Ultrasound Versus Palpation for Epidural Catheterization

September 21, 2015 updated by: Mohamed Mohamed Tawfik, Mansoura University

Comparison Between Ultrasound-assisted and Conventional Palpation Techniques for Epidural Catheterization Before Cesarean Section

The study will assess the benefit of using spinal ultrasound before epidural catheter insertion compared to the conventional palpation technique in women undergoing cesarean section.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

The study will compare the ultrasound-assisted and the conventional palpation techniques for epidural catheterization as a component of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean section.

Participants will be randomly assigned into 2 equal groups. In the ultrasound group: Preprocedure lumbar spinal ultrasound will be performed before epidural catheterization. In the palpation group: Conventional technique of landmark palpation will be used.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
110

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Egypt
    • Dakahlia
      • Mansoura, Dakahlia, Egypt, 35511
        • Department of Anesthesia, Mansoura University Hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

19 years to 40 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists class I or II.
  • Full term parturients scheduled for elective cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Body mass index ≥ 35 kg/m2.
  • Patients having any contraindication to neuraxial anesthesia (Refusal of the procedure, Coagulopathy, Uncorrected hypovolemia, Increased intracranial pressure, Local skin infection).
  • Marked spinal deformity or previous spinal surgery.
  • Unpalpable anatomical landmarks.
  • Emergent situations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
Active Comparator: Palpation
Double-space combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, Sham ultrasound procedure
Procedure: Double-space combined spinal-epidural anesthesia
Epidural space identification in Lumbar 2-3 or 3-4 space using loss of resistance to air technique with 18-gauge Tuohy needle, then threading a 20-gauge multi-orifice epidural catheter 4-5 cm into the epidural space. Spinal anesthesia administration in an appropriate lower intervertebral space with intrathecal bupivacaine 12.5 mg and fentanyl 10 mcg through a 27-gauge spinal needle.
Radiation: Sham ultrasound procedure
Applying the ultrasound probe on the patient's back while the ultrasound machine is on the freeze position.Then skin markings relying on landmark palpation are made identifying 2 intervertebral spaces.
Experimental: Ultrasound
Double-space combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, Preprocedure spinal ultrasound
Procedure: Double-space combined spinal-epidural anesthesia
Epidural space identification in Lumbar 2-3 or 3-4 space using loss of resistance to air technique with 18-gauge Tuohy needle, then threading a 20-gauge multi-orifice epidural catheter 4-5 cm into the epidural space. Spinal anesthesia administration in an appropriate lower intervertebral space with intrathecal bupivacaine 12.5 mg and fentanyl 10 mcg through a 27-gauge spinal needle.
Radiation: Preprocedure spinal ultrasound
Lumbar spinal ultrasound using the 2-5 MHz curved probe, performed in both the longitudinal and transverse planes for identification of the appropriate intervertebral spce, estimation of the depth to the epidural space, and noting the proper angle for subsequent needle insertion. Then skin markings relying on the ultrasound procedure are made identifying 2 intervertebral spaces.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of successful epidural catheterization at the first needle pass
Time Frame: 24 hours after delivery
Needle pass includes any forward advancement of the Tuohy needle.
24 hours after delivery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of successful epidural catheterization at the first skin puncture
Time Frame: 24 hours after delivery
Skin puncture includes any separate skin puncture by the Tuohy needle.
24 hours after delivery
Number of needle passes required for successful epidural catheterization
Time Frame: 24 hours after delivery
24 hours after delivery
Number of skin punctures required for successful epidural catheterization
Time Frame: 24 hours after delivery
24 hours after delivery
Time of the epidural catheterization procedure
Time Frame: 24 hours after delivery
From the initial Tuohy needle insertion through the skin to the completion of the threading of the epidural catheter.
24 hours after delivery
Patient satisfaction (5-point scale)
Time Frame: 24 hours after delivery
5-point scale
24 hours after delivery
Rate of Inadvertent dural puncture
Time Frame: 24 hours after delivery
24 hours after delivery
Rate of Inadvertent vascular puncture
Time Frame: 24 hours after delivery
24 hours after delivery
Rate of Failed block
Time Frame: At the first request of analgesia
Complete failure of epidural catheter after 2 doses of epidural injection of 10 ml bupivacaine 0.25% and fentanyl 20 mcg administered 20 min apart.
At the first request of analgesia
Unilateral / Patchy block (Assessed by pinprick)
Time Frame: At the first request of analgesia
Assessed by pinprick after 20 min of epidural injection of 10 ml bupivacaine 0.25% and fentanyl 20 mcg
At the first request of analgesia
Rate of Back pain
Time Frame: 24 hours after delivery
24 hours after delivery

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Level of successful epidural catheterization
Time Frame: 24 hours after delivery
The lumbar intervertebral space L 2-3 or 3-4 used for epidural catheter insertion.
24 hours after delivery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Mansoura University

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed M Tawfik, M.Sc., Department of Anesthesia and Surgical Intensive Care, Mansoura University Hospitals.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
April 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
September 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
September 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
March 30, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
April 6, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
April 7, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
September 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
September 21, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
September 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • R115

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Epidural Anesthesia

Clinical Trials on Double-space combined spinal-epidural anesthesia

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings