Variation of Glucose Values at Early Stages of Diabetes - Continuous Glucose Monitoring

March 11, 2016 updated by: Folkhälsan Researech Center

Glucose Excursions at Early Stages of Diabetes, MOSAIC Prospective Study

This study aims at improving the prediction of type 2 diabetes among high-risk individuals by examining glucose excursion patterns in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. In addition, this study will show whether the currently used diagnostic test could be replaced by an easier and less expensive method.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Detailed Description

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic disease of glucose metabolism leading to various disabling conditions. The onset of type 2 diabetes is a gradual shift from normal to abnormal, giving rarely noticeable symptoms at its early stages or even in later stages when damage has already been caused. Due to the gradual onset, the diagnosis is often delayed, and as much as half of the asymptomatic patients remain undetected. The diagnostic criteria for diabetes are based on artificial boundaries reflecting the risk of complications related to diabetes. The golden standard of diagnosis of diabetes is a 2 hours oral glucose tolerance test, which is both time consuming and costly. This study aims at improving the prediction of type 2 diabetes among high-risk individuals by examining glucose excursion patterns in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. In addition, this study will show whether the currently used diagnostic test could be replaced by an easier and less expensive method.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
62

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Finland
      • Helsinki, Finland
        • Folkhälsan Research Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (2h plasma glucose during oral glucose tolerance test >7.8-11.1 mmol/l, n=50) or with type 2 diabetes (fasting plasma glucose > 7.0 mmol/l and/or 2h plasma glucose > 11.1 mmol/l on two occasions, or both criteria fulfilled in the same oral glucose tolerance test while not pregnant, n=50) with short duration (<3 years); 40 from Padova University Hospital, 60 from the Botnia Study or the PPP-Botnia Study in Finland. The Botnia Study and the PPP-Botnia Study are population based studies investigating type 2 diabetes in western Finland.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (2h plasma glucose during oral glucose tolerance test >7.8-11.1 mmol/l, n=50) or with type 2 diabetes (fasting plasma glucose > 7.0 mmol/l and/or 2h plasma glucose > 11.1 mmol/l on two occasions, or both criteria fulfilled in the same oral glucose tolerance test while not pregnant, n=50) with short duration (<3 years); 40 from Padova University Hospital, 60 from the Botnia Study or the PPP (Prevalence, Prediction, Prevention)-Botnia Study in Finland.
  • Age 40-75 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Medication with: insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-analogues, sulphonylureas, oral corticosteroids, thyreostatic agents or thyroid hormone, luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogues
  • Pregnancy
  • Known changes in retinal fundus photographs
  • Known, microalbuminuria
  • HbA1c >8%
  • Fasting plasma glucose >10 mmol/l
  • Medication with metformin, glitazones, gliptins (or acarbose) is allowed but gliptins and acarbose need to be stopped 2 days before testing and during the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
subjects at the early stages of diabetes
Subjects at the early stages of diabetes, individuals with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, 2h plasma glucose during oral glucose tolerance test >7.8-11.1 mmol/l (n=50) or with type 2 diabetes (fasting plasma glucose > 7.0 mmol/l and/or 2h plasma glucose > 11.1 mmol/l on two occasions, or both criteria fulfilled in same oral glucose tolerance test while not pregnant, n=50) with short duration (<3 years)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
glucose levels in tissue fluid
Time Frame: continuous monitoring for 1 week
continuous glucose monitoring system
continuous monitoring for 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
capillary glucose
Time Frame: 4 times a day for 1 week
for the calibration of the continuous glucose monitoring system
4 times a day for 1 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Folkhälsan Researech Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Lund University
University of Padova
University of Pavia
Medtronic
Universidad Politecnica de Madrid
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri
National Technical University of Athens
Asociación Española Para el Desarrollo de la Epidemiologia Clínica
Soluciones Tecnologias para la Salud y el Bienestar SA

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Tiinamaija Tuomi, MD,lecturer, Folkhalsan

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
December 1, 2013

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
June 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
June 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
November 17, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 18, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 19, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 14, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 11, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • Botnia012014

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings