SPOG 2015 FN Definition. A Multi-center Non-inferiority Trial on Safety of a High Versus Low Temperature Limit Defining Fever in Pediatric Patients With Cancer at Risk for Fever in Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia

February 19, 2019 updated by: Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group

SPOG 2015 FN Definition. A Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group (SPOG) Initiated Multi-center Open-label Randomized Controlled Multiple Crossover Non-inferiority Trial on Safety of a High Versus Low Temperature Limit Defining Fever in Pediatric Patients With Cancer at Risk for Fever in Chemotherapy-induced Neutropenia (FN)

In a multi-center open-label cluster-randomized controlled parallel-group multiple crossover non-inferiority trial in children and adolescents up to 20 years diagnosed with cancer requiring chemotherapy, primarily the safety, and secondarily the efficacy and other endpoints, of a high (39.0°C) versus low (38.5°C) temperature limit defining fever (TLDF) for the diagnosis of fever in chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (FN) is studied. Safety is assessed by the rate of safety relevant events per chemotherapy exposure time, a composite endpoint including serious medical complications and bacteremia during FN. Patients are repeatedly randomized (cluster: study site) to the high or the low TLDF every month, resulting in possible multiple crossovers in one patient. The high TLDF is declared not to be inferior regarding safety compared to the low TLDF if non-inferiority of the rate ratio of safety relevant events is proven, with a single-sided non-inferiority margin of 1.33, applying mixed Poisson regression.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
269

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Switzerland
      • Basel, Switzerland, CH-4031
        • Basel: Universitätskinderklinik beider Basel
      • Bern, Switzerland, CH-3010
        • Bern: Universitätsklinik für Kinderheilkunde, Inselspital
      • Geneva, Switzerland, CH-1211
        • Geneva: Département de Pédiatrie, Hôpital Cantonal de Genève
      • Lausanne, Switzerland, CH-1011
        • Lausanne: Hémato-Oncologie Pédiatrique, CHUV
      • Lucerne, Switzerland, CH-6000
        • Luzern: Pädiatrische Hämatologie/Onkologie, Kinderspital
      • Zurich, Switzerland, CH-8032
        • Zürich: Pädiatrische Onkologie Kinderspital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

1 year to 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Chemotherapy treatment because of any malignancy for at least 2 months at time of recruitment for myelosuppressive therapy, or at least 1 cycle of myeloablative chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Age ≥12 months and <18 years at time of recruitment
  • Written informed consent from patients and/or parents

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants <1 years old (reason: differences in temperature measurement method)
  • Past allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
  • Denied written informed consent from patients and/or parents

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Other: 39.0°C temperature limit defining fever
Temperature limit defining fever, for definition of fever in neutropenia (FN), is single temperature >=39.0°C measured in the ear by infrared tympanic thermometry. If clinically indicated, the treating physician is allowed to make the diagnosis of FN at lower temperatures.
Other: 39.0°C temperature limit defining fever
Diagnosis of FN, correspondingly hospitalization and start of empirical intravenous broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy. Further treatment according to treating physician.
Other: 38.5°C temperature limit defining fever
Temperature limit defining fever, for definition of fever in neutropenia (FN), is single temperature >=38.5°C measured in the ear by infrared tympanic thermometry. If clinically indicated, the treating physician is allowed to make the diagnosis of FN at lower temperatures.
Other: 38.5°C temperature limit defining fever
Diagnosis of FN, correspondingly hospitalization and start of empirical intravenous broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy. Further treatment according to treating physician.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of clinically defined FN with at least one safety relevant event
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
Poisson rate: number of clinically defined FN with at least one SRE divided by the entire chemotherapy exposure time for each patient, estimated to be 1 year on average (Unit: FN per year of chemotherapy exposure time) SRE: Composite endpoint (serious medical complication AND/OR bacteremia), reached until the end of each individual FN episode (Unit: binary)
1 year (estimated average)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Times and delays of diagnosis and therapy (A)
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
Times (hh:mm) of measurement of fever - telephone to study site - arrival at emergency department - prescription of antibiotics - start and end of first dose of i.v. antibiotics (assessed per FN episode by the responsible local PHO and in patient chart, reported per FN episode; unit: hours:minutes)
1 year (estimated average)
Adverse events (B)
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
AE: clinically / microbiologically documented infection, unexplained fever, sepsis / severe sepsis / septic shock, relapse of primary infection (assessed in patient charts, reported per FN; unit:binary)
1 year (estimated average)
Delay from crossing low to high TLDF (C)
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
Only for currently active high TLDF: delay time between crossing low and high TLDF; delayed FN diagnosis (see 5.1.4) by high vs. low TLDF (assessed from patients charts, reported per FN; unit: hours:minutes)
1 year (estimated average)
Rate of clinically defined FN (D)
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
Poisson rate: number of clinically defined FN divided by the entire chemotherapy exposure time for each patient, estimated to be 1 year on average (Unit: FN per year of chemotherapy exposure time)
1 year (estimated average)
Rate of FN diagnosed at/above TLDF (E)
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
Poisson rate: number of FN diagnosed at/above TLDF divided by the entire chemotherapy exposure time for each patient, estimated to be 1 year on average (Unit: FN per year of chemotherapy exposure time)
1 year (estimated average)
Rate of FN diagnosed below TLDF (E)
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
Poisson rate: number of FN diagnosed below TLDF divided by the entire chemotherapy exposure time for each patient, estimated to be 1 year on average (Unit: FN per year of chemotherapy exposure time)
1 year (estimated average)
Duration of treatment (F)
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
. Duration of hospitalization, ICU treatment, i.v. antibiotics, p.o. antibiotics, any antibiotics, delay of chemotherapy for FN (unit: days)
1 year (estimated average)
Simultaneous and avoided FN diagnoses (G)
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
Only for currently active high TLDF: Simultaneous and avoided FN diagnoses by high vs. low TLDF (assessed from patients charts, reported per FN; unit: binary)
1 year (estimated average)

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Development of rules predicting risk of FN during chemotherapy
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
Risk prediction rules for clinically defined FN, clinically defined FN with bacteremia, with serious medical complication, and with safety relevant event during chemotherapy, all based on multivariate mixed Poisson regression (stepwise forward variable selection procedure; unit: predictor)
1 year (estimated average)
Development of rules predicting risk of adverse events during FN
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
Risk prediction rules for bacteremia, for serious medical complication, and for safety relevant event during FN, all based on multivariate mixed logistic regression (stepwise forward variable selection procedure; unit: predictor)
1 year (estimated average)
External validation of rules predicting risk of FN during chemotherapy
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
Validation of published risk prediction rules for clinically defined FN, clinically defined FN with bacteremia, with serious medical complication, and with safety relevant event during chemotherapy (units: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, area under receiver operating characteristic curve)
1 year (estimated average)
External validation of rules predicting risk of adverse events during FN
Time Frame: 1 year (estimated average)
Validation of published risk prediction rules for bacteremia, for serious medical complication, and for safety relevant event during FN (units: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, area under receiver operating characteristic curve)
1 year (estimated average)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Swiss Pediatric Oncology Group

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Roland A Ammann, MD, Universitätsklinik für Kinderheilkunde, Inselspital, Bern

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 15, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 15, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
December 18, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
December 23, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
December 24, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
February 21, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 19, 2019

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • SPOG 2015 FN Definition

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings