Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer (DAVID)

May 31, 2016 updated by: Technische Universität Dresden

Randomized Controlled Trial of Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer - The DAVID-study

The present randomized controlled trial evaluates the incidence of R1 resections in patients undergoing robotic distal pancreatectomy compared to the laparoscopic technique.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Withdrawn

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Surgical resection the only potentially curative therapeutic approach in patients with pancreatic cancer. Among the clinicopathologic factors that are associated with long-term survival, a complete (i.e. R0) tumor resection is of utmost significance. Numerous reports have already demonstrated detection of tumor cells at the resection margin on microscopic examination (i.e. R1 resection) is associated with poor long-term survival. However, studies using a standardized pathological work-up of operative specimen from patients with pancreatic cancer revealed that most pancreatic resections are R1 resections. Innovative surgical techniques that reduce the incidence of R1 resections may provide a promising approach to improve the outcome of patients with pancreatic cancer.

For patients requiring a distal pancreatectomy, a laparoscopic pancreatic resection is increasingly performed, as it may enhance postoperative recovery without compromising oncological safety compared to the open approach. However, laparoscopic technique does not affect the proportion of patients with complete (R0) resections. Furthermore, the inability to control major vasculature frequently results in conversion to the open approach. The vast majority of R1 margins are located at the retroperitoneal dissection surface. Due to technical limitations, the open and the laparoscopic technique may not further reduce the incidence of positive resection margins at this location.

The 3D visualization provided by the robotic approach together with improved dexterity of the surgeon are likely to enable a meticulous dissection at the posterior dissection margin. This may result in a significant reduction of patients with positive resection margins. However, to date there has been no randomized controlled trial that compared the robotic to the laparoscopic technique. As health-care interventions need to prove efficacy and safety in well-designed randomized controlled trials, the present randomized controlled trial was designed to test, if robotic distal pancreatectomy increases the incidence of patients with complete (R0) tumor resection for pancreatic cancer. Secondary endpoints include oncological parameters such as the number of harvested lymph nodes and factors of perioperative outcome such as perioperative complications (Clavien-Dindo classification), pancreatic fistula, in-hospital mortality, blood loss and conversion rates.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Germany
      • Dresden, Germany, 01307
        • Department of Surgery, University Hospital Dresden

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected malignant disease of the pancreas scheduled for distal pancreatectomy
  • Patient eligible for laparoscopic resection
  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned multi-visceral and/or vascular resection
  • Evidence of distant metastases
  • Expected lack of compliance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: DOUBLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Robot-assisted
Distal pancreatectomy via robot-assisted minimally-invasive approach
Procedure: Robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: Laparoscopic
Distal pancreatectomy via a conventional laparoscopic approach
Procedure: Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
R1 resection rate
Time Frame: 10 days
Proportion of patients with complete macroscopic resection, but microscopic residual tumour. Pathological evaluation will be performed by experienced, board-certified pathologists using standardized protocols according to current guidelines. Importantly, pathologists will be blinded for patients treatment group.
10 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Technische Universität Dresden

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
November 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 17, 2014

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
October 21, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
June 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 31, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • VTG-02

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings