Long-term Use of Romidepsin in Patients With CTCL

March 10, 2016 updated by: Joan Guitart, Northwestern University

Retrospective and Prospective Study of Long-term Use of Romidepsin in Patients

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCL) are a heterogeneous group of neoplasm of skin-homing T cells that includes Mycosis Fungoid (MF), which is the most common, Sézary syndrome (SS), the leukemia variant of MF, and other variants of CTCL which are less prevalent. Clinical manifestations and prognosis are highly variable. Improving the management of this incurable disease with limited toxicity is the main point of the current research. Romidepsin is a well-tolerated histone deacetylase inhibitor which has demonstrated activity against advanced stages of CTCL. In November 2009, it was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of CTCL in patients who have received at least one prior systemic therapy. FDA-dose approved is 14 mg/m2 days 1, 8, 15 of a 21 day-cycle. It is said that it should be continued as long as the patient receives benefit and tolerates the drug. We experienced in our clinic that a long-term (>6 months) use of Romidepsin, even with spared doses allows patients to maintain disease in complete remission or under control without severe side effects. We aim to demonstrate how many patients have benefited of this maintenance therapy, and detect the side effects related to the long-term use of Romidepsin, as well as characterize those patients that can get benefit of this therapy.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

This project is a retrospective and prospective chart review of patients who present at Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation clinic with the diagnosis of CTCL. It includes Mycosis Fungoid, Sézary Syndrome and other subtypes of CTCL, like Cytotoxic Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. Those patients that received or will be prescribed per standard of care with romidepsin for at least 1 month (or at least more than 1 cycle of treatment) will be reviewed. We estimate that 50 patients could fit the criteria above, since the drug started to be prescribed in the Dermatology Clinic. Clinical information regarding diagnosis, stage, prior treatment received, and therapeutic response will be recorded. Blood parameters such as cell blood count, calcium, magnesium, potassium, and albumin at baseline and after treatment with romidepsin will be reviewed, and recorded if abnormalities are detected. Electrocardiogram changes will also be checked and recorded. All the information will be gathered in an excel spreadsheet in order to perform a descriptive analysis. We aim to assess the use of romidepsin as maintenance therapy and assess which schedule of treatment was most frequently used and associated with a better response with fewer side effects.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
47

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Northwestern University Dermatology department

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 85 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Medical records of patients with a diagnosis of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma that have presented to the Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation Dermatology clinic, who receive romidepsin per standard of care practice will be reviewed. Retrospective chart reviews will be conducted for data collected between January 1, 2009 (when romidepsin was initially prescribed) to May 28, 2014. The prospective portion of the study will review chart data collected between May 29, 2014 and December 31, 2014.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with the diagnosis of Cutaneous T-cell Lymphoma who present to the Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation Dermatology clinic between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2014
  • Stages with more than 20% of bosy surface area affected or higher for MF and SS, and other CTCL variants
  • Patients treated with romidepsin
  • Between 18 and 89 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 and over 89 years
  • Patients with the diagnosis of CTCL that did not received romidepsin as a treatment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Romidepsin therapy
Patients who received romidepsin per standard of care practice or included in other clinical trials (when receiving romidepsin therapy).
Drug: Romidepsin
Received romidepsin per standard of care or through a clinical trial for more than one cycle
Other Names:
  • Maintenance therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Free disease time with maintenance therapy with romidepsin
Time Frame: 4 weeks
By the time patient received the first cycle the clinical response will be assessed
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Northwestern University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Joan Guitart, MD, Northwestern Univeristy

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
October 2, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
November 17, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
November 20, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
March 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
March 10, 2016

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
March 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • STU95649

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings