Topical Nepafenac as Supplement for Diabetic Macular Edema

May 8, 2015 updated by: Jan Bond Chan, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Evaluation on Efficacy of Topical Nepafenac as Supplement Therapy in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a major cause of visual loss in patients with diabetes mellitus. The standard treatment is with focal/grid laser therapy. Topical nepafenac was used as an adjunct therapy for treatment of DME.

The aim of this study is to compare the difference of best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) at 3 months post treatment between combination therapy of laser and topical nepafenac and laser monotherapy in patients with DME.

Study Overview

Status

Status

Indicates the current recruitment status or the expanded access status.
Completed

Conditions

Conditions

The disease, disorder, syndrome, illness, or injury that is being studied. On ClinicalTrials.gov, conditions may also include other health-related issues, such as lifespan, quality of life, and health risks.

Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.

Detailed Description

Diabetes mellitus with its systemic complications has been an enormous health treat to the world population today. In the US, the ophthalmic related complications has been estimated to cause up to 4.2 million (28.5%) people in 2005 till 2008 to suffer from blindness. One of the most common causes of visual acuity loss in patients with diabetes mellitus is diabetic macular edema (DME).

The gold standard of treatment for clinically significant macular edema (CSME), a form of DME, is through focal and grid laser as shown by the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. The development of newer drugs such as anti vascular endothelial growth factors anti (VEGFs), an alternative to laser treatment, has become a topic of interest in the recent years. Other alternative to treatment of DME is steroid such as triamcinolone injection and dexamethasone injections. However, both anti VEGFs and steroids are expensive and not readily available in all centres. Both types of medications require repeated treatment and the route of administration through intravitreal also poses risk of endophthalmitis, lens injury, retinal detachment, vitreous hemorrhage, increase in intraocular pressure and cataract.

The pathophysiology of DME is not fully understood yet. It was suggested that it is likely to be a chronic low-grade inflammation. Through this theory, topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have been used to treat DME. The investigators postulate that the addition of topical NSAIDs in patients receiving standard treatment of laser therapy may help to improve the outcome of patients with DME. It has the advantage of no needles involved, convenient, easy to use and minimal side effects. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of visual acuity and macular thickness at 3 months post treatment between laser monotherapy and combination of laser and topical nepafenac in DME.

Study Type

Study Type

Describes the nature of a clinical study. Study types include interventional studies (also called clinical trials), observational studies (including patient registries), and expanded access.
Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

Enrollment

The number of participants in a clinical study. The "anticipated" enrollment is the target number of participants that the researchers need for the study.
47

Phase

Phase

The stage of a clinical trial studying a drug or biological product, based on definitions developed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The phase is based on the study's objective, the number of participants, and other characteristics. There are five phases: Early Phase 1 (formerly listed as Phase 0), Phase 1, Phase 2, Phase 3, and Phase 4. Not Applicable is used to describe trials without FDA-defined phases, including trials of devices or behavioral interventions.
  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Malaysia
    • Kelantan
      • Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia, 16150
        • Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia
    • Selangor
      • Batu Caves, Selangor, Malaysia, 68000
        • Hospital Selayang

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

The key requirements that people who want to participate in a clinical study must meet or the characteristics they must have. Eligibility criteria consist of both inclusion criteria (which are required for a person to participate in the study) and exclusion criteria (which prevent a person from participating). Types of eligibility criteria include whether a study accepts healthy volunteers, has age or age group requirements, or is limited by sex.

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with CSME
  • Aged 18 to 70 years old
  • Clear media (Able to perform OCT)
  • HbA1c less than 12% at 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • CSME with severe Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy (NPDR) or Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy(PDR)
  • Previous laser treatment
  • Previous ocular injury or surgery
  • History of taking topical or systemic anti inflammatory agents
  • Allergic to NSAIDs
  • Other ocular pathology (ARMD, Glaucoma, IPCV)
  • High myope

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm

Participant Group / Arm

A group or subgroup of participants in a clinical trial that receives a specific intervention/treatment, or no intervention, according to the trial's protocol.
Intervention / Treatment

Intervention / Treatment

A process or action that is the focus of a clinical study. Interventions include drugs, medical devices, procedures, vaccines, and other products that are either investigational or already available. Interventions can also include noninvasive approaches, such as education or modifying diet and exercise.
EXPERIMENTAL: Nevanac
Patients with CSME treated with argon laser photocoagulation (focal/grid laser) and Topical Gutt Nepafenac 0.1% given 8 hourly interval for 3 months
Drug: Topical Gutt Nepafenac 0.1%
Topical Nepafenac as an adjunct to focal/grid laser
Other Names:
  • Nevanac
Procedure: Laser
Grid/Focal Laser Photocoagulation
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Laser
Patients with CSME treated with argon laser photocoagulation (focal/grid laser)
Procedure: Laser
Grid/Focal Laser Photocoagulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, the planned outcome measure that is the most important for evaluating the effect of an intervention/treatment. Most clinical studies have one primary outcome measure, but some have more than one.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Logarithm Best Minimal Angle of Resolution Corrected Visual Acuity (LogMAR BCVA) (Measurement of Visual Acuity)
Time Frame: 3 months
Measurement of Best Corrected Visual Acuity by means of refraction using the ETDRS Chart
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Secondary Outcome Measures

In a clinical study's protocol, a planned outcome measure that is not as important as the primary outcome measure for evaluating the effect of an intervention but is still of interest. Most clinical studies have more than one secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in central macular thickness (measurement of macular thickness)
Time Frame: 3 months
Measurement of macular thickness using Spectralis OCT
3 months

Other Outcome Measures

Other Outcome Measures

For clinical trials, a planned measurement described in the protocol that is used to determine the effect of an intervention/treatment on participants. For observational studies, a measurement or observation that is used to describe patterns of diseases or traits, or associations with exposures, risk factors, or treatment. Types of outcome measures include primary outcome measure and secondary outcome measure.
Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety profile of topical nepafenac as assessed by side effects (such as keratitis, eye redness and blepharitis and epithelial defect)
Time Frame: 3 months
We look into side effects of topical NSAIDs such as keratitis, eye redness and blepharitis and epithelial defect.
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Sponsor

The organization or person who initiates the study and who has authority and control over the study.
Universiti Sains Malaysia

Investigators

Investigators

A researcher involved in a clinical study. Related terms include site principal investigator, site sub-investigator, study chair, study director, and study principal investigator.
  • Study Chair: Zunaina Embong, MS Ophthal, Universiti Sains Malaysia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

Study Start

The actual date on which the first participant was enrolled in a clinical study. The "anticipated" study start date is the date that the researchers think will be the study start date.
March 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

Primary Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention to collect final data for the primary outcome measure. Whether the clinical study ended according to the protocol or was terminated does not affect this date. For clinical studies with more than one primary outcome measure with different completion dates, this term refers to the date on which data collection is completed for all the primary outcome measures. The "anticipated" primary completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the primary completion date for the study.
August 1, 2014

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

Study Completion

The date on which the last participant in a clinical study was examined or received an intervention/treatment to collect final data for the primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and adverse events (that is, the last participant's last visit). The "anticipated" study completion date is the date that the researchers think will be the study completion date.
August 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

First Submitted

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submitted a study record to ClinicalTrials.gov. There is typically a delay of a few days between the first submitted date and the record's availability on ClinicalTrials.gov (the first posted date).
April 25, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The date on which the study sponsor or investigator first submits a study record that is consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. The sponsor or investigator may need to revise and submit a study record one or more times before NLM's QC review criteria are met. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2015

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

First Posted

The date on which the study record was first available on ClinicalTrials.gov after National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review has concluded. There is typically a delay of a few days between the date the study sponsor or investigator submitted the study record and the first posted date.
May 13, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

Last Update Posted

The most recent date on which changes to a study record were made available on ClinicalTrials.gov. There may be a delay between when the changes were submitted to ClinicalTrials.gov by the study's sponsor or investigator (the last update submitted date) and the last update posted date.
May 13, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator submitted changes to a study record that are consistent with National Library of Medicine (NLM) quality control (QC) review criteria. It is the responsibility of the sponsor or investigator to ensure that the study record is consistent with the NLM QC review criteria.
May 8, 2015

Last Verified

Last Verified

The most recent date on which the study sponsor or investigator confirmed the information about a clinical study on ClinicalTrials.gov as accurate and current. If a study with a recruitment status of recruiting; not yet recruiting; or active, not recruiting has not been confirmed within the past 2 years, the study's recruitment status is shown as unknown.
May 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

Other Study ID Numbers

Identifiers or ID numbers other than the NCT number that are assigned to a clinical study by the study's sponsor, funders, or others. These numbers may include unique identifiers from other trial registries and National Institutes of Health grant numbers.
  • NMRR-13-1296-13714
  • 1001/PPSP/812064 (OTHER_GRANT: Research University Grant (USM))

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Diabetic Macular Edema

Clinical Trials on Topical Gutt Nepafenac 0.1%

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

Cookie Settings

We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. For more details carefully read our Privacy and Cookies Policy. ...>>>You can change your preferences or withdraw your consent at any time by deleting the cookies from your website or computer as described in the policy. Please accept it and choose your preferences by ticking the corresponding boxes in the "Manage Settings" section below. Please carefully read our Terms of Service before you proceed with using any part of this website.
«Manage Settings