Photodynamic Therapy (PDT) With Levulan and Blue Light for the Treatment of Actinic Cheilitis

October 22, 2018 updated by: Michael S. Chapman, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
To evaluate the safety and efficacy of PDT with blue light and topical Levulan in the treatment of actinic cheilitis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study will consist of a screening visit, up to three scheduled treatments, and two scheduled office visits. There can be a three-day window period for each scheduled visit in order to accommodate the subject's schedule and unforeseen scheduling conflicts.

  1. Visit 1 (Screening): Subjects can be screened for the study up to two weeks before Visit 2 (Baseline). During screening, the study will be reviewed, written informed consent obtained, and eligibility confirmed. If applicable, the washout from prohibited medications or treatments will be determined at this visit.
  2. Visit 2 (Baseline): Following signed, written informed consent and confirmation of eligibility, all subjects will have their lips photographed. Medical history, dermatologic exam, urine pregnancy test (if applicable), review of concomitant medications, clinical evaluations, and tolerability assessments will be performed at this visit. Study medication application to clean skin will be followed by a 90 minute incubation period under occlusion. Subsequently, patients will be exposed to blue light therapy for 16 minutes and 40 seconds. Post-therapy assessments will be performed afterwards, as well as education on appropriate sun protection methods.
  3. Visits 3-4: Subjects will return every six weeks for up to two additional treatments. Treatment will be discontinued once the patient has achieved clinical clearance. Tolerability assessments, study medication application, blue light therapy, post-therapy assessments, and photographs will be performed.
  4. Visit 5-6 (End of Study): Subjects will return 12 and 24 weeks after the last treatment for clinical evaluations, tolerability assessments, and photographs.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03766
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Must be able to understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form
  • Must be male or female ≥ 18 years of age at the time of consent
  • Must be able to adhere to the study visit schedule and other protocol requirements
  • Must have a diagnosis of actinic cheilitis by histopathological evaluation of biopsy specimen or clinical presentation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to provide voluntarily consent or mentally incompetent
  • Active herpes labialis lesions
  • Subjects with any condition which places the subject at unacceptable risk if he/she were to participate in the study, or confounds the ability to interpret data from the study
  • Subjects with any other skin condition that might affect the evaluation of the study disease
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding female subjects
  • Subjects who have used any investigational medication within one month prior to study entry
  • Subjects who have been previously exposed to PDT and/or topical Levulan therapy for the treatment of actinic cheilitis
  • Subjects who have used local therapy (e.g. cryotherapy) or topical treatment (e.g. 5% fluorouracil) within three months of study entry
  • Subjects who have used an oral photosensitizing drug (e.g. Declomycin) within six months of study entry
  • Subjects who are currently using photosensitizing agents (e.g. thiazides, tetracyclines, fluoroquinolones, phenothiazines, and sulfonamides) because of the risk of augmented photosensitivity
  • Subjects who are frequently exposed to ultraviolet radiation (e.g. lifeguards, construction workers, frequent sunbed users, etc.)
  • Subjects with a history of cutaneous photosensitization, porphyria, hypersensitivity to porphyrins, or photodermatosis
  • Subjects with a known hypersensitivity to Levulan
  • Subjects who are immunocompromised

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: PDT
PDT with aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride (HCl) and blue light to the affected area of the lips every six weeks for up to three treatments
Other Names:
  • Levulan
  • aminolevulinic acid HCl
Other Names:
  • PDT
  • PDT with blue light

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With a Change in Clearance From Baseline
Time Frame: Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 5 or 6 (Week 24 or 36)
Clearance will be estimated clinically as minimal (0%-25%), mild (26%-50%), moderate (51%-75%), good (76%-99%), or complete (100%). Results will also be evaluated by comparing photographs before and immediately after treatments, and 12 and 24 weeks after the last treatment.
Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 5 or 6 (Week 24 or 36)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Average Change in Participant Reported Pain
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36
Subject reported pain before, during and after blue light illumination was documented using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). The maximum change in pain is 10 for each occurrence (pain before compared to during treatment and pain during compared to after treatment). This is multiplied by the number of subjects and then divided by the number of treatments to generate the range. The summation of the change between subject reported pain prior to compared to during blue light treatment was divided by the total number of treatments to obtain the average value. The summation of the change between subject reported pain during compared to after blue light treatment was divided by the total number of treatments to obtain the average value.
Baseline to Week 36
Average Change in Local Skin Reactions to Blue Light Treatment
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36
Assessments of swelling, erythema, and flaking/scaling were conducted after each treatment and two days post-treatment using a five-point ordinal scale (0: none to 4: severe). The average change in swelling, erythema and flaking/scaling after each treatment and two days post treatment were divided by the 50 total treatments to obtain the average value.
Baseline to Week 36
The Number of Participants Who Developed a Local Skin Reaction to Blue Light Treatment: Vesiculation/Pustulation, Erosion/Ulceration, Crusting and Hyperpigmentation
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36
Assessments of vesiculation/pustulation, erosion/ulceration, and crusting were conducted immediately after each blue light treatment using a five-point ordinal scale (0: none to 4: severe). The presence or absence of hyperpigmentation in the treatment area was also documented after each treatment visit. The total number of participants who developed a local skin reaction is documented.
Baseline to Week 36
Number of Participants With Adverse Events
Time Frame: Baseline to Week 36
Evaluation of any reported local or systemic events outside the treatment area and other than those specified under local skin reactions or PDT reactions.
Baseline to Week 36

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Michael S Chapman, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

April 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 23, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2018

Last Verified

October 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Actinic Cheilitis

Clinical Trials on aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride

Subscribe