Prospective Identification of High-risk Coronary Plaques Through Non-invasive Imaging

January 26, 2015 updated by: Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust
Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Identifying individual patients at risk of a suture adverse events, including myocardial infractions (heart attacks), remains a major diagnostic challenge. Recent studies have shown that coronary plaques responsible for hear attack are composed of a large lipid core with a thin overlying fibrous cap. Although these features can be identified using invasive imaging modalities, non-invasive imaging options remain limited due to their poor spatial resolution. Recently the investigators have developed and validated a novel tool that will allow us to characterise coronary plaque composition based on dual source CT images. Our aim is to assess this tool within a cohort of patients who have already undergone a coronary CT as part of a previous study.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Unknown

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Reliable identification of coronary plaque at risk of causing future adverse cardiovascular events would allow patient-specific targeting of intensive therapy. The majority of events are precipitated by coronary plaque rupture, with ruptured plaques exhibiting a large necrotic, lipid core with superimposed thrombus. The proposed precursor lesion shares similar plaque compositional features to ruptured plaques but with a thin overlying fibrous cap and is termed a thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA)1. At present there is a major emphasis on imaging modalities that can identify these higher-risk plaque subtypes.

We have previously validated an invasive imaging modality, virtual-histology intravascular ultrasound (VH-IVUS) against histology, and found that VH-IVUS identified TCFA with a diagnostic accuracy of 74%2. In prospective studies, VH-defined TCFAs were associated with a 7x greater risk of future events than other plaque subtypes3. Although this technique shows promise in permitting plaque-based risk stratification, it is limited by its invasive nature. Thus, alternate, non-invasive imaging options are required for more widespread risk assessment.

Recently, we have devised a novel method of creating "Plaque Maps" using CT attenuation data individualised to each patient (Figure 1), which permits identification of coronary plaque components with a diagnostic accuracy of 75%-85%4. However, whilst CT Plaque Maps could identify fibroatheroma with similar diagnostic accuracy to VH-IVUS (79% vs. 74%), the spatial resolution of CT was unable to detect the thin fibrous cap and distinguish fibroatheroma from TCFA (Figure 2). More recently we have introduced necrotic core/fibrous plaque ratio as a possible Plaque Map surrogate for identification of TCFA. Using a ratio of >0.58, the sensitivity to detect a TCFA was 84% and specificity 75%; an improvement over all previously identified CT-defined features of high risk plaques4. Whether this novel strategy can prospectively improve identification of plaque vulnerability is unproven.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
100

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This study will be an observational, retrospective, single center cohort study based at Papworth Hospital NHS Trust, including up to a maximum of 100 patients. The patients have already been identified through their participation in a previous research study, as stated above. Additional inclusion criteria are; age >18 years and the ability to provide informed consent. The only exclusion criterion is the inability of the participant to provide informed consent.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >18 years
  • The ability to provide informed consent.
  • Previously part of CTA accuracy validation study

Exclusion Criteria:

• The inability of the participant to provide informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort

Group / Cohort

A group or subgroup of participants in an observational study that is assessed for biomedical or health outcomes.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
cohort of patients with suspected coronary artery disease
a cohort of patients with suspected coronary artery disease going forward for conventional angiography and (2) whether CT-TCFA is associated with future adverse cardiovascular events.
Other: Telephone interview

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
CT-defined TCFA association with future adverse cardiovascular events
Time Frame: 7 years post surgery
7 years post surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
January 1, 2016

Study Completion (Anticipated)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
March 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 7, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 26, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
January 27, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
January 27, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
January 26, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
January 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • P01987 Protocol 1.0 September

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings