A Patient-Centered Strategy for Improving Diabetes Prevention in Urban American Indians

August 6, 2025 updated by: Randall Stafford, Stanford University
The goal of the proposed research is to identify effective patient-centered strategies to prevent diabetes in high-risk populations in real world settings. The investigators will accomplish this by conducting a randomized controlled trial comparing an enhanced Diabetes Prevention Program addressing psychosocial stressors to a standard version in a high-risk population of urban American Indian and Alaska Native people within a primary care setting.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The goal of the proposed research is to identify effective patient-centered strategies to prevent diabetes in high-risk populations in real world settings. The investigators will accomplish this by conducting a randomized controlled trial comparing an enhanced Diabetes Prevention Program addressing psychosocial stressors to a standard version in a high-risk population of urban American Indian and Alaska Native peoples within a primary care setting. Diabetes is disproportionately prevalent among low-socioeconomic status and racial/ethnic minority populations in the US. The high prevalence of psychosocial stressors such as depression, discrimination, and exposure to trauma among these populations contributes to the high prevalence of diabetes and interferes with successful completion of lifestyle interventions. The investigators hypothesize that a DPP that directly addresses these psychosocial stressors will be superior to the standard DPP in addressing this disparity in diabetes.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
207

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • San Jose, California, United States, 95128
        • Timpany Center of San Jose State University
      • Stanford, California, United States, 94305
        • Stanford University School of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Urban of Indigenous Ancestry from the Americas (North, Central and South America)
  • Men and women
  • BMI Between 30-55
  • Not diagnosed with Type II Diabetes

  • At least one of the following criterion

    1. Triglycerides: 150mg/dL or higher
    2. Reduced HDL: <40mg/dL (men); <50mg/dL (women)
    3. Blood pressure: >130/80 or current treatment with antihypertensives
    4. Fasting glucose: >100mg/dL

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant medical comorbidities, including uncontrolled metabolic disorders (e.g., thyroid, diabetes, renal, liver), unstable heart disease, heart failure, and ongoing substance abuse;
  • On greater than 10 prescription medications.
  • Psychiatric disorders requiring atypical antipsychotics or multiple medications;
  • Inappropriate for moderate exercise according to the Revised Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire;
  • Pregnant, planning to become pregnant, or lactating;
  • Family household member already enrolled in the study;
  • Already enrolled or planning to enroll in a clinical trial that would limit full participation in the study;
  • Resident of a long term care facility;
  • Lack of spoken English by patient or a household member > 18 y who can serve as interpreter;
  • Plans to move during the study period (9 months post-randomization);
  • Investigator discretion for clinical safety or adherence reasons (e.g., unstable housing, chronic pain).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Standard Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP)
Participants receive Standard DPP over the course of 20 weeks.
Behavioral: Standard DPP
The Standard Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) delivered by the San Jose State Timpany Center is the Group Lifestyle Balance™ DPP, which has previously been tailored for urban American Indians and Alaska Natives by the Indian Health Service. Standard DPP components consist of 16 group classes, 4 visits with a lifestyle coach and access to a therapeutic swimming pool and gym.
Experimental: Enhanced DPP
Participants receive Standard DPP plus Enhanced DPP over the course of 20 weeks.
Behavioral: Standard DPP
The Standard Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) delivered by the San Jose State Timpany Center is the Group Lifestyle Balance™ DPP, which has previously been tailored for urban American Indians and Alaska Natives by the Indian Health Service. Standard DPP components consist of 16 group classes, 4 visits with a lifestyle coach and access to a therapeutic swimming pool and gym.
Behavioral: Enhanced DPP
Enhanced DPP components consist of access to a mental health counselor, active referrals to mental health services, and traditional healing workshops such as the use of talking circles, a modified photo voice and digital storytelling to address specific psychosocial issues that are a result of historical trauma, stress, and grief.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) Through Month 12
Time Frame: Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
BMI is measured as weight in kg divided by the square of height in meters.
Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Change From Baseline in the Quality of Life Short Form Survey (SF-12)
Time Frame: Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
SF-12 scale is a generic, multipurpose short-form survey with 12 questions selected from the SF-36 Health Survey to evaluate overall health-related quality of life. Answers are combined, scored and weighted into mental and physical functioning component scales. The scores for each scale range from 0 to 100. A higher value indicates a better quality of life of the patient.
Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Food Frequency Questionnaire (FFQ) Score as a Measure of Healthy and Unhealthy Diet Choices
Time Frame: Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
The FFQ modified to incorporate culturally-relevant food choices (e.g. corn tortillas and frybread) was used. Food items were scored on a scale of 1 to 6 (6 corresponding to the greatest frequency of consumption), and categorized as "healthy," "unhealthy," and "undetermined" based on classifications previously determined by Teuful-Shone et al. "Healthy" foods were those recommended for increased intake (e.g. green leafy salad). "Unhealthy" foods were recommended for decreased intake (e.g. soft drinks), and all remaining foods were "undetermined." Healthy and unhealthy food scores (but not undetermined) were collected for this outcome measure. Scores were summed for a total score. Healthy food choices (6 questions) score range 3-36 (higher scores mean healthier diet). Unhealthy food choices (13 questions) score range: 13-78 (lower scores mean healthier diet).
Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Change From Baseline in Physical Activity Measured in Metabolic Equivalents (MET) Per Week
Time Frame: Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

MET is a term used to represent the intensity of exercise. A MET is the ratio of the rate of energy expended during an activity to the rate of energy expended at rest. At least 1000 MET minutes per week are needed to lower the risk of disease.

  • 1 minute of light-intensity activities = 1.1 MET to 2.9 METs
  • 1 minute of moderate-intensity activities = 3.0 to 5.9 METs
  • 1 minute of vigorous-intensity activities = 6.0 METs or more
Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Change From Baseline in the Center for Epidemiologic Studies - Depression Scale (CES-D) as a Measure of Mental Health Symptoms
Time Frame: Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
The CES-D (Radloff, 1977) is a 20-item, self-report scale designed to assess the presence and severity of depressive symptoms over the past week. The total range is 0-80, with higher scores reflecting more severe depression symptoms.
Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
Change From Baseline in Empowerment
Time Frame: Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months
The Growth and Empowerment Measure (GEM) was developed to measure change in dimensions of empowerment as defined and described by Aboriginal Australians who participated in the Family Well Being programme. The GEM has two components. The 14-item Emotional Empowerment Scale has a range of 12-60, with higher scores corresponding to more ability to feel and show the signs of empowerment . The 12-item Scenarios scale has a range of 12-84, with higher scores corresponding to better emotional empowerment in different scenarios.
Change through month 12, with assessments at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Systolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Blood pressure readings are expressed in millimeters of mercury. This unit is abbreviated as mm Hg. A normal reading would be any blood pressure below 120/80 mm Hg and above 90/60 mm Hg in an adult.
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Diastolic Blood Pressure
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Blood pressure readings are expressed in millimeters of mercury (mmHg). A normal reading would be any blood pressure below 120/80 mm Hg and above 90/60 mm Hg in an adult.
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Fasting Blood Glucose
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Performed via fasting participant finger stick with Alere Cholestech LDX POS device.
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Symptoms of Historical Trauma
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
By patient report using a modified version of the Indigenous People's Survey
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Waist Circumference
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
In centimeters, measured by trained assessor using standard protocol
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
Lipid Bioassays
Time Frame: Baseline, 6 months and 12 months
LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, and Triglycerides; performed via fasting participant finger stick with Alere Cholestech LDX POS device
Baseline, 6 months and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Stanford University

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
San Jose State University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Randall S Stafford, MD, PhD, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
June 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 13, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 16, 2014

First Posted (Estimated)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 17, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
August 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
August 6, 2025

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SU-30015
  • PCORI-PCORIAD-1306-02172 (Other Grant/Funding Number: Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings