Computed Tomography (CT) Coronary Angiogram Evaluation in Cancer Patients Having CT Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis
Feasibility of Computed Tomography (CT) Coronary Angiogram Evaluation in Cancer Patients Having CT Thorax, Abdomen and Pelvis (CT TAP)
Study Overview
Status
Status
Conditions
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Enrollment
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Devon
-
Plymouth, Devon, United Kingdom, PL6 8DH
- Plymouth Hospitals NHS Trust (PHNT)
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients having routine follow up cancer CT TAP scan
- Age more than or equal to 40 years of age at the time of scan.
- Able to provide informed written consent
- Able to hold their breath for at least 10 seconds
- Has regular heart rate
- Able to follow verbal commands for breath holding and remain still for the duration of scanning
- Able to lie supine for the entirety of the scan
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient unable to give informed consent.
- Patients unable to lie supine
- Patient not able to breath hold for at least 10 seconds.
- Patients not having regular heart rate. Patient with atrial fibrillation or >2 atrial or ventricular premature beats on a preoperative 12 lead ECG (suboptimal image quality results from irregular heart rhythms)
- Patient having eGFR <30, to avoid risk of contrast nephrotoxicity in patients potentially at risk) or chronic renal failure on dialysis
- Patient has known contrast reaction.
- Patient is pregnant.
- Patients BMI>35
- Unavailability of research slot to accommodate for the urgency of the scan requested.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Number of groups / cohorts
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / CohortGroup / Cohort |
Intervention / TreatmentIntervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
CT TAP scan
Suitable patients will be identified after consultant radiologists have approved a request for cancer routine CT TAP scan.
|
Modification of chest CT protocol in the routine CT TAP: The Research CT of Thorax will be acquired as per the routinely performed CTCA with inclusion of the lung apices.
Therefore the study will be acquired axially with prospective gating.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Objective Image quality analysis
Time Frame: 20 minutes
|
Calculating image noise as measured by standard deviation (SD) in a region of interest.
|
20 minutes
|
|
Objective Image quality analysis
Time Frame: 20 minutes
|
Calculating contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR)
|
20 minutes
|
|
Subjective Image quality analysis
Time Frame: 20 minutes
|
All image data sets will be presented in blinded and randomized manner to two experienced consultant radiologists.
Subjective image quality will be assessed in terms of subjective image noise, subjective image contrast, lesion conspicuity, diagnostic confidence and artefacts.
The image quality attributes are taken from the European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computerized Tomography document and have been proven to be robust in comparing subjective image quality.
|
20 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Dose estimation
Time Frame: 20 minutes
|
The total exam dose-length product (DLP) displayed by the CT scanner at the end of each CTPA is recorded.
The effective dose in mSv is calculated by multiplying the total DLP for each exam by the conversion coefficient for the chest of 0.014 (as taken from National Radiological Protection Board Document).
|
20 minutes
|
|
Coronary segments analysis
Time Frame: 20minutes
|
Image quality of the 4 main coronary arteries (left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary artery) was determined based on a 4-point grading system - Non-diagnostic; Adequate; Good; Excellent.
|
20minutes
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Sponsor
Investigators
Investigators
- Study Director: Carl Roobottom, MBChB FRCP, University Hospital Plymouth NHS Trust
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Primary Completion
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Completion
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
First Posted
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Posted
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
Other Study ID Numbers
- 14/P/152
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.