Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Levulan and Blue Light for the Treatment of Actinic Cheilitis

October 22, 2018 updated by: Michael S. Chapman, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of PDT with blue light and topical Levulan in the treatment of actinic cheilitis.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study will consist of a screening visit, up to three scheduled treatments, and two scheduled office visits. There can be a three-day window period for each scheduled visit in order to accommodate the subject's schedule and unforeseen scheduling conflicts.

  1. Visit 1 (Screening): Subjects can be screened for the study up to two weeks before Visit 2 (Baseline). During screening, the study will be reviewed, written informed consent obtained, and eligibility confirmed. If applicable, the washout from prohibited medications or treatments will be determined at this visit.
  2. Visit 2 (Baseline): Following signed, written informed consent and confirmation of eligibility, all subjects will have their lips photographed. Medical history, dermatologic exam, urine pregnancy test (if applicable), review of concomitant medications, clinical evaluations, and tolerability assessments will be performed at this visit. Study medication application to clean skin will be followed by a 90 minute incubation period under occlusion. Subsequently, patients will be exposed to blue light therapy for 16 minutes and 40 seconds. Post-therapy assessments will be performed afterwards, as well as education on appropriate sun protection methods.
  3. Visits 3-4: Subjects will return every six weeks for up to two additional treatments. Treatment will be discontinued once the patient has achieved clinical clearance. Tolerability assessments, study medication application, blue light therapy, post-therapy assessments, and photographs will be performed.
  4. Visit 5-6 (End of Study): Subjects will return 12 and 24 weeks after the last treatment for clinical evaluations, tolerability assessments, and photographs.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
24

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • United States
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03766
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be able to understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
  • Must be male or female ≥ 18 years of age at the time of consent
  • Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
  • Must have a diagnosis of actinic cheilitis by histopathological evaluation of biopsy specimen or clinical presentation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide voluntarily consent or mentally incompetent
  • Active herpes labialis lesions
  • Subjects with any condition which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study, or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study
  • Subjects with any other skin condition that might affect the evaluation of the study disease
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding female subjects
  • Subjects who have used any investigational medication within one month prior to study entry
  • Subjects who have been previously exposed to PDT and/or topical Levulan therapy for the treatment of actinic cheilitis
  • Subjects who have used local therapy (e.g. cryotherapy) or topical treatment (e.g. 5% fluorouracil) within three months of study entry
  • Subjects who have used an oral photosensitizing drug (e.g. Declomycin) within six months of study entry
  • Subjects who are currently using photosensitizing agents (e.g. thiazides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, phenothiazines, and sulfonamides) because of the risk of augmented photosensitivity
  • Subjects who are frequently exposed to ultraviolet radiation (e.g. lifeguards, construction workers, frequent sunbed users, etc.)
  • Subjects with a history of cutaneous photosensitization, porphyria, hypersensitivity to porphyrins, or photodermatosis
  • Subjects with a known hypersensitivity to Levulan
  • Subjects who are immunocompromised

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Experimental: PDT
PDT with aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (HCl) and blue light to the affected area of the lips every six weeks for up to three treatments
Drug: aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride
Other Names:
  • Levulan
  • aminolevulinic acid HCl
Procedure: Photodynamic therapy with blue light
Other Names:
  • PDT
  • PDT with blue light

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With a Change in Clearance From Baseline
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 5 or 6 (Week 24 or 36)
Clearance will be estimated clinically as minimal (0%-25%), mild (26%-50%), moderate (51%-75%), good (76%-99%), or complete (100%). Results will also be evaluated by comparing photographs before and immediately after treatments, and 12 and 24 weeks after the last treatment.
Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 5 or 6 (Week 24 or 36)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Change in Participant Reported Pain
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36
Subject reported pain before, during and after blue light illumination was documented using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The maximum change in pain is 10 for each occurrence (pain before compared to during treatment and pain during compared to after treatment). This is multiplied by the number of subjects and then divided by the number of treatments to generate the range. The summation of the change between subject reported pain prior to compared to during blue light treatment was divided by the total number of treatments to obtain the average value. The summation of the change between subject reported pain during compared to after blue light treatment was divided by the total number of treatments to obtain the average value.
Baseline to Week 36
Average Change in Local Skin Reactions to Blue Light Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36
Assessments of swelling, erythema, and flaking/scaling were conducted after each treatment and two days post-treatment using a five-point ordinal scale (0: none to 4: severe). The average change in swelling, erythema and flaking/scaling after each treatment and two days post treatment were divided by the 50 total treatments to obtain the average value.
Baseline to Week 36
The Number of Participants Who Developed a Local Skin Reaction to Blue Light Treatment: Vesiculation/Pustulation, Erosion/Ulceration, Crusting and Hyperpigmentation
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36
Assessments of vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration, and crusting were conducted immediately after each blue light treatment using a five-point ordinal scale (0: none to 4: severe). The presence or absence of hyperpigmentation in the treatment area was also documented after each treatment visit. The total number of participants who developed a local skin reaction is documented.
Baseline to Week 36
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36
Evaluation of any reported local or systemic events outside the treatment area and other than those specified under local skin reactions or PDT reactions.
Baseline to Week 36

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Collaborators

Collaborators

An organization other than the sponsor that provides support for a clinical study. This support may include activities related to funding, design, implementation, data analysis, or reporting.
DUSA Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Michael S Chapman, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
October 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
October 22, 2018

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • D15043 28525

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Cheilitis

Clinical Trials on aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings