Safety and Immunogenicity of Flublok Quadrivalent vs IIV4 in Adults 18-49 Years of Age

September 22, 2016 updated by: Protein Sciences Corporation

Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Comparison of the Immunogenicity and Safety of Flublok® Quadrivalent Versus IIV4 in Healthy, Medically Stable Adults 18-49 Years of Age

Randomized, double-blind trial of safety and immunogenicity of Flublok Quadrivalent versus Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV4) in 1350 healthy, medically stable adults 18-49 years of age. Serum samples for Hemagglutinin Inhibition titers will be determined pre- and 28 days post-vaccination. Subjects will be followed for 6 months after vaccination for serious and/or medically-attended adverse events.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

As the spectrum of influenza vaccines rapidly evolves to quadrivalent formulations with the intention of offering broader protection to include both lineages of influenza B strains, it is appropriate to transition Flublok from a trivalent to a quadrivalent formulation. The demonstration of non-inferior post-vaccination Hemagglutination Inhibition Assay (HAI) Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) to antigens in the Flublok Quadrivalent formulation compared to those of the matching antigens in a US - approved IIV4 is intended to support licensure of Flublok Quadrivalent for the adult population for which Flublok trivalent is currently approved. The comparison of safety and reactogenicity of Flublok Quadrivalent to that of IIV4 is expected to confirm a similar safety profile.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
1350

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • California
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95816
        • Benchmark Research - Sacramento
    • Florida
      • Coral Gables, Florida, United States, 33134
        • Clinical Research of South Florida
    • Georgia
      • Savannah, Georgia, United States, 31406
        • Meridian Clinical Research
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 67207
        • Heartland Research Associates, LLC
    • Louisiana
      • Metairie, Louisiana, United States, 70006
        • Benchmark Research
    • Nebraska
      • Bellevue, Nebraska, United States, 68005
        • Meridian Research
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68164
        • Meridian Clinical Research
    • South Dakota
      • Dakota Dunes, South Dakota, United States, 57049
        • Meridian Research
    • Texas
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78705
        • Benchmark Reseach
      • Fort Worth, Texas, United States, 76135
        • Benchmark Research - Fort Worth

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 49 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ambulatory, in good health or medically stable
  • Able to understand and comply with planned study procedures
  • Provide written informed consent
  • Negative urine pregnancy test within 24 hours prior to vaccination (women of child-bearing potential)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior serious or severe reaction to influenza vaccine
  • Known contraindication to either study vaccine
  • Receipt of any other influenza vaccine within 180 days prior to enrollment
  • Plan to receive another licensed influenza or other vaccine during the duration of this study
  • Receipt of any significant new diagnosis, medication (licensed or investigational), or licensed vaccine within 30 days prior to enrollment in this study
  • Underlying disease or therapeutic intervention that might adversely affect the immune response
  • Plans to participate in any investigation involving an investigational product during this study.
  • Pregnant, lactating or planning to become pregnant within 30 days of study vaccine.
  • Any clinical or social circumstance that in the opinion of the investigator could interfere with compliance with study procedures or interfere with the interpretation

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Flublok Quadrivalent Influenza Vaccine
Intramuscular injection of vaccine containing 4 x 45µg (180µg total) of each recombinant hemagglutinin (rHA) derived from influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 and two lineages of influenza B viruses identified for the season in which the trial is conducted in a total volume of 0.5 mL
Biological: Flublok Quadrivalent
Intramuscular injection of study vaccine
Active Comparator: Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV4)
Intramuscular injection of vaccine contains 4 x 15µg (60µg total) of HA derived from the same influenza A/H1N1 and A/H3N2 and influenza B strains in a total volume of 0.5mL.
Biological: Inactivated Influenza Vaccine (IIV4)
Intramuscular injection of study vaccine

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Seroconversion to Vaccine Antigens Following Vaccination With Quadrivalent Vaccine
Time Frame: Day 28 after final vaccination
Seroconversion is defined as: Either a pre vaccination titer < 10 (1/dil) and a post vaccination titer ≥ 40 (1/dil), or a pre vaccination titer ≥ 10 (1/dil) and a ≥ 4 fold increase in post vaccination titer at Day 28 after the final vaccination.
Day 28 after final vaccination
Geometric Mean Titers of Antibodies to Vaccine Antigens Following Vaccination With Quadrivalent Vaccine
Time Frame: Day 0 and Day 28 after final vaccination
Immunogenicity will be evaluated prior to vaccination and at 28 days after vaccination using the hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) technique. For each influenza vaccine strain, pre and post vaccination geometric mean titers (GMTs) were calculated.
Day 0 and Day 28 after final vaccination

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Systemic and Injection Site Reactogenicity
Time Frame: Days 0-7
Days 0-7
Number of Participants With Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) and Medically-attended Adverse Events (MAEs)
Time Frame: Six months post-vaccination
Six months post-vaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Protein Sciences Corporation

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Syneos Health
Department of Health and Human Services

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: William Seger, MD, Benchmark Research, Fort Worth, TX

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
October 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
May 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 4, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 10, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 14, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 27, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 22, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • PSC16

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings