseline of the Functional Independence Measure scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
|
Nine Hole Pegboard Test
Time Frame: Change from baseline of the Functional Independence Measure scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
Applied at the beginning and at the end of treatment (after 20 sessions).
|
Change from baseline of the Functional Independence Measure scale at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
Other Outcome Measures
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Kinematic Assessment
Time Frame: Change from baseline of the following parameters; speed, time, peak at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
The kinematic assessment include the execution of standardised upper limb movements, such as: forearm pronation and supination, elbow flexion and extension, shoulder abduction and adduction, shoulder internal and external rotation, shoulder flexion and extension and reaching movements.
The mean linear velocity (Speed), the mean duration of movements (Time) and the mean number of submovements (Peak) will be measured, by means of the Virtual Reality Rehabilitation System (VRRS®.
Khymeia Group, Noventa Padovana.
Italy).
The data will be registered at the beginning and at the end of treatment, 4 weeks thereafter.
|
Change from baseline of the following parameters; speed, time, peak at the end of Virtual therapy (four weeks thereafter)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Collaborators
Collaborators
Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Andrea Turolla, PhD, San Camillo IRCCS
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Turolla A, Dam M, Ventura L, Tonin P, Agostini M, Zucconi C, Kiper P, Cagnin A, Piron L. Virtual reality for the rehabilitation of the upper limb motor function after stroke: a prospective controlled trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2013 Aug 1;10:85. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-10-85.
- Kiper P, Agostini M, Luque-Moreno C, Tonin P, Turolla A. Reinforced feedback in virtual environment for rehabilitation of upper extremity dysfunction after stroke: preliminary data from a randomized controlled trial. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:752128. doi: 10.1155/2014/752128. Epub 2014 Mar 13.
- Zucconi C, Valt V, Agostini M, Turolla A, Tonin P, Piron L. Assessment of a virtual teacher feedback for the recovery of the upper limb after stroke. Italian Journal of Physiotherapy 2011;1(4):101-6.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- Protocollo 2013.11
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.