Prebiotic in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

April 6, 2017 updated by: Lilian Cuppari, Federal University of São Paulo

Effect of Prebiotic (Fructooligosaccharide) on Uremic Toxins and Cardiovascular Markers of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients

This 12-week double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial aims to investigate the effect of a prebiotic (fructooligosaccharide - FOS) on serum and urinary levels of uremic toxins (p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate) of non-dialysis dependent CKD patients, and the impact of such intervention on cardiovascular markers, intestinal permeability, endotoxemia and inflammatory response.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Intestinal microbiome has been considered a new therapeutic target for chronic kidney disease (CKD) due to its potential role on the metabolic disturbances associated to the disease. The abnormalities in the microbiota, frequently found in patients with CKD, contribute to the accumulation of uremic toxins derived from the unbalanced fermentation of nitrogen compounds in relation to the non-digestible carbohydrates. Among them, p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate have been associated with inflammation, kidney disease progression, endothelial dysfunction and increased risk of death in this population. Preliminary studies especially on hemodialysis have shown that the use of prebiotic, probiotic and symbiotic may represent a promising intervention due to their beneficial effect as modulators of the intestinal microbiota that might promote a reduction on serum concentration of p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate. In comparison to probiotic, prebiotic have the advantage to stimulate the host's microbiota and to occur naturally in several foods. In the context of CKD, the use of prebiotics has been poorly investigated. Therefore, the primary aim of this study is to investigate the effect of a prebiotic (fructooligosaccharide - FOS) on serum and urinary levels of p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate of non-dialysis dependent CKD patients. As a secondary aim we will investigate the impact of such intervention on cardiovascular markers, intestinal permeability, endotoxemia and inflammatory response. This is a 12-week double-blind randomized controlled clinical trial. Fifty non-diabetic patients with CKD stages 3a and 4 will be randomly assigned to a 12 g/day of FOS or maltodextrin (placebo). The serum and urinary concentrations of p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate will be determined by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The assessment of endothelial function includes ultrasonography of the brachial artery, measurement of plasma and urinary nitric oxide, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1), stromal cell-derived factor 1 alpha (SDF1α), oxide - trimethylamine N- (TMAO), ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and pulse wave velocity (PWV). The serum intestinal trophic markers (glucagon-like peptide 2 - GLP2 - and epidermal growth factor - EGF), intestinal permeability (Zonulin), endotoxemia and inflammation (IL-6 and CRP) will be determined by ELISA. Food intake will be assessed by 3-day food records. Protein intake will be estimated by calculating the protein equivalent of nitrogen appearance (PNA). The Bristol Scale, the Roma III Criteria and the Gastrointestinal Symptoms Rating Scale will be applied to evaluate gastrointestinal effects during the follow-up. The subjective global assessment questionnaire, the spectroscopic bioimpedance analysis and the handgrip strength will be applied to evaluate the nutritional status of the patients.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
50

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Brazil
      • São Paulo, Brazil
        • Federal University of São Paulo

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 to 80 years
  • Estimated glomerular filtration rate between 45 to 15 ml/min/1,73m².

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diabetes mellitus, malignance, severe liver disease, autoimmune diseases, congestive heart failure class III / IV, HIV, history of gastrointestinal disease
  • use of phosphate binders, laxatives or prebiotic, probiotic, symbiotic, antibiotics, immunosuppressants and / or anti-inflammatory drugs three months preceding the study.
  • patients using laxatives who refuse to stop treatment during the follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: Fructooligosaccharide
12g daily, for 12 weeks
Dietary supplement: Fructooligosaccharide
Patients will be evaluated at baseline, week 6 and 12.
Other Names:
  • Prebiotic
Placebo Comparator: Maltodextrin
12g daily, for 12 weeks
Dietary supplement: Maltodextrin
Placebo Comparator. Patients will be evaluated at baseline, week 6 and 12.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Uremic toxicity evaluated by serum and urinary levels of p-cresyl sulfate and indoxyl sulfate
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Endotoxemia measured by serum levels of lipopolysaccharides
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Intestinal permeability evaluated by serum levels of Zonulin
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Intestinal epithelium evaluated by serum levels of glucagon-like peptide 2 (GLP2)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Intestinal epithelium evaluated by serum levels of epidermal growth factor (EGF).
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Inflammation measured by serum levels of Interleukin-6 (IL-6)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Inflammation measured by serum levels of c-reactive protein (CRP)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Endothelial function evaluated by ultrasonography of the brachial artery
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Endothelial function evaluated by blood pressure monitoring (ABPM)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Endothelial function evaluated by pulse wave velocity (PWV).
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Endothelial function evaluated by plasma and urinary levels of nitric oxide
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Endothelial function evaluated by plasma and urinary levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein 1 (MCP1)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Endothelial function evaluated by plasma and urinary levels of stromal cell-derived factor 1 alpha (SDF1α)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks
Endothelial function evaluated by plasma and urinary levels of oxide - trimethylamine N- (TMAO)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Federal University of São Paulo

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
Universidade Federal do Paraná
Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Lilian Cupari, PhD, Affiliate professor of Federal University of São Paulo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
December 1, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
December 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
January 13, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
February 17, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
February 18, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
April 7, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 6, 2017

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
April 1, 2017

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • MCTI/CNPQ: 449614/2014-0

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings